Amazing luxury cars arrived in the country in 2023, statistics revealed that not one Ferrari with a list price of more than HUF 100 million was put on the market here, including Zoltán Jákob's luxury SUV, for which he could pay HUF 200 million. The favorite sports car of Hungarians last year was the Porsche 911, and among luxury limousines, the Mercedes S-Class came out on top.

In 2023, although the Skoda Octavia led the total number of new cars put on the market for almost the whole year, in the last months the Suzuki S-Cross caught up so much that it finally became Hungary's favorite car last year, with a total of 5,936 of them put on the market here, the Octavia With 5,608 pieces, it took second place on the top list. The third most popular model was the Suzuki Vitara in 2023, with 4,979 sales.

This is the high average, but what about the more affluent group of buyers in Hungary? In the latest statistics, the Pénzcentrum looked at which luxury cars arrived in the country in 2023.

According to Datahouse's summary, Hungary's favorite sports car is the Porsche 911, which is available at a base price of 122,000 euros, roughly HUF 40 million, and of course it can be upgraded to more than double that price. Of these, 103 units were sold last year, followed by the Ford Mustang with 84 units, the lowest list price of which is HUF 22.5 million in Hungary. Third is the eight-cylinder BMW with 51 sales, which costs at least HUF 38.6 million. Apart from these, the farewell Audi TT (33 units) was also popular among sports cars, and the Mercedes AMG GT also made it into the top 5 (32 units), with a base price of HUF 81 million.

Among the more exotic pieces, 7 Ferrari 296 GTBs arrived for at least 125-130 million and three of the same in the GTS version (this is also the least 130 million category), six F8 Spiders were renewed for at least 90 million, 5 812 GTS (approx. 130- HUF 150 million at the basic price), and two approx. 90 million Ferrari Roma also received a Hungarian license plate in the sports car category, as well as a base price of approx. Also F8 Tributo costing 80 million. 3 more SF90s worth at least 150-160 million have arrived, if you ask, as well as 4 Portofinos, this "only" starts at roughly 70 million.

A Lamborghini Huracan also has a Hungarian license plate, which can be worth at least 80 million forints, as well as an Aston Martin DB12 starting at a similar price, 3 more Vantages from the English brand, worth at least 50 million forints, and two DB 11s (approx. 65 million forints). In addition to the Porsche 911s, two 718 Spyders were also imported (base price approx. HUF 60 million), and six Lotus Emiras were delivered last year - this base price is approx. 40 million forints. In addition to the AMG GT, the AMG version of the Mercedes SL also sold well in the category, 25 of which were sold with domestic license plates, with a base price of 54 million. Among the more interesting pieces is the Morgan Plus Six (base price approx. HUF 45 million), one of which someone brought into the country, and two, each approx. A Maserati MC20 costing HUF 100 million has also arrived. (...)

Instead of real estate tax, green tax and compulsory energy renovation are the methods of expropriation. For more than ten years, the sale and purchase of real estate has been tied to an energy assessment. The next step is the mandatory renovation of improperly classified properties, and in case of failure to do so, their sale will be prohibited. The ban causes a real estate crisis, which also reduces the possibility of obtaining an apartment, pushing the direction towards renting.

The government will soon impose a green tax on all buildings that do not meet the classification repair requirements!

The green frenzy measures CO2 emissions, which means they will ban wood and coal burning by imposing a punitive tax on it. Gas boilers and convector heating will have the same fate. Emission tax and increased gas prices. There will be little electric heating, the building only complies with the rules if the insulation is also adequate. In the case of a wooden-floored village house, this means a 60 cm attic and 12-15 cm wall insulation, in addition to replacing all windows and doors!

The regulation applies to all buildings, business premises, warehouses, plants, residential buildings, animal buildings - without exception! The mandatory renovation frenzy can get so bad that the government revokes the owner's residence or occupancy permit by decree, or gives a grace period, after which it imposes a high penalty. Any case can immediately mean the loss of livelihood or property! In the case of non-payment of the penalty, the property may be charged as a mortgage that earns interest, and if it reaches a certain percentage of the property's value, it may lead to an auction. It is also conceivable that with a decree, the collection will be issued as a "state claim" to a "state claims manager", which will pass it on to debt collection companies, and anyone who earns a minimum wage, is retired, or is a small entrepreneur can already be the fate of foreign currency creditors.

For now, the government has only made climate protection rules mandatory for new constructions and expansions, but this raises prices so much that the average Hungarian will not be able to buy a new apartment or build any small processing plant. The existing small and medium-sized enterprises can only solve the energy renovation by taking out loans, which reduces their subsistence income. The remaining income may decrease so much that it will not be worth continuing the business, which will take away the livelihood of families. SMEs have so far employed more people than multi-companies, but this will now change. This is how the activities end up in the hands of global companies, which is called the "development of supply chains". (...)

David Webb, a former hedge fund investor, wrote a book called "The Big Take" and made a documentary of the same name. In his book and film, he details how the Federal Reserve influences financial markets and how money creation has outpaced US economic growth, a clear sign that the velocity of money is collapsing.

Central bankers and other globalists carefully planned the coordinated collapse of the financial system using sophisticated strategies, including the manipulation of derivatives markets. Whatever securities we think we own are not really theirs, and if the derivatives markets crash, they can take it all away from us.

While Webb's work is of serious concern, there are other, more pressing issues that require attention. The number one priority is to ensure that we can keep our financial transactions under control. We must help lawmakers protect the freedom of financial transactions.

North Dakota has a sovereign state bank, and the Florida state legislature is preparing to introduce legislation to create a state bank in the state of Florida. All states must do this because it is one of the most important ways to protect the financial freedom of all citizens.

Priority number 2 is building and ensuring food freedom, and number 3 is transparency and education. We need to enlighten people about the seriousness of the situation so that they can start making different decisions en masse.

In the video above , financial expert Catherine Austin Fitts, founder and president of the Solari Report, is a recurring guest. He is one of the smartest people when it comes to understanding finance and how to protect our wealth against global wealth reallocation.

We also discuss the work of David Webb, a former hedge fund investor and good friend of Austin Fitts. He has written a book called "The Great Taking" available as a PDF for free at thegreattaking.com and a documentary of the same title available on CHD.TV, Rumble and YouTube.

