"Mrs. Merkel, Tony Blair, all of them, even President Putin, were all 'Young Global Leaders' at one time!
"The WEF's task [...] is to implement the NWO (New World Order) agenda worldwide with the help of big business. [...] The entire corporate elite is concentrated on the WEF - including the central pharmaceutical companies that play a key role during the Corona." In just a few decades, the WEF has managed to become one of the most important political and economic centers of world politics and the economy to become. How did an unknown German professor catapult his Swiss foundation to such unimaginable heights? Were there possibly influential forces backing him behind the scenes?

Who are the masterminds behind the WEF? Kla.TV's documentary ruthlessly exposes the actual plans of the WEF and the entire management level. You can also find out which people from your country are implementing the WEF program, who are strategically trained by the WEF.
From January 15-19, 2024, the World Economic Forum - WEF for short - 54th Annual will be held in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland According to his own information, he will focus on new technologies and their impact on decision-making and global partnership. The WEF sees the Annual Meetings as the most important platform for promoting Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) at the highest level. The meeting is attended by more than 100 governments, all major international organizations, the 1,000 largest global companies, the largest academic and other institutions, and the global media.
There is no doubt that the WEF and its initiatives can be considered the driving force behind globalization. Globalization has become a social fact. Globalization comes from the word "global" - "involving the whole world" - and literally means "becoming worldwide".

According to the German Federal Agency for Civic Education (bpb), complex forms of global governance have emerged in recent decades. "Global governance" is colloquially referred to as "world governance", but it can also be translated literally as "world governance". And this is where opinions are divided. Some, such as the Federal Agency for Civic Education, insist that the term does not refer to a centralized world government and that no such government exists. Others, however, see a worldwide conspiracy behind the WEF and initiatives such as the "Great Reboot." A "global political and business elite seeks a globalized dictatorship." This position about a possible world conspiracy is slandered as a conspiracy theory by almost all the so-called mainstream, synchronized media.

But where is the line between globalization, global governance and a central world government? Are there any boundaries at all?

This show sheds light on these questions and looks behind the WEF and the Great Reboot: Who are the masterminds and is there a world conspiracy after all?

1. The origin and establishment of the WEF
2. The financing of the WEF
3. The management structure of the WEF
4. What were the goals of the WEF?
5. In order to achieve the goals and agenda of WEF initiatives
6. In order to achieve the goals and agenda of other WEF players
7 The WEF in a nutshell

1 The origin and foundation of the WEF

In 1971, the German economist Klaus Schwab established the non-profit foundation called "European Management Conference". In 1987, this was renamed the "World Economic Forum", or WEF for short. In just a few decades, the WEF managed to become one of the most important political and economic centers of world politics and the world economy.

In his book "World Economic Forum - Die Weltmacht im Hintergrund", German journalist and financial expert Ernst Wolff investigates how an unknown German professor was able to catapult his Swiss foundation to such unimaginable heights. Were there any influential forces supporting him behind the scenes?

According to Ivo Sasek, the founder of Kla.TV:
"Nevertheless, it seems to me that the World Economic Forum was pushed to the fore by even more influential background powers. The founder of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, also provides strong evidence for this. His rapid rise to the "leader of the private world" , I might say, is such unmistakable evidence of a hidden background power that I must inevitably perceive the whole WEF as a private world economic sect that has been successfully incorporated into world politics."

Background information on Klaus Schwab
Klaus Schwab is a member of the globally oriented and influential Bilderberg Group. He participated in many Bilderberg meetings and was even active in the Bilderberg steering committee.

The people behind Klaus Schwab
Between 1966 and 1967, Schwab completed an academic year at the American Harvard Business School. Quoting Ernst Wolff: "Here he met some personalities who had a great influence on the development of his life. According to Schwab himself, his professor, Henry Kissinger, was one of the people who had the greatest influence on his thinking during his life." Kissinger, who died on November 30, 2023, was an American political scientist, self-confessed global strategist and director of the think tank "Council on Foreign Relations", CFR for short.

Unlimited Hangout, the American platform for uncensored and independent investigative journalism, summarized it in a nutshell: "The World Economic Forum was not simply a European creation of Klaus Schwab. It was born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program that Henry Kissinger - along with John Kenneth Galbraith and Herman Kahn - led. Schwab had a team of American political elites working in the shadows to help him create the European-based globalist organization (which later became the WEF). [...]"
Years later, at the 1980 European Management Symposium in Davos - the predecessor of the WEF - Kissinger gave the opening speech and said, "For the first time in history, foreign policy is truly global."

The other two Harvard professors were hardly less important than Kissinger: John Kenneth Galbraith and Herman Kahn. Galbraith flew to Europe with Kahn to help Schwab convince the European elite to support the project. - This is what "Unlimited Mood" reported. According to a 1997 New York Times article, Schwab returned with the idea that Europeans would probably pay good money to learn the management methods taught at Harvard Business School. John Kenneth Galbraith (1908-2006) was a Canadian-American presidential adviser and one of the most influential economists of the 20th century. Galbraith was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR for short).
Herman Kahn (1922-1983) was an American physicist and a founding member of the Hudson Institute. He was also a member of the CFR.

The first meetings in Davos

The first meeting organized by Schwab took place in 1971 under the name European Management Symposium. The main speaker of the meeting was Otto von Habsburg. Kenneth Galbraith and Herman Kahn were among the speakers.

The first meetings were organized under the auspices of the European Commission and European industrial associations. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands was the honorary patron of the third European Management Symposium in 1973. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands organized the first Bilderberg conference in 1954 at the Hotel de Bilderberg near Arnhem, which he then owned. - Then secretly. Prince Bernhard was the first chairman of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group until 1976.

The "European Management Forum" published its first institutional publication in 1975. Quote: "The European Management Forum is an independent, self-financing, non-profit foundation focused on the strategic needs of key decision-makers in the European economy." After barely five years, the Forum has already established itself at the highest levels of business and government.

By 1983, the European Management Symposium - as Klaus Schwab put it in his opening speech - "became the most important annual meeting of decision-makers in the world economy".

2 Funding of the WEF

The WEF was founded in 1971 as a non-profit foundation and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. According to Ernst Wolff, in addition to the WEF, American billionaire György Soros' "Open Society Foundations" and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are the main beneficiaries of modern foundation law. This was created primarily to make it easier for the rich to avoid taxes. In addition, they can directly influence politics, the economy and society. This bypasses the parliamentary structures.

According to the "Infosperber" portal, only Klaus Schwab, the president of the WEF, receives an annual salary of about one million Swiss francs. The WEF's coffers are full of hundreds of millions of francs. However, WEF does not pay federal taxes.

The WEF is mainly financed by its 1,000 member companies. These are typically global companies whose annual turnover exceeds five billion dollars. According to the Swiss daily Südostschweiz (as of January 22, 2019), the annual membership fee is 60,000 Swiss francs. Each such company can send one representative to Davos. An additional ticket is 25,000 Swiss francs plus VAT.

Strategic partners

The WEF does not only have regular members, of course. It has 120 strategic partners. The minimum annual contribution starts at around CHF 600,000. The list of companies acting as "strategic partners" of the WEF reads like the alphabet of globalization: from Allianz to Bank of America and Credit Suisse (from June 12, 2023 UBS), from Facebook to Huawei and KPMG [explanation: KPMG is one of the four largest auditing firms in the world with an annual turnover of 32.1 billion dollars] to Microsoft, Unilever and Volkswagen. Other big names: Airbus, Alibaba, Amazon, American Express, Apple, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, BlackRock, Coca Cola, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, IKEA, JPMorgan Chase, Mastercard, Morgan Stanley, Nestlé, New York Times, Open Society Foundations, PayPal, SAP, Siemens, TikTok, Time, UBS, Zurich Insurance Group and many others. Of course, pharmaceutical companies such as Novartis, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Pfizer are also on the list. A full list of all WEF partners can be found on the WEF website.

WEF employs around 850 people worldwide and generated a turnover of 383 million Swiss francs in the financial year from July 2021 to June 2022. The WEF's financial reports are criticized for their lack of transparency. The seemingly substantial profits are reinvested. It is not clear how rich the Forum actually is.

3 The governance structure of the WEF

The President of the Forum is the founding and managing director, Professor Klaus Schwab. The organization is managed by a board of trustees [explanation: supervisory board or board of directors]. According to its own statement, these are "exceptional individuals who act as guardians of the Forum's mission and values ​​and oversee the Forum's work to promote true world citizenship."
Norwegian politician Borge Brende has been the president of the Forum since 2017. He was his country's Minister of Environmental Protection (from 2001 to 2004), then Minister of Economy and Trade (until 2005) and Minister of Foreign Affairs until 2017. Brende is a member of the Bilderberg Group and its steering committee. [Explanation: The highest decision-making body]

Members of the WEF Board of Trustees

The selection of members is hardly accidental, as their networking shows. The members of the board of trustees are

Ajay Banga - Indian-American manager. President of the World Bank from 2023. He is a member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, the influential political advisory think tank founded by Zbigniew Brzeziński and David Rockefeller.

Marc Benioff - American entrepreneur. He is the president and CEO of the publicly traded software company Salesforce. His private wealth in 2022 is estimated at about 8.1 billion dollars. Member of the CFR.

Thomas Buberl - German manager and CEO of the AXA insurance group. Participant of the 2017, 2019 and 2022 Bilderberg meetings.

Laurence D. Fink - American-American entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman and CEO of BlackRock, the world's largest asset management company. The group's assets under management amounted to USD 8.70 trillion at the end of 2020. Fink is also a member of the Trilateral Commission and the CFR Board of Directors.

Orit Gadiesh - American-Israeli manager and president of Bain & Company, one of the world's largest management consulting firms. He participated in the 1997 and 1998 Bilderberg meetings and is also a member of the CFR.

Kristalina Georgieva - Bulgarian politician and economist. Director General of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Participant of the 2016 Bilderberg meeting.

André Hoffmann - Swiss entrepreneur. Since 2006, he has been vice-chairman of the board of Roche Holding AG (Switzerland), one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Member of the "Római Klub" and participant of the 2019 Bilderberg conference.

Joe Kaeser - German manager. CEO of Siemens between 2013-2021. As CEO of Siemens, he earned 9.27 million euros in 2020. European member of the Trilateral Commission. He participated in the Bilderberg Conference in 2015 and 2016.

Christine Lagarde - French lawyer. President of the European Central Bank (ECB) since 2019. Member of the Bilderberg Group and participant of the 2009, 2013, 2014, 2016 and 2017 Bilderberg meetings.

David M. Rubenstein - American-American entrepreneur. He is the co-founder and co-chairman of one of the world's largest private equity investment companies, the Carlyle Group. His net worth is estimated at $3.2 billion in 2019. Member of the Trilateral Commission. Participant of the 2017 Bilderberg meeting. He is also currently the president of the CFR.

Al Gore - American politician and environmentalist. He did not attend a Bilderberg meeting, but he plays a pioneering role in the climate agenda. His film "An Inconvenient Truth" (2006) toured the whole world and schools. In 2007, a London court ruled that students should be made aware of the flaws in the film's content. For example, that the melting of West Antarctic and Greenland glaciers will not cause dramatic sea level rise "in the near future," as Gore's film claims. The father of two school children, who filed a lawsuit, called the film "brainwashing" that has no place in schools.

On the networking of the CFR, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Committee

Participation in the Bilderberg meeting runs like a red thread through the members of the WEF's board of trustees [explanation: supervisory body or board of directors]. It is therefore worth examining the networking of the CFR, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission at this point. You can find out from the following Kla.TV program: "Bilderberg Group - the secret shadow government?

The strategic plan for the establishment of the Bilderberg Club comes from the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]. The CFR is a private American think tank founded in 1921 - which, as a kind of shadow government, pulls the strings in the US Henry Kissinger recalls the origins of the Bilderberg Club like this: "We met 60 years ago as part of a study group of the Council on Foreign Relations. Shortly thereafter, he (David Rockefeller) advocated the creation of a discussion group, which later became what we know today as the Bilderberg Group".
David Rockefeller was the director of the Council on Foreign Relations until 1985, and then, until his death, the honorary chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. Henry Kissinger ( *1923) was present at the birth of the Bilderberg Club. He always held a strong position at the Bilderberg conferences.
He was one of David Rockefeller's closest allies until Kissinger's death. He is a long-time member of the CFR and was a member of the CFR leadership from 1977-1981. 100. on the occasion of his birthday, Kla.TV screened the documentary "100 Years of Henry Kissinger - Global Strategist and War Criminal?"

The Bilderberg Group was created on the initiative of David Rockefeller (1915-2017). David Rockefeller was the chairman and main shareholder of the former largest American bank in the world, Chase Manhattan, today's JP Morgan Chase. Under his leadership, Chase Manhattan Bank became a central pillar of the international financial system. Throughout his life, Rockefeller followed the plan of a world government under the leadership of big finance. In his memoirs, he wrote: "Some even believe that we are part of a secret conspiracy working against the interests of the United States, and my family and I are labeled as 'internationalists' and conspirators who, along with others around the world, are building a more globally integrated political and economic structure." "A world, if you like. If these are the charges, I plead guilty and I'm proud of it."

To achieve this goal, David Rockefeller initiated various organizations and think tanks whose "foresight" influences international politics: in addition to the Bilderberg group, he founded the Trilateral Commission together with Henry Kissinger and the global strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Trilateral Commission dates back to the 1972 Bilderberg meeting, at which David Rockefeller proposed its establishment. Many of the Bilderberg members also joined the Trilateral Commission.

Interim Conclusion

Up to this point, it is clear that the origins of the WEF can be traced back to global strategists such as David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. To achieve their goal of a centralized world government, they created think tanks to influence international politics. Starting with the CFR, it gave rise to the Bilderberg Group and later the Trilateral Committee. The WEF should be seen as another piece of the puzzle to achieve their world government goals.

4 What were the aims of the WEF?

The WEF can be considered a modern form of think tank created to bypass parliamentary structures and influence international politics. Financial expert Ernst Wolff writes in his book, I quote: "The WEF plays a special role here, because its example is an excellent example of how parliamentarism has been increasingly eroded and doomed to ineffectiveness in recent decades. Its history also shows that the course of the world is increasingly determined by forces and which no one chooses and which the public often knows little about."

The task of the WEF

Hear the statement of Ivo Sasek, the founder of Kla.TV:
"The mission of the WEF is the global implementation of the NWO (New World Order) agenda with the help of large corporations. The entire corporate elite is concentrated in the WEF - including the central pharmaceutical companies that play a key role under Corona." "
... and although the WEF is not a public institution,


5 WEF initiatives to achieve its goals and plan

The key strategic initiatives of the modern era have always been presented through the WEF platform . , the "EVENT 201" October 2019 pandemic exercise - i.e. the coronavirus dictatorship, the Great Reboot, transhumanism, etc.

The relevance of each initiative is discussed below:

Year 1968 - Club of Rome - Climate Dictatorship

At the 1964 Bilderberg meeting (March 22-24., Virginia, USA) David Rockefeller, Max Kohnstamm and Aurelio Peccei met to find the best ways to reduce population. The starting point was the next initiative and use of global crises. [S&G 26/2023] Finally, in 1968 a Bilderberg- meeting (April 26-28, 1968, Canada) David Rockefeller and Aurelio Peccei founded the "Club of Rome." Both were on the list of participants of the 1964 and 1968 Bilderberg meetings. Aurelio Peccei (1908-1984) was an Italian tycoon. He was one of the leaders of Fiat and the president of Olivetti and Italcon.

According to Ernst Wolff, Peccei was the most respected speaker at the 1973 WEF meeting, who summarized the most important themes of the book "The Limits of Growth" in his speech. This was originally the "Club of Rome" report on the state of humanity, published in 1972.
In his speech, Peccei spoke of global overpopulation as the biggest problem facing humanity, and from this he derived the need to reduce the world's population.

Klaus Schwab made the following statement in an interview:
"I've been dealing with climate change since 1973. I'm only telling you because I was the one who gave the Club of Rome or the Club of Rome its first big platform!" In other words, "I've been working on climate change since 1973. Just to tell you, because I was the person who gave the 'Club of Rome' its first big platform!"

Year 2000 - GAVI, the Vaccine Dictatorship of the Vaccine Alliance

[Explanation: GAVI stands for "Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization"]

The association was founded on January 29, 2000 at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Its purpose: to counterbalance the stagnant, and in some cases even decreasing, immunization rates in the world's poorest countries since the end of the 1990s. Ernst Wolff writes in his book [79. page] that the founding of GAVI was "by far the most important event at the first meeting of the new millennium." I quote Wolff: "The initiators of the foundation were the WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (as well as the Rockefeller Foundation [page 81]). The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided 750 million dollars in initial funding to the association. "

According to GAVI's press release issued on January 23, 2020, the politicians of the leading industrialized countries assured the GAVI Vaccine Association of their support. This was part of a series of 20th anniversary celebrations held at the World Economic Forum. German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced a funding pledge of 600 million euros for the period 2021-2025.

In an interview with Kla.TV in June 2022, Wolff defines another important goal of GAVI:
"What makes it even more interesting is that in 2017 this GAVI together with Microsoft and some other companies founded ID2020, i.e. Digital Identity Alliance, that is, the digital identity alliance, which serves to promote digital identity. And the dream of every digital company is to give every person in the world their own digital identity. And behind this is GAVI and Microsoft, that is, Bill Gates and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is there. What's interesting is that if you look at it - GAVI is a medical organization - then you would assume that the head of GAVI is probably a doctor. But this is far from the case, the head of GAVI is none other than José Manuel Barroso, the former EU Commission its leader, who is also a classmate of Bill Gates and Angela Merkel in the WEF cadre factory [i.e. Young Global Leaders]. And by the way, this man is also an advisor to Goldman Sachs since 2016. And the main shareholder of Goldman Sachs is none other than BlackRock - so the circle".

Year 2005 - Young Global Leaders ["Young Global Leaders"]

According to the WEF website, Klaus Schwab founded the "Young Global Leaders" (YGL) forum in 2004. It emerged from the "Global Leaders of Tomorrow" community that existed between 1993 and 2003. Quote: "More than 1,400 members and alumni from 120 countries include innovative figures in business and society, entrepreneurs, technology pioneers, educators, activists, artists, journalists and many others." The goal is "creating and shaping a better, more sustainable future." According to his own information, the members maintain the "2030 initiative." The purpose of this is to develop an action plan to realize the 2030 vision of an ideal world.

Ernst Wolff writes the following in his book "World Economic Forum - The world power in the background": [64-65. page] "For the first time, the elite began to purposefully select their own young talents, systematically train them, prepare them for the tasks and network them with each other. How sensationally successful the project was is shown by some names from the first cohort, which read like the later years a who's who of its political and corporate elite. They include Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, José Manuel Barroso and Bill Gates. As the next 30 years have shown, this has laid the foundation for a tightly-knit network of politicians, business leaders and media professionals that is crucial influenced the course of the world."
"Russian President Vladimir Putin is not on the list of Young Global Leaders or Global Leaders for Tomorrow participants. However, Klaus Schwab himself mentioned him as a Young Global Leader in two interviews".

Klaus Schwab's original statement at WEF 2019:
"Mrs Merkel, Tony Blair, all of them, even President Putin, were all 'Young Global Leaders' at one time! Together with them, Chancellor Kurz and the Prime Minister of New Zealand, here are the three youngest heads of government! "
Wolff also pointed out another characteristic in an interview with Kla.TV in June 2022:
"It is interesting that during the Corona crisis they acted particularly hard. So in Germany, Minister of Health Jens Spahn, in Austria former Chancellor Kurz, in France Mr. Macron, in Canada Justin Trudeau , and Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand. They've all taken a very extreme approach and they're all young global leaders at the WEF".

Find out who are the people in your country who are driving the WEF agenda and who have been strategically trained by the WEF. The document containing the list of all 3,800 "young global leaders" between 1993-2023 can be found under the program.

Year 2007 - Annual Meeting of New Champions

In 2007, the WEF introduced the "Annual Meeting of New Champions", which is held every year in China and is also known as "summer Davos". These are representatives of "global growth companies". These are flagship companies in fast-growing emerging markets such as China and India, as well as fast-starting companies in industrialized countries.

Year 2011 - Global Shapers

In 2011, the WEF established the worldwide "Global Shapers" network for high-potential individuals between the ages of 20 and 30 who will play a leading role in society in the future. The "Global Shapers Community" consists of self-organized local hubs (ie hubs) in major cities around the world.

Ernst Wolff's original statement in an interview with Kla.TV:
"Meanwhile, the WEF is going one step further; now it has launched a new program that has been running for about 10 years. These are the Young Global Shapers. There are currently 10,000 of them worldwide. They are young start-up entrepreneurs who they can only be between 20 and 30 years old".

WEF's "Global Shapers" program should be seen as an additional tool for the global governance agenda of WEF supporters.

Year 2016 - Transhumanism

New technologies were discussed at the WEF's 2016 annual meeting, from "gene editing" to artificial intelligence to 3D printing. "Gene editing" is an umbrella term for molecular biological techniques for the targeted modification of DNA, including the genetic material of plants, animals and humans. According to the WEF website, the following questions were asked:
"How will these technologies change the lives of the next generation?".
"How will these technologies change business, government and society?"
"How can people and technology work together to achieve better results?"

Financial expert Ernst Wolff comments:
"Schwab's book 'The Fourth Industrial Revolution' was published at the 2016 annual meeting and later translated into 30 languages. Its basic message was that the merging of technologies from the physical, digital and biological worlds is completely it creates new possibilities. [...] Despite his warnings about the dangers of development, Schwab has openly embraced transhumanism in numerous interviews, describing the fusion of the human body and the digital realm as an evolutionary development."

In a 2016 video, Klaus Schwab explained what he meant by the "fourth industrial revolution": [German translation] "The industrial revolution will completely affect our lives. It will not only change our communication [...] but also our own identity ".
["It will be like a tsunami, and in fact not only a digital revolution, of course digital, physical - nanotechnology, but also biological.""

American inventor Ray Kurzweil, CTO of Google LLC, described the plans of humanism as follows:
"The the fusion of man and machine, with the sudden explosion of machine intelligence, will lead to a world where there will no longer be a difference between biological and machine life, or between physical and virtual reality". At
this point, it is important to stop for a moment and think about , what this means and what the consequences are: This opens the door to the manipulation, control and control of humanity by anonymous programmers. Nothing would stand in the way of a centralized "one world dictatorship"!

Year 2019 - Agenda 2030

On June 13, 2019, Klaus Schwab, Director of the World Economic Forum, and António Guterres, Secretary General of the United Nations, signed a partnership between their two organizations. The purpose of the partnership is to accelerate the implementation of the 17 sustainable development goals. These are United Nations (UN) policy goals and came into force on 1 January 2016. The official German title is: "Transforming our world: Agenda for sustainable development until 2030", abbreviated "Agenda 2030".

In principle, this means that the power to shape the global future has been handed over to large global corporations and their owners. The agreement also states that the "fourth industrial revolution" of the World Economic Forum is an important element in the implementation of the 2030 agenda.

Călin Georgescu is a Romanian citizen and a former high-ranking member of the UN. In the program of Kla.TV on March 11, 2023, he revealed what is behind the UN agenda.

Here is a summary from the introduction of the Kla.TV program:
"The United Nations, in alliance with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and others, is currently working on the global implementation of the 2030 Agenda. This is the largest transformation ever planned, planned en masse for all countries and all peoples , and aims to change every aspect of human society: finance, economy, agriculture, food, travel, sexuality, education, etc. The ultimate goal of the 2030 Agenda is to create a One World Government with unelected leaders.The United Nations with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum are at the heart of this planned world government. Above them are financial interest groups that operate in complete secrecy so that no one can ever hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity."

Year 2019 - Event 201 - Corona Dictatorship

According to the Johns Hopkins University website, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in collaboration with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, organized the 201st event on October 18, 2019 in New York .
The event focused on a fictitious case, a severe global pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus called nCov-19. The pandemic exercise focused on situations where public-private partnerships are needed to manage such pandemics. Ten weeks later, China reported the first cases of Covid-19 to the WHO.

Year 2020 - Great Reset - Digital Dictatorship

The Great Restart refers to the initiative of the World Economic Forum, which aims to transform the world economy and global society in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In his book, Ernst Wolff summarized what it was all about: [133. page] "A full four months after the declaration of the global pandemic (July 9, 2020), Klaus Schwab presented his work entitled "COVID-19: The Great Reset", which he co-authored with the writer Thierry Malleret. [...] Along with his book, Schwab presented the 'Great Restart Initiative', with which the WEF, in cooperation with its partners, aims to manage the construction of the world after COVID-19. It is worth noting that the coronavirus crisis is considered only a temporary phenomenon within the framework of this initiative. [...] The main focus is placed on two other issues : On climate change and the fourth industrial revolution."
[144-145. page] "The introduction of digital central bank currencies is a central element of the Great Restart. This is currently being prepared in the background worldwide and is supported by the WEF. [...] Concretely, the project looks like this: Every citizen and every company has only one central should have a bank account. This would allow the state to centrally determine the money supply, direct and control the flow of money, and set interest rates as needed. [...] Citizens will very quickly realize that the state not only it can track every single transaction, but also impose individual interest rates, individual tax rates or penalties, tie the money [...] to a Chinese-style social credit system, or completely cut them off from all money movement."

A 2016 video from the World Economic Forum (WEF) shows where the introduction of digital central bank currencies could lead - including being cut off from all financial flows. It was published under the title "8 Predictions for the World in 2030".

"You will have nothing and you will be happy," says one of the sentences in the video. It was based on an essay by the Danish politician Ida Auken.

The video was removed from the WEF website because it caused too many protests. However, it can be viewed on the WEF Facebook page.

On November 10, 2016, in an article published in "Forbes" magazine, the WEF defined how the phrase "You will own nothing and be happy" should be understood. Quote: "Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my town - or should I say our town. I don't own anything. I don't have my own car. I don't have a house. I don't have any tools or clothes. It may seem strange to you, but for us in this city it's perfectly understandable. Everything you thought was a product has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and everything we need in our daily lives. One by one, all these things have become free, so no it made sense


Listen to Kla-TV founder Ivo Sasek on Kla.TV's program of 18.06.2021:
"To the outside world, the WEF presents itself with various videos - it couldn't be more impudent - that make the overthrow of the old world order palatable for the world's population, or at least they should. After the harsh criticism, some of these videos were quickly deleted. They glorified the impoverishment of the peoples, imagine something like this, they presented the complete disenfranchisement of all of us as an inspiring event, you understand, our disenfranchisement as desirable, as if beautified in a modern way".

Ivo Sasek also put a pragmatic solution on the table, as he explained on March 16, 2023: "As the entire population of the world, let's say yes loud and clear to the Great Reboot of Klaus Schwab and his minions. But as a global democracy, let's first make that decision , to test this Great Reboot for at least 20 years on all its inventors and propagandists - that is, Klaus Schwab and all his WEF colleagues -".

6 Other players of the WEF in order to realize their goals and agenda

In addition to the already mentioned global players and large world companies, two other key players should be mentioned.
It is important to keep in mind that these and other actors do not operate independently, but were created by the same global actors.

China China

was practically ruled by Deng Xiaoping between 1978-1997. When he initiated the shift from a centrally planned economy to capitalism in December 1978, Klaus Schwab responded immediately. Schwab immediately invited Deng Xiaoping to the next Davos Symposium in 1979.
Ernst Wolff wrote in his book: [96. page] "2009 was the 30th year that a Chinese delegation participated in the Davos meeting. Meanwhile, almost all Chinese heads of state and party leaders paid their respects at the WEF. The Beijing office of the WEF worked closely with the National Development and Research Commission of China, the Chinese with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and several large Chinese companies."
[139. page] "At the virtual meeting organized in January 2021, which took place under the motto 'Great Restart' [...] Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a video message."
[139. page] "If we look at the list of new applicants admitted to the ranks of Young Global Leaders between 2020 and 2022, it is striking that after the USA, China provided the largest contingent, and that an above-average number of candidates come from the financial sector. This is no coincidence, since the WEF wants both to play a defining role in the Great Reboot in the near future."
[143-145. page] The fact that China has played a decisive role for the WEF for decades [...] is due to the fact that despite the transition from a planned economy to a market economy, China has retained the centralized structures from the Maoist era. As a result, the Chinese government is much more authoritarian than its parliamentary counterparts. This was particularly evident during the coronavirus crisis, during which the Beijing regime acted with iron fists and ordered the longest and strictest lockdown in the world. But this is also evident in relation to another project being prepared in the background and supported by the WEF: the introduction of digital central bank currencies, which is a central element of the Great Reboot."