Webb's book and film detail how the Federal Reserve influences financial markets and how money creation has outpaced US economic growth, a clear sign that the decline in the velocity of money (the speed at which money circulates in the economy) is coming to an end. In short, a great financial depression is coming, and when everything collapses, we will lose everything.

A Financial Coup in the Making

Webb reveals that central bankers and other globalists have been carefully planning the coordinated collapse of the financial system for at least five decades, using sophisticated strategies, including the manipulation of derivatives markets.

Whatever securities we think we own are not really theirs, and when the derivatives markets crash, they can take it all away from us. In the end, you really "will have nothing", as predicted/promised by the World Economic Forum (WEF).

But that's not all. In Austin Fitts' annual roundup of what he calls "many grand thefts," Webb describes just one of them. Wealth is stolen from us in a dozen other ways, all of which we must understand if we are to be even remotely successful in protecting ourselves.

"I'm a lot about cures, not problems," says Austin Fitts, "and when it comes to cures, we have to make sure that we're lining up the cures against different tactics of the enemy. So sequencing is very, very important when it comes to cures. It's about.

The most important thing about the big takeover is that the World Economic Forum has said what it plans to do: it's 2030 and you have no assets. So the question is how exactly are they going to take your assets?

David talks about losing your securities, but there's a lot more to worry about than your securities. You've got to worry about your bank, which you go into and it describes the history of banks very well. You've got to worry about your real estate. You've got to really worry about precious metals and other currency alternatives.

You've got to worry about your business and your local investments, and yes, you have to worry about your securities as well. David's only focus is on securities, so we've created this 'Big Income' section where we go through everything."

The Top Three Priorities

While Webb's work is of serious concern, there are other, more pressing issues that require attention. According to Austin Fitts, the number one priority is ensuring control over our financial transactions. Therefore, by 2024, it aims to help US state legislators work with banks and citizens in their jurisdictions to protect the freedom of financial transactions.

"This is where containment is critical," he says. "If they take control of our financial transactions, they can take everything, and I mean everything, including our children..."

If you look at the conditions that some of these payment gateways require, we give them permission to access our bank accounts and take everything away. This is scary.

So the number one solution is to check our financial transactions. If you visit Solari, you will find a note about the freedom of financial transactions. Print it out and see what you can do to protect yourself from someone checking your financial transactions.

If they get that, the big takeover is already underway. They take everything - property, securities, everything. So, first of all, don't worry about your securities. Worry about your banking and transactions.

The second big takeover is food and health. There is a lot of pressure to control the food system, because in order to control financial transactions, they also have to control food, because if you can get food and energy outside the banking system, you can survive without their banking system. Therefore, we cannot have a 100% digital financial system.

The third big move that worries me is real estate, because we're seeing extraordinary moves to take control of land, real estate, including farmland, which is very closely related to food.

There are all kinds of games that can be played with the banking system to keep people from defaulting on their mortgages, and of course interest rates and inflation are part of that."

As Austin Fitts noted, the process of reducing the homeownership rate has been going on for decades. It has to do with monetary policy, because inflation has doubled the average payment on the average priced American home in just the last four or five years. So the younger generation is getting completely drained and can't afford the house anymore.

It's also related to another big scam, which is student loan fraud. The most major banks pay almost zero percent on capital, compared to 5-9 percent for student loans and 17 percent for those with credit card debt. ``It's a tremendous difference in the cost of capital that's literally built into the system in a very unfair way,'' he says.

A system that robbing us of our safety devices

Austin Fitts goes into Webb's background and explains how he came to his discoveries. In summary, financial regulators have created a way for us, as senior lenders, to be stripped of 100% of our security through the escrow system, possibly through default on a derivative.

But Austin Fitts isn't too worried about that, because although Webb says the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) has created a legal avenue, Austin Fitts and his experts say it won't last. "We're still looking for the UCC expert to figure it out," he says.

However, Webb demonstrated that financial regulators went to extraordinary lengths to enforce control over ALL collateral. According to Austin Fitts, this was done to maintain the financial bubble.

"I'm not worried about a securities takeover in the near future, because I think assets can only be taken if the banking system is brought under control over financial transactions," he says. "If we have that, we can do anything. You can expropriate 100% of the wealth, including securities. So I think control over financial transactions will come faster. As for the

order, I think access to all securities will not take long itself. David would say that if they're going to corner them, they should. In my opinion, they have so many ways to get out of the corner that it's not necessary. They're going to do what I've seen them do, which is to monitor financial transactions to force.

But that's the great thing about David's research. Nobody cares what they did if there is integrity in the system. I think David has proven once again that the financial system lacks integrity and is designed to favor the few over the many Another thing I really liked about his book is

that he describes the game in the banking system during the Great Depression from the perspective of insiders and outsiders - how your bank can fail; you lose your deposits but are still responsible for your mortgage.

And of course that's how they get access to people's real estate. You forgive their income obligations, but you hold them accountable for their debts."

No safe harbor for anyone

It's telling that Webb embarked on this journey to find out how to protect his own family's wealth, only to find that there is no safe harbor , not even for a financial insider like him. The system is rigged in every way. The common sense is that there is no escape from this big takeover. We have

to face it and do the work necessary to change the system so that it works for everyone protect it. Part of that job is to make our politicians aware of what's going on and that it's in their best interest to protect financial freedom.

Many of them are extremely wealthy and stand to lose everything if they don't act. They're not isolated from this big from a takeover. As Webb noted, there is no safe harbor for them either. Webb believes the situation is salvageable, but some sort of reboot is needed.

Just not for the great reset that the globalists are planning. One option would be to introduce a small tax on digital transactions, say a fraction of 1 percent. The revenue from this transaction tax could be used to fund the government and abolish the income tax, provided we don't have to engage in international wars.

The three biggest financial losses

According to Austin Fitts, the three most important things that eat up our wealth are:
- Tyranny
- The use of environmentally damaging practices such as industrial agriculture instead of regenerative agriculture, the hardware required for the control network and the radiation of the electromagnetic field associated with it.
- Control of innovation, which prevents cost savings.