On Kla.TV's program - China, this ruling system threatens us all ! - China's role was summarized as follows:
"With its social credit system, China is the pioneer and model of the Great Restart envisioned by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF). This system is a mass surveillance system implemented with the help of artificial intelligence, and is thus the perfecting of the system of coercive rule created by Mao. The behavior and reliability of individual people as well as companies and organizations are constantly monitored and evaluated. By rewarding good behavior for those in power and punishing any misbehavior, they force every single person to act one hundred percent for those in power. In the meantime, Europe's first social credit system has already been introduced in Bologna, Italy, and the EU Commission is already preparing the introduction of this control and education system.

" Skull & Bones was funded and built by the secret society Lord Rothschild and later the Rockefeller Foundation. Skull & Bones was originally a student union at Yale University and formed the inner circle of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In the early 20th century, "Yale-in -China" founded a series of schools and hospitals in China. According to the research of the Swiss Express newspaper (October 2022 number 50), it was "Yale-in-China" that the Marxists and Mao Zedong (1893-1976) Chinese dictator (1893-1976) paved the way to power. British historian Antony C. Sutton wrote as early as 1986: "By the year 2000, Communist China will be a 'superpower' built with American technology and expertise".

Renowned scholar Sutton also shows how the American Red Cross infiltrated Russia in the early 19th century. This was also seized by the forces of big finance. The October Revolution of 1917 - which ended Tsarism and ushered in Communism - was carefully orchestrated by the financial elite, especially the Rothschilds, and supported with huge financial resources. Sutton shows how the banking circles around the American central bank built almost the entire heavy industry of the Soviet Union.

Russia

came to power in 1986, the year before, under the leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet Union participated in the WEF meeting in Davos for the first time. At that time, it was still organized under the name "European Management Forum" until 1987.

Klaus Schwab has been a long-standing friend of Russian President Vladimir Putin since the 1990s. According to Politico magazine, Putin and his predecessor in the presidency, Dmitry Medvedev, spoke at the WEF five times between 2007 and 2021. Schwab said: "The WEF has built an excellent relationship with the Russian Federation. Both with the business world and with the government." According to an insider, the Russian companies paid the WEF about 600,000 francs a year as a "strategic partner", and in return they could help develop the program.

In 2018, the WEF jointly established a "cyber security center" with the Russian IT security company BI.ZONE. BI.ZONE is a subsidiary of Russia's largest financial institution, Sberbank. The annual online exercise called "Cyber ​​Polygon" took place under his leadership, the purpose of which was to practice cyber attacks and defense against them.

The sanctioned Russians were not invited to the WEF in May 2022 due to the war in Ukraine. For the first time since the Gorbachev era, there was no Russian participation at the WEF. In addition, the two Russian banks, Sberbank and VTB, as well as the Russian energy company Gazprom, were removed from the list of "strategic partners".

However, it should be noted that the same global agenda promoted by the WEF and the globalist elite is being implemented in Russia:

- Russia has always been at the forefront of the fight against the alleged COVID epidemic and, like other countries, has encouraged the population to get vaccinated.

- Russia takes a leading role in the introduction of central bank digital currency, or CBDC for short. The digital ruble will be introduced throughout the country in 2024. CBDC can be considered as one of the building blocks of total control and supervision.

- Russia, together with China, is one of the main supporters of the creation of a new global financial and monetary system under the control of the IMF.

- Russia plays a leading role as a supervisory state. Moscow and St. Petersburg are among the ten most watched cities outside of China. Moscow authorities introduced a street camera system supported by facial recognition software in 2017 and 2018. During the 2020 coronavirus crisis, the authorities were able to track down and punish people who left their homes in violation of the lockdown rules.

- Russia plays a leading role in the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda and the Great Restart. As it appeared on the website of the "Executive Office of the Russian President", Russia is advancing the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda. This is the result of a joint declaration with the People's Republic of China on global sustainable development. This was issued on February 4, 2022, on the occasion of Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Beijing. On the same day, he participated in the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games. The joint statement mentions by name: "poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and disease control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development including green development, industrialization, digital economy and infrastructure connectivity" .

Just as the above-mentioned global actors and initiatives of China or the WEF prove to be a means of building a centralized world dictatorship, it must be observed whether this applies to Russia as well.

7 The WEF in a Nutshell

Below we list and summarize the most important points:

- The WEF is not simply a Swiss foundation created and built by an independent Klaus Schwab.

- In 1966/1967, during his years at Harvard Business School, Schwab came under the influence of his professor, Henry Kissinger.

- The "European Management Symposium" - the predecessor of the WEF - was born from a CIA-funded Harvard program under the leadership of Henry Kissinger and was established in Switzerland with the support of John Kenneth Galbraith and Herman Kahn. All three are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think tank.

- All persons involved in the creation or senior management structure of the WEF are members of the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) or the Trilateral Commission, or more.

- Each office is run by the same supporters and their successors, be it David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Laurence Douglas "Larry" Fink or David Rubenstein and many other wealthy global figures.

- When it was founded in 1971, the WEF was given the task of implementing the New World Order (NWO) agenda worldwide with the help of large global corporations. In the meantime, the entire elite of global conglomerates gathered here.

- The World Economic Forum (WEF) has been made one of the most important centers of influence in world politics by the above-mentioned world leaders. The WEF has launched various initiatives that serve as tools to promote globalization. This sets the stage for a future centralized world dictatorship.

- Some of the most important such initiatives: the Club of Rome in relation to the climate dictatorship, the GAVI vaccination association in relation to the vaccination dictatorship, the "EVENT 201" October 2019 pandemic exercise - i.e. the coronavirus dictatorship, the Great Restart, transhumanism, etc. But actors like China and Russia also serve as instruments of the WEF's agenda and are at the forefront of pushing the agenda forward.

- The goal of the "Great Reboot" announced by the founder of the WEF is to lead all citizens of the world into a new digital age driven by artificial intelligence. The "Great Reset" means something like this: A world in which no one owns anything anymore, in which everyone is completely observed, yet completely dependent and therefore controllable.

- The program of transhumanism - the merging of human bodies with the digital sphere - paves the way for the manipulation, control and control of humanity. Paving the way for a centralized world dictatorship!

So much for the most important points. Given that the threads of the WEF run to the same networked control centers and wire-pullers, and given that the goals of the WEF initiatives outlined here are unmistakably in favor of a global agenda, it is very possible to speak of an actual world conspiracy.

This is not a global conspiracy by a few protagonists such as the US government, Russia or China, but by a few global think tanks. What they have in common is that they are deeply involved in the secret society of Freemasonry. One of the most powerful and world-leading original lodges, the "THREE EYES" was founded by David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzeziński.
It is known from the discoveries of the Italian high-ranking freemason Gioele Magaldi that the former Chinese party leader Deng Xiaoping (1904-1997) was initiated into freemasonry and became a member of the original lodge of the "THREE EYES". As a result, according to Gioele Magaldi, every party leader since 1980 - including China's current president, Xi Jinping - was a member of the original lodges in which the high-ranking Freemasons are organized.

It is also known that the most important Russian actors were or still are members of the super lodges. For example, Joseph Stalin (1878-1953), Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870-1924), Leo Trotsky (1879-1940), Mikhail Gorbachev (1931-2022), Boris Yeltsin (1931-2007) and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This was revealed in Kla.TV's show "World Threat: Freemasonry of the Highest Degree" [https://www.kla.tv/23990].
Finally, see the show's conclusion: "It seems that there is only one way to bring this century-old world conspiracy under control in time: The deceived and plundered world community must write down the names of all its plunderers, so that in a light life decreed by the people - so to speak, at a Nuremberg 2.0 - they can be condemned and disenfranchised. Before these world conspirators can take away the last possessions and freedom of the peoples, the peoples must condemn these insidious robbers for all their goods and lands - most of the world's land is already theirs anyway - and even confiscate all their capital."

Like the breaking of dawn, the hidden plans and machinations of the WEF become visible. Be a part of this dawn! Help spread these revelations worldwide and stop the WEF and its masterminds!

Ernst Wolff's commentary on the farmers' demonstrations. In recent years, the situation of farmers has worsened even more. Farmers are cornered from all sides like a drummer. The planned elimination of tax incentives for agricultural diesel is the final straw. Financial expert Ernst Wolff puts the farmers' protests in Germany into a broader context. The current developments are only the tip of the iceberg of a global agenda.

The cancellation of the diesel discount was the straw that broke the camel's back for the farmers. Their protest summarizes the concerns of the entire SME sector. Politics is completely disconnected from the reality of people's lives. Financial expert Ernst Wolff puts the current developments related to the farmers' protests in Germany into a broader context. In his opinion, there is much more involved than the abolition of tax incentives.

Tedros, the head of the WHO, explained last year: "Our food systems harm the health of people and the planet. Food systems are responsible for more than 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and nearly a third of the global burden of disease. Transforming food systems is therefore essential." The UN's 2030 Agenda, adopted in 2015, states: "We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps urgently needed to move the world on a path towards sustainability and resilience..." Here it

becomes to make it clear that current politics is not the real problem: it is the global transformation and increasing monopolization of food supply under the guise of climate protection. Financial expert Ernst Wolff analyzes the current developments surrounding the farmers' protests as follows:

Hello, I'm Ernst Wolf. The German Farmers' Association, together with the provincial farmers' associations, is calling for a nationwide week of action from January 8, the culmination of which will be the large demonstration in Berlin on January 15. The official reason is the government coalition's planned elimination of tax incentives for agricultural diesel and vehicle tax.

Farmers' anger is not surprising considering that they have been under increasing pressure for years. As a result, more and more small and medium-sized farms have to give up and make way for large agricultural companies. Expressed in numbers, the situation is as follows: While there were still around 390,000 farms in Germany in 1995, in 2020, a quarter of a century later, there were only around 240,000. The data for the European Union are even more alarming. Between 2005 and 2020, i.e. in just 15 years, the number of farms will decrease from 14.4 million to 9.1 million. This corresponds to a decrease of approximately 37 percent. As can be seen, a rapidly advancing concentration process took place in both agriculture and industry at the expense of small and medium-sized enterprises, and thus a strong redistribution took place from the bottom up.

In the last three years, the situation of farmers has become even more acute. In addition to the structural change already described, supply chains also collapsed as a result of the closures. In addition, the lack of tokens has made it more difficult to maintain and repair agricultural machinery, road tolls and CO2 taxes have increased, fertilizers have become more expensive, especially as a result of the war in Ukraine, and borrowing has become more difficult due to the increase in interest rates by the European Central Bank. But that's not all. This barrage of problems has also worsened. Namely through new and new bureaucratic rules and regulations. Almost all in the name of the climate. However, it is no coincidence that more and more farmers lose the fight for survival and become victims of international agricultural companies.

We are currently experiencing a global economic and social turning point, the dawn of the digital age. However, we are led into this era by a vanishingly small minority. And without the majority having any input. This minority, a cartel of huge financial and IT companies, is pursuing a number of goals that are now being referred to as the "Great Reboot". They want to register all of us biometrically, they want to force new money on us, i.e. digital central bank money, and they want to completely reorganize agriculture. He wants to achieve all this with the so-called intelligent management. This includes the automation of the work of tractors and equipment, the use of drones or work robots, and the use of artificial intelligence, for example through the use of algorithms in crop production. But that's not all.

The Great Start in the field of agriculture is primarily based on the results of synthetic biology, i.e. genetically modified seeds and, more recently, meat grown in the laboratory. All of this is sold to us by the protagonists of the Great Reboot as actions they are taking in our interest to combat climate change. Seeds are supposed to be manipulated to make plants resilient to climate change. And lab-grown meat should replace normal meat. Because cattle, pigs and sheep emit too much methane. All this is not satire, but bitter reality. Behind this is a billion-dollar business, in which many large investors have already entered. But this also means the complete subordination of agriculture to these investors. Because the licenses and patents for both climate-resistant seeds and climate-neutral, laboratory-grown meat do not go to the farmers, but to the representatives of the cartel. We should realize that smart agriculture will do as little to save the world as the rest of the climate agenda. Smart farming is nothing more than big business for the benefit of a tiny minority, and it means the end of agriculture as we know it. Politicians play a particularly inglorious role in this fatal development, as they have almost completely subjugated themselves to the Great Reset agenda.

The Greens, who currently hold the Ministry of Economy and Agriculture, have proven to be the biggest opponents of farmers within the German traffic light coalition. They seem to know no bounds when it comes to cornering farmers more and more and rolling out the red carpet for big investors.
But what does the farmers' association think about this development? It's hard to believe, but the farmers' association is not only powerless against this, but even encourages it. Its website states that it supports all of the UN's climate goals and climate summit objectives, and fully supports their CO2 program. It was even among the exhibitors and sponsors at the Green Party conference in Karlsruhe in November. But what prompted the farmers' association to call for a week of action in January 2024 combined with a large-scale demonstration? Presumably especially the growing discontent of small and medium-sized farms, which has manifested itself in a number of local and regional protest actions in recent weeks and months, which in turn threaten to erupt into conflagration. It can therefore be assumed that the farmers' association does not respond to the protests entirely voluntarily, but out of sheer self-preservation, and is forced to give in to pressure from below.

Does this mean that these objections should be dismissed? No, on the contrary. If they really want to help farmers, they need to use all of next week to provide them with factual information so that they realize that there is much more at stake than the removal of tax credits, that they want to strip them of the foundations of their entire profession, and that if they succeed want to defend themselves against the Great Restart, then they cannot entrust their fate to the officials of the farmers' association.

Almost everyone believes that "fossil fuels" come from fossils, that is, ancient organic matter kept underground for thousands of years, from forests, jungles, plankton, or dinosaurs, which turn into oil, gas, and coal.
But if hydrocarbons or "fossil fuels" are made from fossil materials, why are they found deep under the oceans and on top of the Earth? Or why one of Saturn's moons has more natural oil and gas than Earth?

So, if all hydrocarbons come from non-fossil materials, where do they come from? And what does this tell us about proposed and implemented climate change policies?

These questions play a central role in proposals for the future of the world's energy use. To provide some answers, Dr. Willie Soon joined Tucker Carlson to discuss fossil fuels in space, the false climate change narrative, global warming throughout history, the forces destroying science, and proof of God's existence.

Dr. Willie Soon is an American astrophysicist and earth scientist. He is a group leader at CERES Science and a leading authority on the relationship between solar phenomena and global climate. For more than 32 years, he has been studying Sun-Earth relations not only in terms of meteorology and climate, but also in terms of the orbital dynamics of Sun-Earth-other planets interactions, magmatic (volcanoes) and tectonic (earthquakes) activities.

In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Dr. Soon explained that much of what we've been told about energy and climate is false. "I [would say] that 80-90% of the articles published today in so-called 'climate science' should not be published," he said.

At the end of the interview, he spoke briefly about what examples he sees of evidence for God in the field of mathematics.

We should not assume that all hydrocarbons on Earth are "fossil fuels".

There are two basic theories for the origin of petroleum: biotic and abiotic.

According to the biotic theory, the oil and gas drilled out of the ground comes from the remains of plants and animals trapped underground millions of years ago. These "fossil fuels" took thousands of years to form, and we use them up much faster than they are regenerated.

The abiotic theory is an opposing view supported by considerable evidence. As noted in a previous article, this theory dates back centuries, and one of its prominent champions is Dmitri Mendeleev, who is best known for inventing the periodic table.

As with all theories, it is not clear whether it is one or the other. While Dr. Soon agrees that hydrocarbons are formed from fossil materials, he says there is significant evidence that this is not the only way hydrocarbons are formed.

As Dr. Soon noted, we don't yet know what percentage of Earth's hydrocarbons were formed from biological fossils and what percentage from non-biological (abiogenic) processes.

This does not necessarily mean that our accessible hydrocarbon reserves are unlimited. On the other hand, however, the broad debates about "limited resources" and "renewable energies" are often unscientific and unrealistic.

On Titan, Saturn's largest moon, where the temperature is -290 degrees Fahrenheit (-179 degrees Celsius), NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency have found an ocean of liquid methane.

Methane is a hydrocarbon that is a major component of natural gas. Climate activists label it a "potent greenhouse gas."

As Dr. Soon asked: If Titan's temperature is -290oF, with an ocean's worth of "strong greenhouse gases" inside, where is the global warming?

No fossils have been found on Titan. The methane ocean found on Titan proves beyond doubt that the abiogenic theory is true, Dr. Soon said. As further evidence, Dr. Soon described an experiment conducted in Sweden in 2009. This showed that when methane ("CH4") is subjected to high pressure and temperature to simulate conditions in the Earth's mantle, complex hydrocarbons such as benzene and ethane can be formed.

Titan is not the only planet where hydrocarbons have been found. For example, methane has been found in the atmosphere of Jupiter and benzene in the rocks of Mars. Complex hydrocarbons called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been found in interstellar and intergalactic space. "It's everywhere," Dr. Soon said.

The narrative that so-called "fossil fuels" whose existence is limited by the amount of fossils or decaying organic matter is not true, he said.

So why do people think that hydrocarbons are finite "fossil fuels"?

"The world is full of untruths and half-truths," said Dr. Soon. "We are not constrained or constrained by the availability of, say, gasoline, petroleum, or coal."

At COP28 in Dubai, "they just announced that we need to get rid of fossil fuels, basically petroleum, natural gas and even coal," Dr. Soon said. "I mean, these people are really crazy now, really crazy. I think they're going to hurt [many] people with their [self]delusions".

"We need" "a lot of illegal immigrants" as America's population is "shrinking." Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) argued in a congressional hearing in favor of keeping the border open, arguing that America needs "a lot of illegal immigrants."

Nadler defended Democratic President Joe Biden's open border policy, which has ushered in a historic flood of illegal immigrants into the country.

At a hearing Thursday of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security and Enforcement, Nadler argued that "we need" foreigners to continue crossing the border illegally.

The hearing was called to discuss "The impact of illegal immigration on social services".

Nadler first argued that farms rely on illegal foreign workers to harvest crops.

"We need immigrants in this country," Nadler said.

"Let's forget that our vegetables would rot in the ground if not many immigrants - many illegal immigrants - picked them".

The representative then tried to argue that the population of American citizens is "declining" and that illegal immigrants are needed to replenish the population.

"The fact is that the birth rate in this country is well below replacement level, which means our population is going to decline," Nadler said at the hearing.

"And the number of people needing Social Security and Medicare will increase relative to the number of dependents."

Imagine if this had been said by a Republican instead of Democrat Jerry Nadler:

"Our vegetables would be rotting in the ground if it weren't for a lot of immigrants - a lot of illegal immigrants - picking them!"

Stephen Miller, a former Trump administration immigration adviser, hit back at Nadler's comments in a post on X.

"Yes, millions of illegal immigrants from all over the world, from over 150 countries in the world, all go to Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, New York, etc. to work in the fields," Miller said.

"What a tired, empty, exhausted and stupid platitude," he continued.

"It's just a total impossibility."

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) also slammed Nadler.

"Immigrants do more than pick vegetables Jerry - they contribute to our economy, our culture, our community," Lawler posted on X.

"They are doctors, nurses, home health aides, lawyers, professionals, and yes, farm workers."

"No one is against immigration - but there has to be a process," he continued.



"Let's secure the border and fix our broken immigration system so that those who want to come here and contribute to our economy can do so, and do so legally."

We have been warning for years about secret tunnel systems involving prominent members of the global elite.

Now, evidence has emerged linking the illegal tunnel system found under Brooklyn's Crown Heights to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the Clinton Foundation.

Disturbing video footage shot in New York City went viral earlier this week, showing a small stained mattress being pulled out of a tunnel discovered under a Crown Heights synagogue, where, according to photos, there were also children's mattresses and high chairs in the underground hideout.


A riot broke out at a New York synagogue, which serves as the center of the Orthodox Jewish Chabad-Lubavitch movement, and a dozen people were arrested as men tried to prevent the NYPD and a team of construction workers from sealing it under the building. dug an illegal tunnel system.

While the media reported some elements of the story, they conveniently left out the parts linking key members of the global elite to ritual child abuse.

The mainstream media is determined to convince you that the tunnel system is completely innocent, and fact-checkers are forcing social media sites to delete viral threads that reveal the secret tunnels to millions of people.


There is only one problem with these charlatans. People have woken up and are demanding to know the truth.

What kind of truth is that? The Chábád-Lubavic headquarters, where the tunnel system is filled with bloody mattresses, blood-covered books and children's chairs, has close ties to Jeffrey Epstein and his child trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell.


That's right, the synagogue, which has a secret tunnel system underneath, also happens to give special privileges to Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficker while he's in prison, providing him with the best kosher meals, which are more expensive, and various other perks.

The mainstream media says it's just a wild coincidence.

The media also don't want you to know that the Chábád-Lubavic headquarters has been connected to the sexual abuse of children for decades.

Hirschel Pekkar, the leading member of Chabad who designed the world-famous menorah, admitted in 1991 that, in his words, he "did things he shouldn't have done" with a 5-year-old girl.


It is probably time to mention that the Chabad-Lubavic Synagogue is also connected with the Clinton Foundation, the two organizations work together on so-called "projects", which have been announced on both their websites over the years.

Of course, the fact that Chabad-Lubavitch headquarters is connected to the Clinton Foundation, which itself is connected to convicted child rapists, including Laura Silsby, who was found guilty of child trafficking in Haiti... Well, the mainstream media wants you to know that these facts are nothing more than a series of wild coincidences.


Note that both Epstein and Maxwell officially claim to have helped start the Clinton Foundation. Can you see the dots starting to connect?

In 2024, the truth will begin to emerge. But in order to understand what is happening before our eyes, it is important to understand the secret rituals that take place behind the curtain.

We need your help to eradicate a 9000 year old pedophile sect.

There are Adrenochrome farms in the US where children without birth certificates or international documents are trafficked and sold to the VIP elite for huge sums of money.

These children have no official documents, but have a 2-4 year "expiration period" due to how often they are raped and abused and then killed "with impunity" or ritually murdered, depending on what their owner prefers.

In 2016, news broke that a terrible snuff film about Hillary Clinton was circulating on the dark web. Law enforcement officials confirmed that the footage was so sickening that they couldn't bear to watch it for more than a few seconds.

But don't believe me. That's according to Robert David Steele, a US Marine Corps veteran and former CIA operations officer who became one of the most highly placed whistleblowers in history when he unmasked the entire global pedophilia surveillance system in front of a stunned jury.

It has long been claimed that Hollywood stars and entertainment celebrities must join the Illuminati in order to rise to the top of the industry, but few outside of the Illuminati's inner circle really understand what that means.

That is slowly starting to change as celebrities who have been subjugated by the Illuminati system break and leak inside information that exposes the true inner workings of Hollywood and the entertainment industry.

Hollywood actor Ricky Schroder is the latest celebrity to come out and expose pedophilia and occult rituals in the entertainment industry, revealing sickening details about the disturbing occult rituals he witnessed as a child star in the industry.

Ricky Schroder isn't the only star to offer a glimpse behind the curtain lately.

Nothing has changed since Angelina Jolie and Ricky Schroder tried to break into the entertainment industry at a young age. In an interview with Glamor magazine, Megan Fox revealed that she participates in the Illuminati's gruesome bloody rituals with Illuminati puppet Machine Gun Kelly.

Reports of such satanic practices involving symbols, rituals and sacrifices are ridiculed by the mainstream media.

If you read the Washington Post, watch CNN, or listen to fact-checkers, the occult practices of elite pedophiles are not a problem, secret tunnel systems are purely innocent phenomena, and those who talk about child trafficking are tinfoil-hatted lunatics who spread "fake news."

However, the evidence is undeniable and continues to mount.

In an interview with the Sunday Times, Hollywood actor Elijah Wood dropped a bombshell, noting that child actors are routinely "exploited" by industry players.

"Obviously something serious has happened in Hollywood," Wood said. "It was all organized."

What Wood is talking about is the rampant sexual abuse of child actors that was previously exposed by Corey Feldman and Corey Haim.

This narrative was so controlling that after Wood made these comments, the very next day the mainstream media attacked him and forced him to downplay them.

Fast forward a year, and another Hollywood insider came up with a similar story — with a Satanic twist.

Meet Jon Robberson. A 16-year veteran of feature, television and commercial production in Hollywood, Robberson has worked behind the scenes at all the major studios and channels, including projects by renowned producers such as Spielberg, Bruckheimer, Silver and Abrams, to name a few.

Robberson also left this scene because, according to him, it is full of predatory pedophiles.

Evidence has emerged that the segregated passageway also affects the global elite, including Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the Clintons, and we can be sure that these names are only the tip of the iceberg.

A shadowy cabal of pedophiles at the highest levels of politics, finance, and the entertainment industry use their power to hide heinous crimes against children.

There is a war going on, and the elites and their puppets in politics and entertainment are becoming more desperate by the day to crush anyone who exposes their plan.

Jeffrey Epstein targeted vulnerable children for medical experiments and data collection, involving influential individuals and organizations, raising concerns that we do not yet know the full extent of his crimes against children.

According to newly released Epstein court documents, the billionaire pedophile's companies targeted young children in the Virgin Islands and Africa for "disturbing" medical experiments.
Epstein's medical research companies conducted "transhumanist" research and were funded and supported by key allies such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, according to the documents.

Epstein and his associates, including Gates, funded initiatives that targeted "mentally ill and disadvantaged children" for programming and artificial intelligence training, similar to how he recruited underage girls for sexual exploitation, raising troubling questions about his motives. (...)

The WEF has announced the theme of its 54th Annual Meeting: Rebuilding Trust. confidence in the operation. Let's trust science...
They are identified with a proverb: "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil", first recorded in 1926 and now generally used sarcastically against those who, out of selfishness or cowardice, choose to they do not take notice of any wrongdoing.

Jan 13, 2024 Covid extremists can't stand no one listening to them

Jan 13, 2024 "Disease X" could cause next pandemic, says WHO - or Ebola, SARS or Nipah. Researchers are keeping an eye on 9 pathogens

January 13, 2024 AI & VACCINES | YUVAL NOAH HARARI, SEMICONDUCTOR, NASA, 204A COMPUTER, QUANTOM AI LAB - CLAY CLARK

January 13, 2024 THE GLOBALIST CULT EXPOSED! - JOSH SIGURDSON EXPLAINS WORLD WAR 3, TRANSHUMANISM AND THE FAKE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA

January 13, 2024 Vivek Ramaswamy | What is Vivek Ramaswamy's real origin story?

January 13, 2024 "Doomsday scenario" Fasten your seat belts, everything is coming to an end! The WEF has hit the panic button!

January 13, 2024 Are you an enemy of the state? Likely

January 13, 2024 The WEF has announced the theme of its 54th Annual Meeting: Rebuilding Trust. Operation trust. Trust The Science... Government is the truth... https://www.activistpost.com/2024/01/as-wef-prepares-for-54th-annual-meeting-international-activist-movements-offer-alternative -vision-of-2030.html

January 13, 2024 Fake Fauci Admits Fake Science and COVID Fraud

January 13, 2024 The Propaganda That Is Selective Science

January 13, 2024 Three Books to End the Silence

January 13, 2024 Canceled due to covid, now also canceled due to Israel

January 13, 2024 "Child protection is mostly about protecting children from their families": Labor council protection scandal related to the exclusion of parents and the spread of gender identity ideology in schools

January 13, 2024 When does truth become "disinformation"?

January 13, 2024 CBDCs are riddled with human rights abuses and are a new way to track citizens

January 13, 2024 Judge orders CDC to release 7.8 million text-based responses collected by V-safe- sent to

January 13, 2024 Will direct lithium mining disrupt the $90 billion lithium market?

January 13, 2024 Why aren't Covid tests working as well as they used to? "They don't work"...

January 13, 2024 Hosszú-VAXXX: The COVID-19 vaccine may be harmful even five years after the injection. A Rasmussen poll released on the day of the hearing found that 53% of Americans believe that serious side effects from vaccines lead to a large number of unexplained deaths.

COVID-19 Vaccines May Cause Harm Five Years After Injection By

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH On Friday, January 12, 2024, Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene delivered a historic US congressional panel discussion at the Rayburn Building on Capitol Hill. , to find out why the COVID-19 vaccine continues to cause record injuries, disabilities and deaths, years away from the primary series 2021...