All three points can be changed. We can eliminate these financial burdens, but we don't have to start there. First of all, we must ensure our freedom of financial transactions, because basically everything depends on it. If we lose that, we've already lost everything else.

Three Essential Action Points

Again, Solari's note on financial transaction freedom is worth downloading. Describes problems and solutions in detail. "Do what you enjoy," says Austin Fitts.

"One of those is using cash. And if you're using cash, talk to local businesses and find ways to interact locally to increase local resilience. And of course food is the most important thing because I don't know of any other way to get safe food , like knowing where it comes from and knowing the people who produce it...

The third thing we can do is provide transparency, and that's very important. On Solari, we've put together a list of short videos about CBDCs and about the freedom of financial transactions. The first is a one-minute video in which the head of the BIS essentially says that with CBDCs we can centralize and enforce the rules. In

the second video, Neel Kashkari, head of the Minneapolis Fed, one of the 12 Fed banks, says: " I can understand why the Chinese want this because it gives them complete oversight and control. But why would the Americans allow this? If it's so bad that one Fed chair says they don't want it, that's very helpful.

Then Bo Li [the] Deputy Director General of the IMF talks about the programmability of money, meaning if they decide you can only eat bugs and no longer pizza, then you will only be able to buy bugs with your money. And Richard Werner talks about being told by a senior central banker that CBDCs will eventually be the chips they want to put in your hands.

We need to explain to people what is going on and help them understand how serious the situation is, because it is hard for many to imagine that anyone would want such total control. With the help of artificial intelligence and software, we can provide this kind of complete control.

With a very short video of no more than one minute, people will understand. And that's the point where you can go to the state legislature and the state banking association and say, "Okay, what are you going to do to make sure I don't end up like the truckers in Tennessee?".

What is very interesting... states have the power to exercise full sovereignty over money and money movements within their territory and to protect it. But they didn't do that. And one of the reasons is that the Treasury and the central banks have done a very good job of making it financially attractive to enter the federal system.

At some point, sovereignty and freedom will be more important than spending another $2 billion on education - an education that requires us to teach our children how to be sex slaves.

One action you can take to create transparency is to work with your bankers, state bankers associations, and state legislators to push them to action. And if you look at the Financial Freedom Memorandum, you'll find a list of different things a federal legislature can do."

Why We Need Sovereign State Banks

North Dakota already has a sovereign state bank, and the Florida state legislature is preparing to introduce the state bank bill in Florida. Tennessee is exploring the possibility of creating independent payment systems and is in the process of creating a bullion depository and authorizing its treasurer to buy gold and silver.

These are just a few of the strategies that can and will be implemented in every state. As Austin Fitts put it, "I can only protect my individual sovereignty if my state protects my financial sovereignty. And states can do this by creating sovereign state banks that are not tied to the central banking system.

" Having a sovereign state bank means that your citizens pay taxes into your accounts, and you are able to work with state banks, credit unions, and financial institutions to maintain transactions so that the Treasury or Federal Reserve cannot block or shut them down.

I mean, it's amazing. If you also have a gold bullion custodian, you have gold and silver reserves and it makes it easier for other people in the state to have a custodian that they can trust, and that means they can start trading gold and silver, especially if sales tax is abolished.

Tennessee eliminated sales tax on gold and silver. And now there's a big fight going on - several states have introduced bills to make gold and silver legal tender, but without the feds being able to collect capital gains, so they can use gold and silver as local currency. It's a great way to introduce a local currency."

Rebooting to Build Wealth

In summary, the first thing we need to do is regain and secure control over our financial transactions. Next, we need what Austin Fitts calls a "Building Wealth Reset," a reset of the financial system, which allows us to build both life capital (health) and financial capital.

And we can. Although it may seem like we're on an express train headed for a brick wall with no way to get off, it might just be an illusion. It probably is. we have a lot more options than we think.

"During the [trial against the government], I was surrounded by a lot of different lawyers who said, 'You have to do this, you have no choice,'" says Austin Fitts.

"And I said, 'I refuse. I'm not going to do this. It's a choice. And then what would have happened? Suddenly there was an opportunity that didn't exist before. In other words, refusing to take a path that I couldn't choose , created a new option."

Remember this as you move forward. It may seem impossible to refuse to be part of the system, but choosing to refuse may be the very thing that opens up entirely new possibilities and options. Of course, there are ways to win, starting with government leaders committing to a sovereign state banking system.

On January 9, 2024, Gabriel Attal, often seen as a protégé of President Emmanuel Macron, made history at the age of 34 as the youngest Prime Minister of France under the Fifth Republic. On January 9, 2024, Gabriel Attal, often seen as a protégé of President Emmanuel Macron, took a historic step at the age of 34 as the youngest Prime Minister of France under the Fifth Republic. Attal has earned the nickname "Baby Macron" because of his young age and his shared centrist political ideology with Macron. That's not all Macron has in common, as both are alumni of Klaus Schwabs Global Young Leaders program.

Attal was an early supporter of Macron's En Marche movement in 2016, following his exit from the Socialist Party, and already has an impressive political portfolio for someone so young and in just a few years. He was a member of parliament in 2017 and a government spokesman in 2020.

Most recently, in August 2023, he was the Minister of Education, where he allegedly "gained popularity with his 'skillful handling of the Covid epidemic and his firm defense of secularism and authority in schools'".

Not elected, but appointed by Macron

Attal was not elected, as seems to be the norm these days, but was selected by Macron and appointed to replace his predecessor, Élisabeth Borne, after she resigned following recent political turmoil over an immigration law that according to critics, he made too many concessions to the far-right - reports France24,

Attal came to the top position because Macron wanted to present a change of government just in time before the Paris Olympic Games and the summer European Parliament elections, where Macron's centrist forces risk defeat led by Marine Le Pen against the far-right."

Diversity and inclusion

France 24 wrote that "Attal is the first openly gay man to hold the office of prime minister, a major milestone in French politics. In his private life, he maintains a life-long relationship with his partner, Stéphane Séjourné, who is an active member of the European Parliament of Macron's Renaissance party." (Who cares?)

"In addition to his political achievements, Attal is also recognized for his communication skills and media presence. He has a strong following on social media platforms and often uses these platforms to connect with the public through video content and messages. He appears regularly on various television and radio programs and is known for his calm and persuasive demeanor, but at the same time he can be violently belligerent when faced with far-right opposition." Source:

The chronicle highlights Attal's personal experiences, including being bullied at school for his sexual orientation and losing his father to cancer at age 18, which he spoke openly about, writing that "Gabriel Attal's roots lie in the rich fabric of multiculturalism back".

As a result of her multicultural heritage (her father, David Attal, a Jewish dentist, immigrated to France from Morocco in the 1960s. Her mother, Valérie Benaim, a celebrated journalist and television presenter, is from Tunisia and Algeria, and the fact that she has two older sisters, according to the publication "proof of diversity and inclusion"

Cher Gabriel, Le Mini Macron is also a WEF graduate.


(Is it just me or does Damian Thorne make you think of him?)
So his background, according to JC, "shapes his image of France as a nation of diversity and inclusion. Source: B. Blah, blah, blah, blah, yes, it's all relevant He ticks the "vigilant" box.

But what was arguably more important in terms of his suitability for the role was not revealed by France 24.

According to the World Economic Forum (WEF) website, Attal is a "renowned and former member of the WEF's policy training program, Young Global Leaders member."

So Attal, like its president, is a "Young Global Leader." The Spectator writes: "Young Global Leaders, as its website boasts, is 'aligned with the mission of the World Economic Forum', which aims to 'accelerate responsible the impact of a diverse community of leaders that crosses borders and sectors in order to create a more inclusive and sustainable future".

"The initiative was created by Klaus Schwab in the 1990s and alumni include Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, former Prime Ministers of New Zealand and Finland Jacinda Ardern and Sanna Marin, and former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz. Media alums include the founder of Meta , Mark Zuckerberg and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales."

The Spectator noted that Schwab is proud of his initiative and showed it in a 2017 Harvard interview where he explained how we "infiltrate" the cabinets of prime ministers and presidents who are also Young Global Leaders.

Schwab was particularly pleased with his work in Canada, where he says half of Justin Trudeau's cabinet are "young global leaders from the World Economic Forum."


"What we're really proud of right now [is] getting into the cabinets. [More than half of Canada's cabinet ministers] are actually World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders... That's true in Argentina, and now it's true in France, where the president [ also] Young Global Leader".

However, this may be an exaggeration: according to the Spectator, "there were five of them, and although Schwab claimed to have trained Trudeau himself, it is unclear whether he was really a 'Young Leader'." However, Trudeau's biography on the WEF website praises his "respect for and promotion of freedom and diversity and a more democratic form of government that truly represents Canadians."

Schwab also named France as a Young Global Leader in Emmanuel Macron. He went through the program in 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. "Like Ardern, Varadkar and Trudeau, he is also a committed globalist and progressive who is unable to govern in any other way. He is just a piece of the old block.

Maybe Klaus Schwab would be proud of them, but they do not inspire much love among their own people," he writes. the Spectator."

Attal The Bildergerger

Not only Schwab prepared him for office, Attal is also reportedly a "key man" of the Bilderberg group.

The Jewish Chronicle, which bills itself as the world's oldest Jewish newspaper, wrote: "Attal, also openly gay, is currently Minister of Education. He was born to a Tunisian Jewish father and Orthodox Christian mother and attended a prestigious Paris law school and Le Science Po University studied."

Attal, according to the Chronicle, was one of the first to support Macron when he decided to run for president, then he was elected as a representative, and at the age of 29 he became the youngest minister of the V Republic and conservative Philippe de Villiers, former minister and representative X/published on Twitter in his post: "The nomination of Gabriel Attal to replace Pap Ndiaye is the disaster of the summer. We are moving from being awake to being LGBT".

However, the news outlet quietly slipped in that "Attal is an activist and a key member of the Bilderberg Group" and supports re-education." As if they had just said that she was a member of the Women's Rights Institute!

Private Bilderberg meetings


Bilderberg is a paramasonic and globalist club whose existence has long been denied by the media and accused of conspiracy by those who denounce the secret meetings. Source

Le Media explains that "the Bilderberg Group, also known as the Bilderberg Conference or the Bilderberg Club, is an annual informal gathering of about one hundred and thirty people, mostly Americans and Europeans, who are mainly involved in diplomacy, business, politics and the media consists of personalities.

The paramasonic and globalist Bilderberg club held its meetings in Lisbon from May 18 to 21, 2023. Among the 129 participants, ten French representatives attended this private annual meeting, and one of them happened to be Gabriel Attal.

These ten French representative participated in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, the banking system, China, the energy transition, Europe, fiscal challenges, India, industrial and trade policy, NATO, Russia, transnational threats, Ukraine and American hegemony .

According to David Icke, the Bilderberg Group is a global elite capable of steering human society towards a global tyranny that would have horrified George Orwell"

Video here
with or without French Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, but it appears that the One World Government appointed representatives to positions of power.

That is why we can no longer say that we live in a democracy in the West. Our weak lily-livered government ministers allowed this coup d'état, and the Schwab-educated global leaders really "infiltrated" our governments, and on purpose.

Attal took his place in the One World Government, as Sun, Macron, Arden and Trudeau did before him, and they all have their roles, but they work as they are told.

As David Icke said about the Bilderberg group, the WEF government "will push human society in a direction of global tyranny that would have made George Orwell cringe."

You remember when we showed that the "stealth" secret sauce behind Bidenomics was nothing more than a massive multi-trillion dollar debt-fueled spending spree that led to the largest non-crisis budget deficit in US history, a total deficit in FY 2023 and ended with just over $2 trillion, double the previous year, in what BofA's Michael Hartnett called the "era of fiscal excess"?

Well, we have news: if 2023 was bad, then 2024 - of course an election year - promises to be much worse.

The US Treasury Department reported the budget deficit for December a few minutes ago, and it should surprise no one that the US continues to spend like a drunken sailor, or rather more. As shown in the chart below, in December the US collected $429 billion through various taxes, while total spending was $559 billion... ...
which resulted in a deficit of $129.4 billion in December.

This may not sound like much, but December is actually one of those months when the US deficit is, or has been, relatively tame.