January 13, 2024 Like in the dystopian "Planet of the Apes" movies: The gorilla and the Orangutan, or how freedom can be lost during the pandemic

One of the world's leading cardiologists has now given explosive testimony to lawmakers on Capitol Hill, revealing the devastating side effects of Covid mRNA injections. Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and several leading experts, including Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Kirk Milhoan, testified at a congressional hearing on Friday.

The hearing was called by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and focused on examining the public health risks of the injections.

McCullough made a powerful statement in his opening statement, revealing many of the complications he has encountered among vaccinated patients.

"Yesterday I saw patients with two-meter blood clots in their legs after vaccination," McCullough testified.

He said that injecting people with the genetic code for the deadly spike protein was "the most dangerous proposition that our government agencies have ever presented to our country."

The leading expert warned that the spike protein would cause widespread damage to public health.

Dr. McCullough noted,

"Spike protein, now in 3,400 peer-reviewed studies and counting, has been shown to cause heart damage and myocarditis..." "

Spike protein is physically found in blood clots, the largest blood clots we've ever seen in clinical medicine. ."

Furthermore, McCullough detailed a disturbing observation he has witnessed among patients in his clinical practice.

He mentioned that before COVID-19, he had only seen two cases of myocarditis in his entire career.

However, he stated that the cases of myocarditis among the vaccinated increased by leaps and bounds.

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium), according to the Mayo Clinic.

Inflammation can reduce the heart's ability to pump blood.

It causes blood clots to form in the heart, which can lead to a stroke or heart attack.

The potentially fatal problem is a known side effect of Covid mRNA injections.

"I see myocarditis on a daily basis now," McCullough claimed.

McCullough testified that the spikes in heart damage, blood clots and strokes he is seeing are a direct result of the injections.

"Covid-19 vaccines should be removed from the market," McCullough said.

"They are not safe for human use."

McCullough went on to share the latest data on injuries caused by Covid mRNA injections.

"Spike protein, now in 3,400 peer-reviewed studies and counting, has been shown to cause heart damage and myocarditis," he said.

"Our regulatory authorities agree,

"The UK and Australia already have guidelines on how to diagnose and treat vaccine-induced myocarditis.

"It's so common," he noted.

"It accelerates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, huge blood pressure and heart rate changes. it causes a fluctuation called posterior postural tachycardia syndrome or POTS.

"It causes neurological damage, stroke, both ischemic and hemorrhagic paralytic syndromes, including Guillain-Barre syndrome, small-fiber neuropathy, tinnitus. It

causes blood clots," McCullough continued.

"The spike protein is physically found in blood clots, the largest blood clots, that we have ever seen in clinical medicine.

"Typically, a blood clot someone would get after hip surgery or on an airplane would be about one centimeter.

"It's common in my practice, yesterday I saw patients with 15 cm, 17 cm, two meter blood clots in their legs after vaccination. " WATCH!

Meanwhile, government officials, drug companies and their allies in the corporate media continue to insist that vaccines are safe for the public.

But not everyone is buying the narrative.

A new survey finds that 53% of American adults think that COVID-19 'vaccines' have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths

READ MORE: America is facing an 'autism tsunami', warns leading study

fearmongering about a red herring. Black swans, Google's "sensitive event", financial and market collapse, Pandemic 2.0, shutdowns and more. WEF January 15-19, 2024. holds its annual meeting entitled "Rebuilding trust". During the annual meeting, Jan. 2024. On the 17th, the WEF will hold a "meeting" entitled "Preparation for Disease X".

"An unknown "X" disease could claim 20 times more deaths than the coronavirus pandemic."

"what innovative efforts are needed to prepare health systems for the multiple challenges they face?" (emphasis on the multiple)

Speakers include Tedros Tedros, Director-General of the WHO, Chairman of the Board of Directors of AstraZeneca.

Jan 2024 11. - The British government presented a new vaccine facility against "Disease X".

What is "disease X"?
I also wrote two articles about X disease recently

Sep 2023 17. - Nipah simulation in 2018 (clade X), gain of function in Wuhan, Modern mRNA vaccine!

Nov.15, 2023 - Propaganda series - THE NEXT PANDEMIC, the "BIG WATER" - Nipah, Ebola & Marburg, SARS1, Machupo, "Vampire Virus", Disease X.

I am only extracting the most important points from these articles.

May 2018 JOHNS HOPKINS "CLADE X" simulation exercise
to simulate a terrorist attack by a new parainfluenza virus with the virulence of Nipah.

150 million dead in 20 months
Air travel worldwide shut down
Forced nationalization of US healthcare Emergency
deployment of military tents
limited vaccine supply
My analysis of "Disease X"
Is "Clade X" the same as "Disease X"? Yes.

By January 12, 2024, 6.99 million people have died from COVID-19 worldwide (source).

According to the WEF meeting on January 17, 2024, "Disease X" claims 20 times as many deaths, so about 140 million. Clade X simulated 150 million dead. That's close enough.

What are the options for disease X?

Clade X was a new parainfluenza virus with 60% mortality (biological weapon and terrorist release) - it has a novelty factor, not influenza, most people have no idea what this virus is.

COVID-19 JN.1 further mutated or recombined (with 30% mortality) - already spreading rapidly, and people may be more willing to accept lockdowns and stop travel as heavy propaganda is already underway.

a new mRNA vaccine can be quickly prepared for any COVID-19 variant.

H5N1 flu (56% fatality rate) - most people don't think of a deadly flu, so there is a surprise factor.

An mRNA vaccine is already mass-produced against it.

March 20, 2023 (Reuters) - Some of the world's top flu vaccine makers say they could have hundreds of millions of bird flu vaccines ready for use within months if a new strain of bird flu ever crosses the species line. A current outbreak of bird flu, known as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, has killed a record number of birds and infected mammals.

January 4, 2024: H5N1 virus found in polar bear in Alaska

January 10, 2024: First H5N1 bird flu found in mammals near Antarctica (fur and elephant seal populations)

Nipah virus (60% mortality in Wuhan Lab GOF) - pretty exotic to the point that most people have never heard of it.

the symptoms are non-specific (fever, headache, sore throat, cough).
spreads asymptomatically (how convenient)
can lead to brain swelling/encephalitis/coma (which can cause panic).
long term effects: convulsions, personality change, can die months or years after exposure (convenient to mask mRNA damage).

The mRNA-1215 vaccine has been in human trials since July 2022.

January 11, 2024: Oxford (AstraZeneca) begins trials of a Nipah vaccine against the disease with a 75% fatality rate.

WEF Jan.17, 2024 session Chairman of AstraZeneca's Board of Directors.

Marburg virus, Ebola virus
there is no recent news about Marburg (mortality rate can be up to 88%).
there is no recent news about the Ebola virus (mortality rate approx. 50%).

Viruses in this family cause hemorrhagic or bloody fever, typically accompanied by bleeding from body openings and/or internal organs.

How to Treat "Disease X" by Dr. Zelenko

Vitamin D3
High Intracellular Zinc Levels Need Zinc Ionophores:
Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Quercetin, EGCG

What if "Disease X" is just a distraction?

It stands to reason that at the moment the public probably doesn't find the new "deadly" variant of COVID-19 or the flu, or even the parainfluenza, particularly convincing.

Most people would also be extremely suspicious of exotic viruses like Nipah or Marburg.

The WEF meeting on January 17, 2024 could not be less subtle.

I currently see "Disease X" as a distraction and more of a preparation for the population than an "immediate threat".

Demand for mRNA vaccines is at an all time low and I don't see the public being scared by a "new pathogen" - but what if they scare them enough with something completely different and then hit them with a "new pathogen" which is most push people beyond their pain threshold?

January 10, 2024 - "All Swedes must prepare for war"
"civil emergencies", "natural disasters", "public health emergencies", terrorism, mass violence...
price gouging, or artificially inflating the price of vital supplies.
using keywords related to a sensitive event to drive traffic
claims that victims of a sensitive event are responsible for their own tragedy, victims of a sensitive event do not deserve legal redress/support.
claims that the victims of certain countries are responsible for or deserve the global public health crisis.

This definitely sounds like a black swan event.

Black Swan Event - February or March 2024?

I think we will see a "black swan event" before we see any "disease X".

What are the possibilities?

1. Ukraine war - major escalation, limited nuclear "event",

2. American terrorist attack (Iran) - dirty bomb, EMP attack.

3. Cyber ​​attack - which knocks out the electrical grid or the financial system.

4. Other types of power grid failure

5. Solar storm - which shuts down the Internet for a certain period of time.

Tucker Carlson January 13, 2024 Episode 62 with actor Dennis Quaid who briefly mentions points 2, 3, and 4.

WEF 2020 Cyber ​​Security
WEF 2020 Cyber ​​Security
WEF 2023 Cyber ​​Security

FINANCIAL SYSTEM COLLAPSES:

It's important to note that the S&P 500 took two years to form a "double top," a pattern that usually involves resistance and a downward turn.

A black swan event can cause a market to crash within weeks, as seen in the March 2020 chart when COVID-19 hit North America.

The bigger the black swan, the bigger the market crash, and once it starts, there's really no limit to how low it can go.

My opinion...

I think the "disease X" debates are now just a distraction to keep most people completely unprepared for a black swan event that could immediately trigger a catastrophic financial system collapse (stock markets, banks) "exponential way".

Now imagine the following. Let's imagine that we are in the midst of a financial system collapse following an unexpected black swan event.

The government starts distributing financial support payments to the population.

Then, amid financial disaster and chaos, "Disease X" strikes, just in time for the WHO Pandemic Agreement to come into force,

That would be more pain than most people could bear. And the population would be begging for the new "Disease X" mRNA vaccine, which could easily be made mandatory so that we could continue to receive government financial support, perhaps in the form of Universal Basic Income, with the promise that if enough people take the mandatory vaccine, then the locks are released again.

Most people are not mentally prepared for such a scenario.

CONCLUSION:

The multi-phase plan that has unfolded over the past months, with the aim of bringing the majority of the population back to the control mechanisms originally envisioned, i.e. mandatory mRNA vaccination, vaccination passport, access to financial support, employment, travel, through full compliance etc. to your opportunity.

"Disease X" itself is a diverting topic. It can be fun to guess what the new pathogen might be. The 3 most likely candidates are Nipah virus, influenza H5N1, and a mutated/recombined variant of COVID-19 JN.1, which has a high fatality rate - maybe it could get a brand new name and Greek letter.

But in reality, Disease X is a wild ride for those who are awake to be completely unprepared for events designed to cripple them along with the rest of the masses.

The Pandemic Agreement and Bill Gates' "Final Solution." The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) begins next week in Davos, where their unelected health peers will be given center stage to warn of a non-existent virus that they claim could be 20 times worse than COVID. The unelected WEF and WHO base "Disease X" on the final push for a pandemic treaty and join forces to convince world leaders to relinquish their sovereignty to prepare for a non-existent virus they claim is " can claim twenty times more deaths than the coronavirus pandemic".

Could this be the "pandemic that gets everyone's attention" that Bill Gates ominously warned of, and the time when Bill Gates' "Final Solution" is introduced?

Preparing for Disease X, again

The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Ghebreyesus, will be on stage with Shyam Bishen, member of the Executive Committee of the WEF, for a January 17 forum entitled "Preparing for Disease X".

However, we know that the NWO crew has been preparing to terrorize the masses with "Disease X" for quite some time, and Expose reported in early August 2023 that British scientists had already begun developing vaccines for a new pandemic caused by an unknown "Disease X". as "insurance" against

Disease X is a placeholder name used by the WHO to describe a disease that is still "unknown to medical science as a cause of human infection" and they were not even sure whether it would be introduced as a virus, bacteria, fungus or other pathogen . Despite this, the WHO tried to warn us of an "unknown and surprise disease outbreak" which they say "could spread around the world in 36 hours and kill up to 80 million people".


The vaccine research facility

Disease X, despite being "unknown", is reported to have been prepared by a team of more than 200 scientists at the government's high-security "state-of-the-art facility" in Porton Down, UK, and the facility has been It is run by the Health Security Agency, who have "compiled" a "dangerous list of animal viruses capable of infecting humans." (source).

According to the Independent, scientists were working to "ensure that future outbreaks are stopped and do not cause the same disruption to everyday life as 'Covid-19.'" They hoped the facility would help the UK to "X disease" by enhancing preparedness for yet-to-be-identified potential pandemic pathogens".

The mRNA Wafer

Further preparation for disease "X" has also come thanks to funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which helped the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) invest $1.2 million in Jurata Thin Film Inc. to a start-up making sublingual vaccine wafers for needle-free vaccines. CEPI's mission is to fund "the development of rapid response platforms for the development of vaccines against 'Disease X'".

We reported this in December 2023, see here - Prepping For Disease X - Gates Backed-Group Funds Needle free-mRNA Vaccine-Wafer-Technology ).


X-Clade Preparations Against Disease X

The unelected leaders of the New World Order have made even more extensive preparations, as we would expect, and again as we have reported - as they practiced for COVID-19 at the 201 event in 2019 , before the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the Clade X pandemic board exercise.

On May 15, 2018 in Washington, the US National Security Advisor (NSA) convened a group of senior advisers to discuss the mysterious illness emerging in Germany and Venezuela. Clade X was intended to "illustrate the high-level strategic decisions and policies necessary to prevent a major pandemic, or, failing that, to mitigate its consequences." And it is "used to train the highest levels of the US government, as well as members of the global policy and preparedness community and the general public."

Organizers claim that "exercises like Clade X are also particularly effective in helping policymakers gain a more complete picture of the pressing challenges they may face in a dynamic, real-world crisis."



Fresh Warnings

Now there are 'fresh warnings'," writes Mike Campbell, author of The Counter Signal, who adds, "According to the event description, 'Fresh warnings have come in from the World Health Organization that an unknown 'disease X' could claim 20 times more deaths, like the coronavirus pandemic." And it asks, "What innovative efforts are needed to prepare health systems for the multiple challenges ahead?".

Below, you can read an excerpt from the article published in the newspaper "Olenjel".

WEF and WHO threaten 'Disease X' as final push for pandemic deal.

The WEF is one of the sponsors of the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which aims to reach a "legally binding agreement" among the UN health agency's 194 member states, including Canada.