As you can see in the following chart, the December deficit traditionally hovered between just under $10-20 billion... until 2020, when it exploded to an all-time high of $140 billion. And while it fell sharply in 2021, it jumped dramatically in 2022 and just hit the December crisis peak last month!

Here's some more context: December tax revenue of $429.3 billion was 5.6% below December 2022 revenue of $454.9 billion and 11.8% below December 2021 revenue. On an LTM basis, total US tax revenue was $4.521 billion, a 7.2% decrease compared to the previous year. This is the 9th consecutive annual decline in LTM tax revenues, which historically only occurred when the US was in recession. As a side note, the "smart economists" were confident that the tax revenue collapse would reverse after November when the deferred California taxes were collected. Well, November has come and gone and the big picture is just as ugly.

If we look at spending, unlike tax revenue, there is a risk of falling... ever; and indeed, the US spent a total of $559 billion in December, up 3.5% from $540 billion a year ago and up from $508 billion in 2021. Looking at the 6-month moving average, we are quickly approaching the exponential stage, even if we factor in the release explosion in 2020 and 2021.

Put it all together and you get the scariest graph yet: the YTD budget deficit for the three months of fiscal year 2024 is already $509 billion, which would be the largest single-quarter deficit in U.S. history, barring the covid leap year of 2021, when the U.S. injected trillions of dollars into the stimulus.

As for the last and most shocking figure, December's budget deficit of $129.4 billion is more than $40 billion higher than the median estimate of $87.5 billion, and more than 50% higher than the December estimate of $85 billion for fiscal year 2022. compared to its absence.

Needless to say, this is completely unsustainable and will ensure the US fiscal collapse, not if, but if. But we already knew this, thanks to the CBO, who was kind enough to map out the endgame:

The funniest part is that the US is on an ever-accelerating path to bankruptcy, less than a year after the crook in the White House announced it this ridiculous propaganda.

We can't wait to see what actually happens to the budget deficit over the next 10 years. Warning: there will be no happy ending.

Lately, Netflix's recently released movie "Leave The World Behind", which is based on the novel of the same name, has been making a lot of noise. The plot revolves around a catastrophic meltdown in the United States triggered by a cyber attack (and a massive drone strike) that cripples the internet and shuts down the global economy, raising the question of who might be behind the sabotage.

The most interesting aspect of the film is not so much the story (which is weak at best) but the fact that Barack Obama was heavily involved in the making of the film as an executive producer and script consultant. Because of this, many suspect that the film is actually predictive programming - propaganda designed to acclimate the masses to the idea of ​​an event planned for the near future.

Similar concerns were raised in 2021, when the World Economic Forum organized a "war game" called Cyberpolygon, which was designed to simulate a massive cyber attack on vulnerable functions of the World Wide Web. The reason why Cyberpolygon attracted so many eyebrows is completely understandable: at the end of 2019, WEF organized another simulation called Event 201. The game, which featured CEOs of some of the world's most influential healthcare and media companies, as well as a number of government officials, "accidentally" focused on the outbreak of a global coronavirus pandemic and took place just months before the actual event.

In other words, as if the globalists at the WEF knew that Covid was going to strike.

Video here

Although the impact of cyberattacks is often exaggerated in Hollywood, such a disaster is a very real and significant threat. So-called technology "experts" often ignore the larger threats to the Internet because they have been indoctrinated to believe that the World Wide Web has too much redundancy. In other words, they pretend the internet is invincible.

But this is actually not the case. Even if data loss can be prevented with cloud storage, the Internet as a mechanism can still be shut down or turned off intentionally for long periods of time.

In the past I wrote about a very interesting event that was barely reported by the media: the "Fastly Outage". In June 2021, there was an internet outage that brought much of the internet to a complete shutdown, including many mainstream news sites, Amazon, eBay, Twitch, and Reddit. Many government websites were also unavailable. All this happened when an "error" occurred at the company that operates the content delivery network (CDN) Fastly. Although Amazon restored its website within 20 minutes, the brief outage cost the company more than $5.5 million in revenue.

A content delivery network is a geographically distributed network of proxy servers and their data centers. They form the so-called "backbone" of the Internet.

Fastly recognized and fixed the problem within two hours, and continues to maintain that the outage had nothing to do with a cyberattack. However, one of the biggest vulnerabilities of the Internet (the structural fulcrum that Carl von Clausewitz called the "center of gravity") has become known to the public. A significant portion of the internet depends on just a handful of CDN companies, including Fastly.

By colluding with these companies, governments can deploy an "internet kill switch" against potential civil unrest. A cyberattack would simply eliminate the government as an arbiter (or serve as a false-flag scapegoat for the government to deflect responsibility). But what would actually happen if the Internet went down for a week, a month, or a year? In the United States, the consequence would be a disaster, because our economy is too dependent on digitization.

About 10% of US GDP is directly related to online commerce. It doesn't seem like much, but a loss of this GDP would push the US into an immediate and steep recession. About 17 million jobs are created by Internet commerce businesses in the United States, and about 38% of these workers are employed by small businesses. According to surveys, 70% of American workers say that they could not do their work effectively without Internet access.

If the trend of working from home had continued even during the Covid shutdowns, an even larger part of the economy would depend on the health of the Internet.

The five industries considered most vulnerable to cyber attacks are public administration, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, finance and insurance, education and retail. So these are the industries that are most often attacked. Attacks on vital utilities are usually popular sites of disasters depicted in literature and movies, but in reality they are much less worrisome. The real danger is the possibility of an attack on the Internet as a system. It would only take a few CDNs or multiple CDNs to be attacked simultaneously to cause widespread online disruption.

Most importantly, however, is how international banking and finance uses online networks to maintain the flow of money. Without the Internet, the speed of commerce drops immediately, and it can take years for the system to recover before it collapses.

But who would benefit from such an attack? To be sure, foreign powers could seriously damage the country by crippling the American digital infrastructure without directly and militarily fighting it. However, globalists also have several advantages.

During the Cold War, one of the biggest obstacles for the elites in their attempt to implement medical tyranny and the "Great Reset" was to spread facts that debunked the pandemic narrative. American conservatives were a major obstacle to their success because millions of gun-toting patriots refused to obey. The harder they pushed, the greater the chance of an armed uprising.

Although the powers that be had every single major tech company on their side when it came to mass censorship of opposing information, they couldn't stop the truth from spreading - Covid was nowhere near the threat it was made out to be, and the alternative media was quick to wake the public up. The elite did not have as much control over the internet as they thought.

In the event of a large-scale cyber attack, the Internet could be completely shut down, leaving only the corporate media to filter information and control coverage. The alternative media would be silenced and the public would be left confused and desperate for answers. Interestingly, this is one of the central themes of Obama's "Leave the World Behind" program - the idea of ​​a population completely cut off from reliable information, desperately trying to figure out who is attacking them.

The Internet has become such an integral part of the Western economy that most people would not know how to live without it if it disappeared. This is the unsettling reality we face in the midst of more and more geopolitical conflicts and increasingly repressive governments. It seems only a matter of time before a major disruption occurs.

The solution is obvious: localization of trade and production is the way to prevent the collapse of the entire spectrum, and alternative communication networks, such as amateur radio networks, can prevent the suppression of information. There is no reason to make Americans vulnerable to the vagaries of globalization, interdependent supply chains, or digitalization; they can and should create their own emergency plan. Where we struggle is to get people to recognize this and implement basic local measures. Unfortunately, many first world citizens assume that the system will always be there when they need it, and only actively seek solutions when disaster is on their doorstep.

Opinion polls in Taiwan show growing support for independence as Chinese leader Xi reiterates the need to "reunify" the island with the mainland. When the votes are counted in the presidential election in Taiwan, not only the island's 23.6 million inhabitants will be anxiously awaiting the results - there will also be worried faces in Beijing and Washington.

The January 13, 2024 election is seen as a litmus test for the future of Taiwan-Strait relations. It takes place at a time when the status quo regarding Taiwan - an area characterized by Beijing as an integral part of "one China" - is being questioned.

If Taiwan's pro-independence party remains in power, Chinese leader Xi Jinping may feel he has no choice but to force reunification.

If, on the other hand, the opposition wins and agrees with Beijing that Taiwan and the mainland are part of "one China," but not on the question of who governs the country, then Beijing may feel that it can be more patient on this issue.

Ahead of the election, Beijing has stepped up military exercises in and around the Taiwan Strait, apparently as a warning to Taiwanese voters. One of the most recent incidents was when China sent a series of balloons over the island on January 6, which the Taiwanese government saw as a threat to aviation and an attempt at intimidation.

In his annual New Year's speech, Xi declared that "China will definitely reunify," which raised international fears that he would seek to enforce the issue militarily if necessary.

The outcome of the vote will also affect Washington. The United States maintains close ties with Taiwan's current leadership. However, recent tensions in the strait have increased the risk of war.

U.S. moves seen as provocative by Beijing, such as then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan in 2022, have prompted China to step up its military threats in the strait. This has led to speculation that China is running out of patience and that the timetable for reunification is getting shorter.


A PLA soldier exercises amid tensions with Taiwan. Source: CTV
In the meantime, the question arose as to whether the United States could respond to Chinese aggression against Taiwan; in a third region of the world - after Ukraine and Israel - the specter of war worries national security leaders in Washington.

Independence on the ballot?

The presidential election in Taiwan turned into a race between three candidates. In the lead is the current vice president, William Lai, the candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party. The DPP regards Taiwan as a sovereign country and does not seek reunification with China.

Lai's challengers are Hou Yu-ih, mayor of New Taipei City, who is running for the Kuomintang (KMT), and Ko Wen-je, a former mayor of Taipei, who is running for the center-left Taiwan People's Party (TPP). The KMT supports the idea of ​​future unification with China under a democratic government.

The TPP criticizes the DPP's and KMT's agenda for Taiwan-China relations as too extreme and seeks a middle ground aimed at maintaining the status quo: A Taiwan that is de facto sovereign but maintains strong economic and cultural ties with China.

Taiwanese law stipulates that polls cannot be published in the 10 days before an election. On January 3, when the last polls were published, Lai was leading with an average of 36%, Hou with 31% and Ko with 24%.

Lai continues to lead in the polls, prompting the KMT and TPP to consider a joint nomination. However, the two parties could not agree, and the coalition attempt failed.

This could have proved crucial, as the alliance would have been the best chance of electing the KMT's candidate - which would have cooled tensions with Beijing.

Taiwan Democracy

The island of Taiwan has been governed under the name "Republic of China" since 1949, when the KMT lost the civil war against the Chinese Communist Party. The CCP established the People's Republic of China on the mainland, and the KMT retreated to Taiwan.

For decades, the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China disagreed on every possible policy except one: both governments agreed that there was only one China and that Taiwan was part of China. Both governments wanted to unite Taiwan and the mainland - but under their own rule.


Kuomintang supporters at an election rally in Taichung, Taiwan on January 8, 2024. image: Man Hei Leung / Anadolu via Getty Images / The Conversation
Although this is still the goal in Beijing today, Taiwan's outlook has begun to change.

The change began with the democratization of Taiwan, a process that began in the early 1990s after decades of autocratic rule. The island held its first democratic presidential election in 1996 after the gradual introduction of direct election of the legislature, governors and mayors.

Although Beijing held military exercises in the Taiwan Strait to disrupt the election, the KMT-affiliated incumbent prevailed against a DPP candidate with close ties to the Taiwan independence movement.

Four years later, the DPP candidate won and began his first two consecutive terms in office. In 2008, the KMT candidate returned to power. However, since 2016, Taiwan has been led by DPP's Tsai Ing-wen.

Tensions between the two countries tend to rise when the DPP is in office and subside somewhat when the KMT is in power. This is not because the KMT agrees with Beijing on the status of Taiwan - the party has always made it clear that unification is only possible under its own government and never under the leadership of the Beijing Communist Party. But the KMT reiterates the idea that eventual unification with China is the goal for Taiwan.

In 1992, representatives of the KMT and the CCP met in Hong Kong and agreed on the "1992 Consensus." Despite the name, the two sides do not fully agree on what it means. The KMT affirmed the idea of ​​a unified China, but noted that there was no consensus on what the government of this China should be; the PRC interpreted the consensus as being in favor of a CCP-controlled China.