Dr. McCullough posted on X platform "Disease X" is a concept, creating a pathogen (virus, bacteria, etc.) in order to make it extremely profitable, The government buys the vaccines that are given to the whole world, over and over again, WEF and @CEPIvaccines business plan created by the Gates Foundation.

The WEF and WHO have both downplayed the concerns of citizens and politicians, who note that the Pandemic Treaty would result in countries handing over power to unelected NGOs.

The WHO says governments are leading the negotiations and are free to reject the deal.
However, the 2024 meetings in Davos will attempt to do just the opposite.

The WHO has called on member states, including Canada, to finalize an anti-pandemic convention - and throw in more money in case "the next pandemic strikes".

WHO has recently partnered with the European Union to create a globalized digital vaccine passport system for future pandemics. The development comes within a year of the White House pledging support to the WHO on behalf of all G20 countries to facilitate universal vaccine passports.

Failure to follow the rules could result in sanctions

Ghebreyesus has previously denied that the pandemic agreement would force countries to comply with its provisions, but has also threatened sanctions against countries that do not.

The WEF also stated that "it is not yet clear what will happen if the measures are not followed."
In December 2023, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico vehemently condemned the WHO, calling it a creation of Big Pharma that seeks to control governments. Source: Between WHO and WHO supported organization WHO and WHO.



Three years ago, a video was circulated in which we could hear the words of Bill Gates: "Then the final solution, which comes in a year and a year or two, is the vaccine. So we have to go full steam ahead on all three fronts".

Now we can probably assume that the preparations for Disease X have been completed for the last several years since at least 2018 and Clade X, and now Bill Gates is very excited for the final solution to happen.

Video: The Next Pandemic Gets Attention This Time, Says Billy Gates, Why Is He Smiling About This?

The 2018 Destructive Review of Human Vaccine Development, Safety, Efficacy, and Regulatory Management.
Like many of you, I have invested thousands of hours reading, writing, watching videos, giving interviews - all in order to become a vaccine expert. A recent paper caught my attention as a complete outpouring of frustration about how the vaccine industry has gotten the vaccine ideology wrong nearly 200 years from the very first attempts to vaccinate children with cowpox.

A year before the COVID-19 pandemic, K. Paul Stoller's study in Acta Scientific Pediatrics fully aired many of the concerns surrounding vaccine research, human trials, safety and efficacy reporting, and the regulatory machinery. I was surprised at how many issues Stoller attacked: The Institute of Medicine, the FDA, the CDC, the WHO, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, autism, the epidemic of peanut and other new allergies, type 1 diabetes mellitus, thimerosal, aluminum, SV40, vaccine failures and fraud everywhere in the bio-pharma complex.

K Paul Stoller. "Denial of Adverse Event Risk Following Immunization and Loss of Informed Consent - A Perspective."
Please take the time to read this paper and understand that the frustration with the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has been building since before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak arrived on our shores. The COVID-19 vaccine scandal has put many of the issues Stoller outlined in 2018 into contemporary perspective. The public works hard.

A recent study by Feldman et al., which reported on a young man who attempted suicide, caught my attention. "Our group became aware of the possibility of false positive HIV tests (everything except HIV PCR) in individuals vaccinated against Sars-CoV-2 when a laboratory technician attempted suicide. The reason: five months after the second Sars-CoV-2 vaccine after his vaccination (as he was always negative for Sars-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies), his HIV antibody tests, as well as the usual confirmatory HIV tests, were positive. Only multiple PCR checks in different competence centers showed that human HIV -virus (all HIV subtypes) was not and cannot be detected in this patient. As such cases became more common in our international network, we asked for documentation and reporting. Result: there appears to be a real effect, albeit quite small. However, with regard to HIV and the related consequences, each individual case should be examined more thoroughly."

An Australian vaccine trial was stopped in 2020 after a large number of participants tested falsely positive for HIV. "Australia has previously agreed to buy 51 million doses of a COVID-19 vaccine developed by Australian company CSL and the University of Queensland," the BBC reported.

There are now cases of false positives for HIV infection, both in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and in patients who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. Gudipati and colleagues searched 39,110 records from Henry Ford in their database and found 87 false positives for HIV, distributed among patients who had been infected with the COVID-19 virus, vaccinated, and possibly both. However, the study mostly focused on the relationship between false positives and COVID infection.

Hakobyan et al reported several cases of false-positive HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) without the actual presence of the virus being confirmed by PCR, and summarized these putative mechanisms:
"According to the literature, the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 show structural similarity to those of some viruses, thereby making antibody cross-reactivity between the two viruses feasible. HIV-1 gp41 and SARS-CoV-2 share many structural sequences and motifs, including N -terminal leucine/isoleucine repeat sequence and the C-terminal leucine/isoleucine repeat motif. In addition, the helix structure of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV gp41 is very similar, suggesting that both viruses are able to fuse their membranes by the same mechanism. SARS The spike protein present on the outer surface of -CoV-2 can cross-react with antibodies from other closely related coronaviruses. Therefore, it is possible that immunoassays can negatively influence tests, leading to false positive results. According to the literature, seasonal enteroviruses such as HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1, strongly cross-react with SARS-CoV-2".

Several questions now arise that require urgent answers:
- How common is HIV ELISA positivity after COVID-19 infection and vaccination?
- When, if at all, should the HIV screening be performed?
- How do patients deal with the possible stigma of being "HIV positive" if the test is actually false positive?
- Does HIV false positivity mean post-infection or vaccine-related immunodeficiency?

including the link between exposure to RF radiation from 5G"
Go ahead, lay hands... and info thinkers. Yes, I'll continue with the next question on my mind. I'm not an ass. I'm not an engineer or a scientist.

But there's a good news. These geniuses are pretty much all captive to the forces that want to kill you and your children and seem to be making shit up as they go along... doubling, tripling, quadrupling superantigens or virus variants or vice versa, the Non-Viral Zone or the theories of Diablo Fairy Sauce Particles.

• Here's expert #1: Steven Hatfill.
  
• Here's expert #2: Jay Bhattacharya
  
• Here's Expert #3: Two clips of lifelong bioweapons industry expert Dr. Robert Malone trying to stop the reverse transcription of mRNA warnings in 2021 and 2022.
  
• Here is expert number 4: Dr. Pierre Kory. In July 2020, Kory warned about "maskless, symptomless "superspreaders".
  
• Astrid v. Cole #3: Bigtree follows Cole to the dubious logic of Logicville
  
• In August 2022, Bret Weinstein doubled down on "intensive lockdowns" and increased testing to combat the dangerous new coronavirus. Straight out of Rockefeller's Lockstep operation.
  
• Dr. Jay Bhattacharya és Dr. Mike Yeadon nem értenek egyet abban, hogy az oltóanyagok képesek-e megmenteni az időseket.

You get the point.

So me, a soon-to- be liver-eating contrast logician , and thanks to Cheat Codes, I know what I know about Master Plans...

...when the various Chocolate Vs. I'm looking into peanut butter fake binary options...

Why not both?

Why not three things?

Why not a collection of vectors INTO YOUR BODY, THE CRITERION CREATED AS AN INHABITANT?

I can't help but think about radiation.

Because good old RADIATION reaches animals better.

as we say... the bird is covid .

On that note, let's dig deeper!

Again!

- 2018: "The rollout of 5G is absolutely insane."
- The Sabrina Files: "Everyone agrees that the heart is electric...your biofield is a body part."

Here's an article I found buried in the interwebz.

Here is the author's dissection of Dr. Beverly Rubik .

In advance, this is not TRUST THE EXPERTS.

This is an analysis of what various EXPERTS have to say, and at least a consideration of some logical explanations for your WTF hebbenden, because after four years of this shit, it's pretty clear that ZEEE has falsified the science.

FALSE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

Somewhere in this context, then, was the statement that acknowledged that certain scientific research data could be falsified - and indeed had been falsified - in order to achieve the desired results. And here it was said: "People don't ask the right questions. Some trust too much".

It was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience are all MDs and supposedly very objective, dispassionate scientists, and science is the be-all and end-all...well, falsifying scientific research data in this setting is like in the church blasphemy... we just don't do that.

Anyway, out of all this the New International Governing Body was supposed to be created, probably through the UN and with a World Court, but not necessarily through these structures. This can be done in other ways. The acceptance of the UN at the time was not as widespread as hoped. They would continue to strive for the UN to gain more and more importance. People would become more and more accustomed to the idea of ​​giving up some national sovereignty.

Here's the linked study and I'll pull out a noteworthy detail.

(And I'm also formatting it into paragraphs for better digestibility.)

I invite all STEMS to rebut any point in the document with information or factual data. In theory, this is how science should work, right?

Just like self-assembling nanoparticles, graphene or wide body space networks.

Either infectious clones, or virus-like particles, or SV40, or transmission of germs, or blood antibodies vs. mucosal antibodies vs. T-cell antibodies vs. cow dung antibodies.

COVID-19 began in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, shortly after the city-wide 5G "went live" on October 31, 2019. Outbreaks of COVID-19 soon followed in other areas where 5G was also at least partially deployed, including South Korea, northern Italy, New York, Seattle, and Southern California.

In May 2020, Mordachev [4] reported a statistically significant correlation between the intensity of radio frequency radiation and death caused by SARS-CoV-2 in 31 countries of the world. In the United States, during the first wave of the pandemic, cases and deaths attributed to COVID-19 were statistically higher in states and cities with 5G infrastructure than in states and cities that did not yet have the technology [5].

The II. Since pre-World War II, there has been a large body of peer-reviewed literature on the biological effects of WCR affecting many aspects of our health. In examining this literature, we found overlaps between the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 and the adverse biological effects of WCR exposure. Here, we present the evidence suggesting that WCR is a potential contributor to the exacerbation of COVID-19. 1.2.

Overview of COVID-19 The clinical presentation of COVID-19 has proven to be very diverse, with a wide range of symptoms and varying from case to case. According to the CDC, early symptoms of the disease may include sore throat, headache, fever, cough, and chills. At a later stage, more severe symptoms may appear, including shortness of breath, high fever and severe fatigue. The neurological consequences of the loss of taste and smell have also been described. Ing et al. [6] found that 80% of those affected had mild

This should be a completely rational and stable commentary section.

Warnings about 5G have been constant even before its widespread introduction and activation. Since 2017, doctors and scientists have called for a moratorium on Earth and in space due to biological and environmental health risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4), and the majority of scientists worldwide oppose the deployment. Of course, research has found that 5G is indeed biologically and environmentally harmful. Adding insult to injury, in 2019 telecom executives testified in the US Congress that they have NO independent scientific evidence that 5G is safe.

Resistance to 5G has limited, slowed and/or stopped deployment, but apparently not everywhere, so more people have reported symptoms and illnesses after activation. Case studies documenting this have also been published. Kudos to another Argentinian city for taking action to stop the installation.

Another Argentinian city decides to shut down 5G until security is guaranteed

Ushuaia, Argentina has joined the municipalities of Lechmann (Santa Fe), Azul (Buenos Aires) and Capilla del Monte (Córdoba) in deciding not to allow 5G installing antennas until they have accurate information that the radiation will not affect the health of the community.

Information from Ushuaia prohibits the installation of 5G antennas in the city; joins three other national municipalities (translated from Spanish).

The city of Ushuaia, located in the Tierra del Fuego, announced Ordinance No. 6317, approved by the deliberative body on December 6, which defines the city as a "radiation-free zone for fifth generation (5G) communication technology and all data transmission technologies of subsequent generations." - says the text made available by Télam.

The initiative was supported by members of the group Citizens Organized for the Regulation of Telecommunications (CORTE), which has representatives in Tierra del Fuego. The rule bans 5G "until medical, scientific and epidemiological studies are presented that demonstrate the complete harmlessness of these radiations."

The announcement also mentions that the studies to be presented in the future in order to repeal the regulation "will be carried out by the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Committee on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) and the European Parliament's Committee on the Future of Science and Technology (STOA ) must be supported by non-contradictory recommendations".

According to the measure, the municipality "will not issue any type of work, installation or similar permit for the installation of the technology" due to the "precautionary principle in the field of health and environmental protection".

The Corte association documented during the legislative debate that similar decrees have been approved in many self-governing states around the world, and that Argentina has similar decrees "Lechmann (Santa Fe), Gualeguaychú (Entre Ríos), Azul (Buenos Aires) and Capilla del Monte (Córdoba) in the municipality." In the case of Gualeguaychú, the rule was changed a week ago and the municipality will be able to install 5G antennas.

"It's not that we want to ban development. There are many people who don't understand that this technology has not been tested and that it has already caused problems in some places," said Corte member Alejandra Guerrero in Tierra del Fuego. The leader announced that a similar project "under analysis" has been presented to the deliberative council of the city of Río Grande in the northern part of the province.

Gregory Billings claims he was misinformed that he would be entitled to severance pay and a pension if he resigned. A former Fredericton firefighter who quit because of the city's COVID-19 vaccination policy for employees is suing his former employer, alleging he was misinformed that he would still be eligible for severance and pension benefits even if fired.
Gregory Billings is now seeking $280,000 in severance pay and damages for pension and lost income until his expected retirement at age 65.

Billings also claims that the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 1053, his former union, did not adequately represent him by failing to mourn his "unjustly forced" termination.

"The plaintiff relied on misrepresentations by the City of Fredericton that he was offered retirement and as a result suffered damages in terms of his severance pay and loss of a portion of his pension," according to the claim, filed in Fredericton Crown Court by Jonathan Martin, a lawyer representing Billings. .

None of the allegations in the lawsuit, filed Dec. 14, have been examined in court, and neither the city nor the union have filed a statement of defense.

CBC News requested an interview from the City of Fredericton and the firefighters union.

City spokeswoman Elizabeth Fraser said in an email that the city is not commenting because the case is before the courts.

CBC News did not receive a response from the union.

Suspension Precedes Resignation

Billings says he had been with the Fredericton Fire Department for 21 years and was serving as a captain in the fire prevention division when he resigned on or about Dec. 15, 2021.

With overtime, he earned about $140,000 a year.

According to the lawsuit, problems between Billings and his employer began on Sept. 3, 2021, when he was sent home without pay in response to his refusal to follow masking and testing protocols for unvaccinated staff.

On or about October 15, 2021, the agency notified Billings that if he continued to be noncompliant, steps would be taken to replace him permanently, and that the union had approved his dismissal.

The next day, the fire department advertised Billings' job as a vacancy to be filled, according to the lawsuit.

NB COVID-19 overview: Fredericton announces vaccination policy for employees.
New Brunswick ends mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for most government employees.

The following week, Billings returned to work and followed masking and testing protocols, but was "immediately" suspended for one day without pay for allegedly consistently failing to follow protocols and for speaking to the media, according to the suit.

On or around October 29, 2021, the agency implemented a new COVID policy that states that if staff are not fully vaccinated by December 17, they will be suspended without pay or fired.

According to the lawsuit, since his job was already advertised, Billings expected to be fired if he did not get vaccinated against COVID-19 and continued to explore his options, particularly whether resigning was better than being fired.

The suit further alleges that around October and November 2021, city human resources employees "fraudulently or negligently misrepresented" Billings that he would not be eligible for severance pay if fired.

As an alternative, he was told that if he quit, he would receive his retirement severance pay and pension supplement, the lawsuit states.


According to the lawsuit, Billings relied on "misrepresentations" from city employees when he resigned from his position on Dec. 15, 2021, and plans to continue collecting his severance pay and deferred pension.

"The plaintiff was subsequently informed in January 2022 that he was not entitled to the severance pay and the deferred pension," the lawsuit states, adding that because of this, he later used his only option to take the converted value of the pension.

Breach of contract also alleged

The suit also alleges that the contract between the city and Billings was an "inducement" for him to opt for early retirement instead of termination, and that he only agreed to resign because of the promise of access to retirement.

"The City of Fredericton breached the contract by denying the plaintiff the retirement and pension promised in their agreement, and the plaintiff was harmed in the amount of his lost pension and severance pay as provided in the collective bargaining agreement," the suit states.

The lawsuit also alleges that after Billings learned that he was wrongfully fired, he asked the union to challenge his wrongful termination, but they decided against him.

Had the union challenged the termination, the likely result would have been reinstatement, with or without pay, until the fire department abandoned the fire policy "several months later," according to the suit.

As a result of the allegations, Billings is seeking compensation for pension and lost income until the age of 65, compensation for salary in lieu of notice, compensation for the loss of his pension to be proven at a court hearing, pre-charged interest on said amounts, and costs to be determined by the court.

The symptoms of the disease called "polio" still exist today under various other names, the only difference being the presumed cause. However, it is clear that an "infectious" cause has never been proven, and there is no scientific evidence to support the mainstream narrative that Polio is contagious. According to medical biologist Simon Lee, the idea that polio is highly contagious is a myth used to support the toxic vaccine campaign and cover up the crimes of agrochemical poisoning.

What is polio and has it really been eradicated?
Simon Lee, Research Associate, Anew UK

"Historical mortality trends for polio are not representative of historical mortality trends for infectious diseases. When other diseases were at their most severe in the 19th century, polio was still relatively unknown in many areas. As in the 20th in the first half of the 20th century, mortality from other diseases fell, polio mortality rose. Polio mortality showed a trend opposite to that of most other diseases, and in general to that of infectious diseases." Jordan Henderson

The Terror Campaign

In the middle of the 20th century, polio was a terror that not only sickened people (especially the young), but also sometimes crippled them. Images of people in iron lungs and children wearing leg braces played a prominent role in the terror campaign against polio.

With the main causes of death and disability (TB, cholera, diphtheria and malaria) reduced or at historic lows by the 1940s, this generation was arguably the healthiest population in history, but polio was still persistently an "inexplicable horror".

Terrorist propaganda organizations such as the CDC, the WHO, the European CDC, and others claim that polio is caused by a "virus" that is "highly contagious" or "highly contagious" and that "90 to 100 % can infect".

We are encouraged to be especially afraid of children because, according to the WHO, "as long as a single child remains infected, children in every country are at risk of polio."

We should not only fear children and people with cold or flu symptoms, we should also avoid those who have no symptoms at all, because "an infected person can spread the virus to others right before symptoms appear and up to 2 weeks after symptoms appear" According to the CDC.

The CDC informs us that the vast majority of Polio cases are asymptomatic. It is claimed that large numbers of people are potentially unknowingly infecting others:

"It is estimated that 95-99 percent of people infected with poliovirus are asymptomatic. This is called subclinical polio. People infected with poliovirus can spread the virus and infect others even without symptoms."


Dubious Diagnoses and Relabeling of Symptoms

In reality, polio is just a collection of common symptoms given a scary label. Symptoms include sore throat, fever, fatigue, nausea, headache and abdominal pain. These symptoms are the same as the flu and virtually any other illness, except that there is a small chance of paralysis. If flu-like symptoms develop into paralysis, the disease is considered polio.

Oddly, it is claimed that the most accurate way to diagnose polio is through a stool sample, not blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Surely this "virus" must be present in the cerebrospinal fluid of people suffering from this paralytic disease of the central nervous system.

In 1954, the criteria for the diagnosis of polio were changed to make it a much rarer diagnosis. Prior to 1954, paralytic symptoms lasting only 24 hours were sufficient to establish a diagnosis of polio without residual paralysis or laboratory confirmation. After 1954, residual paralysis was diagnosed 10-20 days and then 50-70 days after the onset of the disease. This change in definition meant that, from 1955, paralytic poliomyelitis was defined as paralysis of longer duration, and as a result, most cases of polio miraculously disappeared.

In addition to raising the standard to secure a polio diagnosis, conditions with the exact same symptoms were simply given a new name, such as acute flaccid myelitis. According to the Mayo Clinic,

"Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare but serious condition that affects the spinal cord. It can cause sudden weakness in the arms or legs, loss of muscle tone, and loss of reflexes. The condition mainly affects young children. Most children have have a mild respiratory illness or fever caused by a viral infection about one to four weeks before the symptoms of acute flaccid myelitis develop".

Acute flaccid paralysis is another term used to describe the disease formerly known as Polio:

"AFM is actually a newly coined term for a subset of cases of the long-known acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) syndrome in which spinal cord-related myelitis is documented, typically by magnetic resonance imaging with imaging (MRI) visualization. The term AFP includes other causes of flaccid paralysis, such as trauma, tumors, and immunopathological disorders." Source:

The disease formerly known as polio has been reclassified as both aseptic meningitis and Guillain-Barre syndrome to magically disappear.

Today, polio can only be considered if all other possible causes of acute flaccid paralysis have been ruled out.

Polio has not been defeated, the symptoms of the disease have only been reclassified under new names, and the criteria for diagnosis have changed to make it a much rarer diagnosis.

The disease formerly known as Polio still exists today, although it is not as widespread as it once was.


Polio is NOT contagious

"Even five years ago, it would have been considered a joke if someone claimed that the disease in question was contagious or contagious, if anyone claimed that the disease in question was contagious or contagious." L. Emmett Holt

Polio is caused by a "highly contagious virus" that spreads easily from person to person through feces and droplets from coughs and sneezes.

Is this really true?

Swedish pediatrician Dr. Karl-Oskar Medin, who conducted the first scientific studies of a polio epidemic in 1887, concluded that polio was an "infectious" disease, but not "contagious."

In 1899, a Norwegian researcher named Leegaard was unable to prove patient-to-patient transmission during 54 Norwegian polio outbreaks:

"The only remarkable observation in this regard was Leegaard's. He proved that the disease showed a remarkable connection with the country roads. But even for him, the exact way of spreading the disease remained unclear. He expressed his current view in the following sentence: "Polio is contagious, but not contagious. In fact, not a single indisputable case of contagiousness has been proven."

An 1893 article, "Is Acute Poliomyelitis Unusually Prevalent This Season?", appeared in an issue of the widely read Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. with title. Contrary to expectations of a "contagious and contagious" disease, most of the polio victims came from the suburban and rural areas around Boston, not from the city itself:

"It is remarkable, against any strongly marked epidemic effect, that the patients were by no means from a single locality , but came from various parts of Boston's large suburban area."

Dr. Charles Caverly, in his book "Infantile Paralysis in Vermont," claimed that no "infectious" disease had been found to account for the 1894 outbreak of polio, and he was certain that it was not contagious:

"In this epidemic there is generally no there was an infectious disease as an etiological factor. Nor did the infectious element enter into the etiology. I found not a single case in which the disease occurred in more than one member of a family, and as it generally occurred in families with more than one child, and as no effort was made to isolate, I'm pretty sure it wasn't contagious."

In the 1909 issue of The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Dr. Herbert Emerson confirmed Dr. Caverly's views in his account of the 1908 polio epidemic in Massachusetts. He found that in those cases where there was no separation between families with many children, and in many cases there was a close relationship between family and friends (there were at least 244 closely related children in total), only 2 cases developed. He concluded that the disease was at best "mildly contagious".

Dr. Fredrik Batten published his paper "Epidemiology of Polio" in 1911, describing the non-contagious nature of polio during a 1909 epidemic. He mentioned that there was no "infection" in the hospital. No attempt was made to isolate or disinfect, and at least 70 children came into contact with sick children, but no "contagion." This led to the conclusion that the paralytic stage of the disease was not contagious, as there was a complete absence of "contagion" even when the contact was intimate.

New York doctors, Luther Emmet Holt and Frederic Bartlett, in their work entitled "The Epidemiology of Acute Poliomyelitis" published in the American Journal of Medical Sciences in 1908, reviewed all polio cases reported in the medical literature at that time. , a total of 35. Particular attention was paid to reports of multiple diseases occurring in the same family. Out of the 1,400 polio cases they reviewed, only 40 cases found more than one patient in a family. They concluded that the contagiousness of polio was an open question, and if it was contagious, it was only to a very small degree.

Dr. Lloyd Aycock, of the Department of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene at Harvard Medical School, spoke about the epidemiology and spread of polio in his lecture at the 1926 conference of the American Medical Association. He found that the incidence of polio is higher in rural areas than in cities, which is contrary to what we would expect from an infectious disease.
Dr. Aycock also emphasized that there is no evidence of direct transmission between polio patients.

In 1938, GO Barber stated that polio was certainly not highly "contagious" because children in overcrowded homes who slept in the same bed as the paralyzed child every night did not "become infected".

In 1951, Dr. Aycock also pointed out that epidemiological evidence for direct contact was lacking, estimated at around 5%, indicating that the rate of direct contact cases was negligible.


Examining a 1935 polio outbreak in Louisville, LL Lumsden found that there was no evidence of transmission by personal contact:

"Throughout the investigations painstaking efforts were made to obtain every trace of the transmission of the disease by personal contact, but evidence of a personal connection between polio cases in this Louisville outbreak appears to have been no more frequent than would have been found if there had been stories of a personal connection between broken bones occurring in the city during the same period. "

In 1938, Lumsden expressed further doubts about the contagion hypothesis, stating that the evidence points to the opposite conclusion:

"The general and usual epidemiologic features of the disease all seem against the hypothesis that polio is an infectious disease, spread by nose-to-nose or other direct it is spread between people by personal contact. What is the reason for such a regional distribution of the disease we call polio? We simply do not know. None of the usual hypotheses of transmission—contagion or otherwise—appears to apply to it to any satisfactory degree."

In his 1938 study "Acute Anterior Poliomyelitis", GO Barber found that polio did not spread in children who often slept with paralyzed siblings for days at a time, and went so far as to claim that polio was certainly not strongly " infectious."

In fact, Dr. Archibald Hoyne, professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago Medical School and attending physician at two Chicago hospitals, noted that in the 35 years he worked in the "infectious" wards of Chicago hospitals, not a single physician, intern, nurse, staff member, or hospital patient " infected" with polio.

Dr. Hoyne reflected on the good of polio research, since
"very little information of practical value has been added to our knowledge of polio in the last forty years" and lamented that "the more we know about polio, the less we know."

Dr. Hoyne listed a summary of the problems associated with polio despite extensive research into the problem:

"SUMMARY OF THE PROBLEMS

Agent of still unknown etiology.
Spread by warm weather, unusual for an infectious disease.
Mode of transmission undetermined.
Susceptibility of the exceptionally well-nourished.
Symptoms lack
of a practical laboratory diagnostic test.
Diagnostic difficulties caused by the "new virus".
Reliable preventive measures.
Reliable treatment methods.
The question is whether the isolation of polio patients is an effective means of controlling the disease."

Edward Shaw and Hulda Thelander from the Children's Hospital of San Francisco were also dismayed about the situation:

"All aspects of polio have been subjected to intensive study in the last two or three decades, this despite this, the clinicians did not receive any inescapably solid principles about the epidemiology and spread of the disease, its exact pathogenesis, or the details of the diagnosis and treatment... The epidemiology of the disease is still shrouded in obscurity. There was a tendency to move away from the early theory that the disease was spread by direct contact".

In 1951, Dr. Ralph R. Scobey, professor of clinical pediatrics and president of the Syracuse Poliomyelitis Research Institute, challenged the concept of polio infection. Dr. Scobey pointed out, that all attempts to prove contagion have failed, and that knowledge of polio is based almost exclusively on animal experiments rather than clinical trials.

In 1952, Dr. Scobey stated that conclusive evidence of infectiousness had not been established in any polio epidemic, so in 1949 , nor during the largest polio epidemic in recorded history. He noted that it proved impossible to demonstrate the contagiousness of polio not only in humans but also in animals.

Dr. Scobey expressed further doubts in his 1952 publication "The Toxic Cause of Polio and Obstacles to its Investigation " in his article:

"In addition to the failure to prove the infectiousness of poliomyelitis in humans, it was also impossible to prove the infectiousness of poliomyelitis in experimental animals".

These early studies of polio did nothing to prove that polio was a contagious viral disease. Its characterization as a "contagious" disease was not based on solid evidence.

The nurses and mothers who cared for the affected children never fell ill, and there was no evidence that polio cases occurred in hospital wards where children with the disease were admitted.

Photographs taken of medical and nursing staff during this period show that they did not wear gloves or masks, and thus apparently had no fear of contracting polio from the patients they cared for.

Much of the evidence for polio in humans came from cruel animal experiments that did not apply to humans.

Monkey Business

"In addition to the failure to demonstrate the infectiousness of human poliomyelitis,



In 1948, Dr. Ralph Scobey, Van Rooyen and Rhodes stated that our knowledge of polio was derived from experiments on monkeys and not based on the facts observed in humans.

In 1918, Milton Rosenau, professor of preventive medicine and hygiene at Harvard, stated that the only way to create experimental polio was to paralyze monkeys in the laboratory by injections directly into the brain or spinal cord. But even after paralysis, the monkeys did not become infected, and monkeys do not spontaneously contract polio, even when kept in close contact with each other.