Nevertheless, the 1992 consensus became the basis for a series of measures that strengthened the Slavic-Crusader relations and made it easier for the People's Republic of China to tolerate KMT-led governments.

Pro-independence sentiment

Although global coverage of the election has been dominated by speculation about the election's geopolitical implications and China's response to the election, independence is one of several critical issues affecting the island for Taiwanese voters.

Many voters are concerned about rapidly rising property prices, stagnant wages, slow economic growth and the incumbent party's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Regarding the issue of independence itself, Taiwanese opinion polls show a creeping trend of support for independence. In September 2023, nearly half of Taiwanese voters (48.9%) supported independence for the island, while 26.9% were in favor of maintaining the status quo. A shrinking minority - now only 11.8% - said they hoped for reunification in the future.

If the DPP remains in power, Beijing may feel pressure to push the issue of reunification.


The DPP's Lai Ching-te is leading according to the polls ahead of the January 13, 2024 presidential election in Taiwan. Image: CNN screengrab
Xi called on China's military to be able to successfully occupy Taiwan by 2027, although forcible reunification could be achieved through a combination of economic blockade and military pressure.

If this were to happen, the US's commitments to Taiwan - along with the US's credibility with its Asian allies - could be in jeopardy. President Joe Biden has repeatedly stated that he is ready to defend the island militarily against an attack from mainland China.

As early as 2024, the USA will face two major conflicts that require its attention. How Taiwanese voters vote - and how policymakers in Beijing respond - could determine whether a third war is more or less likely.

The year 2024 ties several important elections around the world into a knot - the sudden untangling of this knot could trigger a world war. One thread of this knot leads to the southern part of North America: Mexico. Who will Trump find there if he wins?

Elemi Chinsky: Some have already wondered who the "ponytail woman" could be on the cover of the British (or European) edition of The Economist in mid-November 2023. The question could even sound like this: Who is the woman who, according to the Economist, will soon rule Mexico?

It is now clear that the former mayor of Mexico City, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. The Economist provided the crucial visual clue almost simultaneously in a separate article.

If Sheinbaum wins the June 2024 election, she will not only become the first woman in Mexico's history to hold the office of president, but also the first Jewish woman to head the Mexican government.

A brief overview for context

Whether or not, from the perspective of posterity, World War III has already begun, there is constant speculation as to which further escalation would provide the unmistakable signal of the beginning of World War III in our present. By now, everyone knows that the entry into an armed conflict of one of the two largest hegemons on Earth - the People's Republic of China or the United States of America - would be considered such an indicator. This is especially true - but not only - if a close ally of the other hegemon were to be attacked or occupied.

For Beijing, Taiwan, which is currently allied with the USA, is a fragile powder keg. For Washington, Israel is clearly the sore point, where the comfort of a proxy war - such as the war against Russia in Ukraine - would quickly run out, and direct engagement and spending on its own ground would be threatened. Once an Islamic or Arab state actor—such as Russia's partners like Iran or Syria, the Yemeni Houthis in the Red Sea, or NATO member Turkey—was actively involved in a major Middle East war by Israel, these conditions for entry would be more than met by the U.S. for.

However, the USA has another vulnerable, not so small, point that it tries to keep in a completely different area of ​​domestic political debate - as if it has nothing to do with everything else going on in the world: Mexico. The country shares more than 73 percent of its border with the USA. Donald Trump was elected president in 2016 in part because he promised to close the US-Mexico border to illegal migration, human trafficking and, above all, drug trafficking. He also built his infamous "wall" during his tenure, but all these efforts were quickly nullified by Democratic President Joe Biden in early 2021. The border has been de facto open again for years - according to estimates, up to 300,000 illegal immigrants could cross into the United States from Mexican territory in 2023 alone. We will examine this aspect last, as this is where the critical point is hidden.

The Economist distributes breadcrumbs as an analytical feast

The Economist's US publication "The World Ahead 2024" shows the globe, half of which is shaded by the striking silhouette of former US President Donald J. Trump. The darkened half includes the continents of Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia - the rest are bathed in sunlight. As mentioned at the beginning, the cover of the identical, but British-European edition is somewhat more complex and clever. The graphic shows a number of dualistically juxtaposed elements - in colors and symbols: on the one hand, Putin (blue) versus Selensky (red) - both face each other in hostility; on the other, facing away from each other, Xi (red) and Biden (blue).

Claudia Sheinbaum's silhouette - like the profile of the "ponytail woman" - is smaller and is located directly above Zelensky's profile. Opposite Sheinbaum, Trump's silhouette can be seen over Putin's effigy - with a question mark that was omitted in Sheinbaum's case. The Economist therefore identifies this year's Mexican and American presidential elections as undoubtedly the most important regular political events.


Partial view of "The Economist" front pageScreenshot "The Economist"
We have already mentioned above that Sheinbaum will be the first Jewish person to hold the office of president in Mexico - the same applies to Zelensky, who has been in office since 2019, and Ukraine. In addition to this similarity, the geostrategic situation of the two countries is also similar. Just as Ukraine occupies an intimate geopolitical position that threatens Russia's security policy, the same applies to the US with neighboring Mexico. However, unlike Moscow, Washington DC has not yet faced a "sudden escalation." The Economist's collage does not refer to a US-Mexico conflict either.

Mexico's domestic political kitchen

The former mayor of Mexico City, Sheinbaum, was nominated by his party coalition for the presidential election in September 2023 - a few months before he resigned from the position of mayor of the capital.

Sheinbaum's rival is businesswoman Xóchitl Gálvez - a former senator of the center-right National Action Party (PAN) until 2021 - who has since joined the social democratic Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD). The PRD and the PAN form a grand political coalition called "Strength and heart for Mexico", which nominated Gálvez as a candidate against Sheinbaum. Either way, it is statistically certain that Mexico will have its first female president this year.

Sheinbaum's party, on the other hand, is also the party of the incumbent Mexican president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador: Movimiento Regeneración Nacional (MORENA). Like the rival PRD, MORENA can be considered "social democratic", but due to its strong left-wing nationalist tendencies, many observers also consider it "anti-neoliberal" - which can hardly be blamed on, for example, the German SPD.