In a 1941 study, Dr. John Toomey noted that the experimental mode of transmission in animals did not apply to humans, and that monkeys did not infect other monkeys, no matter how closely related they were.

In 1908-1909, German researchers Landsteiner and Popper claimed to have isolated the polio "virus" and used it to cause polio in monkeys. Powdered soup made from diseased brain tissue was injected into the brains of two monkeys. One died and the other got sick.

"It must be admitted that our present views of the pathogenesis of human polio derive largely from recent experimental work in monkeys rather than from facts observed in patients." Dr. Ralph Scobey

Pesticide Poisoning

In the mid-1950s, Dr. Morton S. Biskind testified before the US Congress and told politicians what they didn't want to hear. He told them that polio was not caused by a virus but by central nervous system (CNS) poisons, and the main CNS poison at the time was a pesticide called dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT).

DDT was used during World War II against insects believed to have caused malaria and typhus among soldiers and civilians. The inventor of DDT, Paul Herman Müller, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1948 "for the discovery of DDT as a highly effective contact poison against several apes."

By October 1945, DDT was available to the general public in the United States and was heavily promoted as an agricultural and household insecticide.

Photographs from the era show housewives misting their houses with DDT, dairy farmers dusting cows in the cowshed and even sprinkling it into the milk, crop dusters spraying fields and forests with DDT, and children on beaches who they were covered with the pesticide. With a lawnmower attachment, DDT could be sprayed onto lawns, and trucks would spray DDT onto city streets where children played.

DDT replaced lead arsenate, which was introduced in 1898, and before that simple arsenic was used as a pesticide. These are all known human central nervous system toxins.

Experts who have studied the pharmacology of DDT and determined that it is dangerous to all forms of life have cautioned against its general public use as an insecticide. By 1945, it was already known that DDT was stored in the body fat of mammals and appeared in milk. This did nothing to stop the intense campaign of mass poisoning that followed.

Government officials relied solely on the authority of government authority and the sheer number of experts to support their position that DDT was safe. No evidence was provided to counter the evidence that clearly demonstrated that DDT was unsafe.

It has been shown that young children exposed to DDT developed lameness lasting from 2-3 days to a week or more. DDT has been shown to cause degeneration of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord in experimental animals.

The neurotoxic effects of DDT are well known and include the usual polio/influenza symptoms: dizziness, headache, fatigue and vomiting, as well as paralysis and death:

"The neurotoxic effects of DDT include tremors, convulsions, paralysis, central nervous system lipid-, a decrease in its phospholipid and cholesterol content. Early-life DDT exposure causes reduced growth, mortality, reduced levels of brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, increased spontaneous motor activity in adulthood, and reduced learning ability".

https://www.ewg.org/sites/humantoxome/chemicals/chemical.php?chemid=20007

There was a clear, direct, one-to-one connection between pesticides and polio for thirty years, pesticides prevented the occurrence of polio.

As the use of DDT declined in the US, so did the incidence of polio. Vaccines were introduced at the same time and were credited with reducing the number of polio cases.

Polio Vaccine Madness

Both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines are known to cause the exact same disease they are designed to prevent. Polio cases were reclassified when vaccines were introduced to make it appear that polio had been defeated.

Most people think that polio has been eradicated, but it is still present in India, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Most of these cases are caused by the vaccine, which in principle protects against the disease.

"It's actually crazy because now most of the world we're vaccinating against the vaccine, not against wild polio, which is limited to Pakistan and Afghanistan."

Dr. Vincent Racaniello (virologist)

It is a common view that polio has been completely eradicated thanks to vaccines. In reality, polio was on the decline even before the introduction of toxic vaccines.

Even with worldwide vaccination programs, polio has not disappeared. The same symptoms have been given a new name, most notably acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), and many parents have observed this condition occurring after vaccination.

In India and Africa, the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis has skyrocketed, which many attribute to campaigns for experimental polio vaccines given to young children.

In a 2018 publication in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Indian researchers described a strong link between polio vaccines and AFP. It was calculated that between 2000 and 2017 there were "an additional 491,000 crippled children" in India over "expected numbers".

According to Dr. Suzanne Humphries, "there is strong evidence that the experimental polio vaccine is likely to be associated with a spike in AFP."

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of the disease once labeled polio still exist today under various other names. The only difference between these labels is the assumed cause. However, it is quite clear that an "infectious" cause has never been proven, and the ability to transmit the disease from person to person is not supported by the evidence.

The mainstream narrative about polio has been challenged with overwhelming evidence by many doctors, scientists and researchers who have shown that there is no evidence to support the contagious nature of polio.

It used to be widely accepted that polio was not a disease that could spread from person to person, or even from animal to animal under experimental conditions.

During the animal experiments, toxic, unclean soups were injected into the animals' brains, which - not surprisingly - sometimes resulted in paralysis. However, this paralysis was not transmitted through contact with other animals. This is not surprising considering the fact that the polio "virus" has never been properly purified and isolated and proven to be the causative agent through natural exposure consistent with the scientific method.

DDT and lead arsenate, which were used when polio was widespread, cause exactly the same symptoms attributed to polio.

The history of polio is a fictional tale used to promote the toxic vaccine campaign and to cover up the crimes of poisoning by the agrochemical industry. The idea that polio is "highly infectious and contagious"

The CDC's unscientific advice on polio: "To generally prevent infection, patients should stay home when they are sick, wash their hands frequently with soap and water, avoid close contact (such as touching and shaking hands) with those who are sick, and clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces."

It sounds familiarly?

Internal medicine has abandoned the use of rapid antigen tests for COVID 19. A leaked internal memo dated Jan. 8, titled "Important Laboratory Update," said the use of the tests "must be discontinued immediately" at all of Interior Health's affiliated sites.
Existing tests should be discarded.

According to the memo, rapid antigen tests "are not reliable for diagnosing COVID 19."

The BC Center for Disease Control said the CDC will withdraw oversight of the tests effective Nov. 21, the memo continues.

"As such, COVID 19 RAT tests can no longer be used to guide clinical care or infection prevention measures and should be discontinued immediately in Interior Health emergency departments, hospitals, long-term care facilities, or ambulatory care settings."

According to the note, symptomatic patients should use nasopharyngeal swabs, which will be tested by the IH microbiology laboratories.

However, IH says it wants to "clarify" the content of the memo since it started circulating on social media.

"Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs) detect infection in more than 70-80 percent of patients with COVID-19 and are a great tool within the community to inform members of the public that they may be infected with the COVID-19 virus and thereby helping to prevent the virus from spreading to others," Amanda Wilmer, medical director of microbiology and genomics, said in a statement to Castanet.

"However, the RAT cannot test for other common respiratory viruses, such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, which are also circulating, so regardless of the RAT results, it is important that they use respiratory hygiene measures and stay at home until they feel well enough to participate in normal daily activities.

"Critical treatment and infection control decisions in health care settings are made based on the results, and because the more accurate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which can detect both influenza and RSV, is readily available, RAT is not is the preferred test".

Wilmer said the RAT "still has a role" in diagnosing COVID in the general population and is "a valuable tool if it's positive - but it doesn't rule out respiratory viral disease if it's negative, especially since it doesn't test for anything else respiratory viruses such as influenza or RSV.

"That's why the PCR test is needed in more important health care."

"Going forward, RAT will no longer be used for clinical decision-making in our healthcare facilities, a change supported across the province to ensure that all clinical care and infection prevention and control decisions are based on the most accurate information for patients in order to maintain its safety."

Wilmer said during respiratory virus season, it's still important for the public to "protect themselves and those around them by getting vaccinated against influenza and COVID-19 if eligible, staying home until symptoms of respiratory infections appear, and seeking medical care for severe symptoms." please".

As protesters across Germany remain calm, Chancellor Scholz resorts to amnesia and vilification. Two small insights into the current situation in Germany. First, Hubert Aiwanger, a member of the non-partisan Freie Wähler (literally Free Voters, sort of like "independents" in the US) faction, posted the following last night:


There is also a short video in the post and I encourage you to click on this link (same as above) and watch it as well.
My opinion: these are the German patriots who, despite all the blunders of the recent past, live by their natural and constitutional rights, freedom of speech and assembly, and demand redress of grievances.

Beautiful, huh?

Berlin Blob condemns protesters

Meanwhile, Philippe Debionne from Nordkurier - one of the few brave papers that actually does journalism (in the autumn Mr Debionne was condemned by politicians for reporting on the AfD's Covid investigation in the Brandenburg state parliament) - wrote a long response to the Berlin Blob, which I'm linking to, but due to its length, I'll post a "proper" quote below (machine translation with my corrections; emphases mine):

Chancellor Olaf Scholz, nonsense and call to violence

Chancellor, in your speech [which Mr. Debionne also linked] shortly before the largest demonstration against the federal German government in recent decades, he turned to the Germans. Among other things, he said in his speech: "Political opponents are not 'complete idiots' [orig. Vollpfosten] and 'calls to violence and personal threats have no place in our democracy.'" Why is he saying this now? Now that the majority of Germans Is it against the #Ampelregierung [current federal government]? And a large number of these people are taking to the streets (regardless of whether they are farmers or not)? Why didn't you say anything 'then'? When

Saskia Esken @EskenSaskia, the @spd @spdbt @ spdd party leader tweeted: "Thousands of covid idiots celebrate in Berlin as 'second wave' without social distancing, without masks".

As Green Bundestag Saskia Weishaupt @SaskiaLeaRaquel wrote: "Tactics of the Querdenker [i.e. left-right deplorables] , that he fights himself off little by little on the street. The police need to act and when in doubt use pepper spray and rubber batons! You mustn't give them an inch!

As Bianca Blomenkamp, ​​the group leader of the Greens Hamburg-Harburg @Die_Gruenen, wrote on Instagram: "Today is the day I want to hit everyone who voluntarily remains unvaccinated without further ado."

As Björn Casapietra @BCasapietra tweeted: 'Anyone who still doesn't get vaccinated against COVID-19 today should be taken away in handcuffs to get a forced vaccination'.

As Jan Böhmermann @janboehm [state television late-night comedian] explained on Youtube: 'It's the fault of the bastards who still can't vaccinate themselves'.

As Marie von den Benken @Regendelfin wrote: "I wish: there are no unvaccinated idiots where there are others".

What did he say when these and thousands of similar statements where mental and physical violence against unvaccinated people and people critical of the Covid mandate were tolerated and even demanded? What did Mr. Scholz say when insults - and "complete idiots" [orig. Vollpfosten] far (!) worse insults - were uttered with understanding, or even taken as political correctness, then he said:
"For my government, there are no longer any red lines in what needs to be done. There is nothing to rule out.

And now, directly in the face of the biggest anti-federal government protests in decades, you stand up and warn of "extremists and some freeloaders" who are "calling for rebellion and talking about overthrowing the system"?

@Bundeskanzler, the protests are not against the state. No they are directed against the democratic system, and they are not directed against the Federal Republic of Germany. They are directed against your government. Against the #Ampelcoalition.

People are not shouting "Germany is dying" like the autonomous Antifa mob, or "One people, one empire, one Führer", like the far-right. People who are now taking to the streets are shouting loudly: "#Ampel must go!".

Don't forget to check out Mr. Debionne's post to see Olaf Scholz's speech (that is, if you can to watch with a stomach).

If you'd only watched the Berlin Blob speak, you'd probably agree with Mr. Scholz, eternal sunshine in the style of an immaculate mind (I'm looking at you here, legacy media, consultants, entrepreneurs, and especially you spineless MPs).

If you put it in the context of Mr. Aiwanger's post (who by the way also suffered the whiplash of "anti-Semitism" in the fall, see below), you might think that Mr. Debionne's assessment is more correct than the Berlin Blob.

As a side note, Mr. Aiwanger was harshly criticized by the Munich and Berlin Blobs (he is Bavarian, so the Munich Blob got involved in this case as well) for allegedly handing out anti-Semitic leaflets as a teenager (!). This happened before October 7th, but it still caused quite a storm, based on the (sketchy) recollection of one of Mr. Aiwanger's high school teachers. A few days later it turned out that it was not Mr. Aiwanger who distributed the said leaflet, which is very embarrassing, one would think, right? As far as I know, Mr. Aiwanger has not even sued the man who tried to publicly destroy him. But I digress.

What, you might ask, was Mr. Aiwanger's "crime"? By the way, he called out the Blobs in Berlin and Munich for refusing to come to terms (Aufarbeitung) with their disastrous Covid policy.

And in this respect both Mr. Aiwanger's and Mr. Debionne's comments are well,

Remember: the night is darkest before dawn.

Former Interior Minister Mariusz Kaminski and former Deputy Interior Minister Maciej Wasik, both members of the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, were arrested in the Polish presidential palace on Tuesday evening. Politicians were previously sentenced to prison terms, but received presidential pardons. In response to the arrests, crowds of protesters immediately took to the streets, and PiS representatives filed a complaint, accusing Sejm Speaker Szymon Holownia of crimes, Origó summarized.

This is not a Polish government - PiS president Jaroslaw Kaczynski hinted that the new government led by Tusk obeys the interests of Brussels.

The participants in the demonstrations sharply criticized the illegalities of the ruling coalition and demonstrated in defense of democracy, as the new government removes those who are not willing to follow the new direction in the media and in the courts in order to seek a political showdown and trample on constitutional rules.

This is not only about political freedoms, but about the complete destruction of democracy - emphasized Mateusz Morawiecki, the former prime minister.

The Brussels-controlled Tusk government has already ruthlessly followed the lead of George Soros and the Brussels elite, but the main cause of the protests began with attacks on the public media, where government-appointed leaders began to promote LGBTQ propaganda.

Soros' methods have been exposed - President Andrzej Duda emphasized the political changes, refusing to sign the new decision on the financing of public media during the demonstrations.

The events began about ten months before Mateusz Morawiecki, the former prime minister, announced his candidacy for the presidency of the PiS party. According to Morawiecki, the decision will be made by the party's political committee, and he emphasized that he hopes current party leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski does not plan to retire.

In the midst of political storms in Poland, the head of state initiated a pardon process in the case of Kaminski and Wasik, who were previously sentenced to three years for abuse of official power. The state of emergency and political showdowns suggest that Polish politics is facing an unstable period.