When Obrador won the 2018 elections with MORENA, founded seven years earlier, the almost hundred years of dominance between Mexico's two other old popular parties ended. Obrador's tenure was characterized by defiance of the US's strategically important northern neighbor - while insisting on national self-determination. This is especially important when we consider that this contrast has not really weakened during Biden's "progressive-moderate" tenure.

Sheinbaum is seen as a disciple of Obrador, who, according to the Mexican constitution, can only hold office for a maximum of six years anyway. Like Obrador's political career, Sheinbaum's also led through the Mexican capital: both were its mayors. Obrador governed from 2000 to 2005, Sheinbaum from 2018 to 2023, and the latest polls put Sheinbaum at 60 percent.

The Mexican elephant on the border

It might as well be called, "The Republican Party's Elephant on the Mexican Border." Because over the past year, the rhetoric of U.S. politicians belonging to the Republican Party has been, to some, shockingly aggressive toward Mexico - to the point of calling for an invasion or "military operation" against the southern neighbor. This more offensive security policy stance was also largely voiced without Trump's direction or instructions. However, there is a justification that makes all this plausible: the Mexican drug cartels, which form a criminal "state within a state".

Obrador's defiance of Washington (both under Trump and Biden) is best seen in his apparent unwillingness and inability to help the United States fight and contain its own fentanyl drug epidemic. The number of fentanyl overdose deaths in the United States has increased dramatically in recent years, with more than 70,600 deaths in 2021 alone. Fentanyl is a highly addictive synthetic opioid that is 50 to 100 times more potent than heroin or morphine. However, its production costs are dramatically lower than most other drugs. The vast majority of illegal fentanyl currently flows from Mexico through drug trafficking routes to the US and Canada, the largest sales markets for Mexican cartels. They are talking about an annual trade volume of at least 13, but very often 50, and according to some American politicians, it is estimated at up to 500 billion dollars.

In recent years, Beijing and Washington, DC have left little room for cooperation. One in which Beijing was lenient and understanding was the international regulation of the ingredients of classic fentanyl and its new hybrid versions. China is the largest supplier of key fentanyl ingredients to the global pharmaceutical industry. This is because the illegal fentanyl trade started in the Pacific Ocean, originating in China.

As China began to crack down on abuses of its own trade routes, Mexico, half of which is controlled by huge drug cartels, quickly became a new center for mixing, adapting new chemical formulas, handling logistics and exporting illegal fentanyl. Today, the cartels control the largest trade route for fentanyl and fentanyl-like synthetic drugs to the US - not to mention conventional drugs. The border held open by Biden is like a free pass to that process. From the point of view of American Republicans, it does not matter much who takes the reins of government in Mexico City - the cartels will grow stronger with their intimidating, sick culture of violence and effective strategies of corruption within the Mexican state institutions.

The impeachment proceedings initiated by the neoliberal and neoconservative American elite against Donald Trump failed at the time. In the meantime, charges were brought against Trump - all in order to disqualify him from the next election in time. If these panic methods continue to fail and Trump manages to protect himself until the election results from the most depraved form - namely an assassination attempt against him - then he will be the president of the USA for the second time and, among other things, he will also have an eye on his political problem child, the US-Mexico border will keep If even American Republicans who are more moderate than Donald Trump support a military solution to the Mexican drug cartel problem, it is not too much to expect that Trump himself would initiate exactly this solution. There would certainly be no walking distance for the US forces involved. Most of its Latin American neighbor's northern and central territories lie in high, mountainous areas - not exactly an American specialty from a military point of view.

Whether the de-escalation of US geopolitical gunpowder barrels, Taiwan, and Israel has taken place at the given time will also play a big role. In light of the current "Biden doctrine", this is extremely unlikely.

Also, a lot depends on how kind Claudia Sheinbaum would be to her northern colleague. He would have six months to make an effective, reassuring offer to the then newly sworn-in US president, Trump.

They confronted the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia and promise "revenge". Important knowledge material!
During their 20 years of existence, the Houthis have become accustomed to continuous fighting for their Shia faith and their country. The crisis in Yemen has long remained an obscure and distant topic for most people.
During their 20 years of existence, the Houthis have become accustomed to continuous fighting for their Shia faith and their country. "Unfortunately, the Yemeni people cannot cope with the situation alone. But the major players in the region and the international community can help, because the solution is in their hands.

Therefore, we ask them to help our country and our people to end the war, to bring the warring parties to the negotiating table so that the search for a solution can begin that meets the interests of all forces in Yemen, the region and the world.

Security and stability in Yemen is an integral part of the security and stability of the region and the world." - said Ali Nasir Muhammad, former president of South Yemen (1980-86); - quote from the February 2018 conference of the Valdai Club.

Most people are only aware of global issues in the news.
If the media doesn't cover the story, we feel like the problem doesn't exist. For this reason, unlike events in Syria, Iraq or Afghanistan, the crisis in Yemen has long remained an obscure and distant topic for most people around the world.

But in these days, when the people of Yemen turned against the United States and its allies, things suddenly changed.

The Houthi movement was the only group in the region that (according to them) dared to tell the truth about the Israeli-Palestinian events and dared to stand up for the Palestinians.

Suddenly everyone started talking about them. On January 12, 2024, the US and the UK attacked the Houthis in Yemen.

The attack was in response to a blockade imposed by the Houthis against Israeli ships (as well as ships to and from Israel) in the Red Sea.

Millions of people around the world support the Houthis, officially known as the "Ansar Allah" movement. It is timely to learn more about this movement and gain a deeper understanding of what is happening in Yemen.

Nonstop war
It is quite difficult to surprise the Yemeni people with bombings. A bloody war has been raging in the region for years between the authorities and the Houthi rebels. (...)

Does it matter? Will he act effectively against Israel for its heinous crimes? They have a plan - and they will carry out that plan come hell or high water. Does anyone believe that the International Court of Justice will accuse Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinian people, especially in the Gaza Strip, as the South African government accuses?

Is there a lawyer or group of lawyers in the world who dares to condemn Israel for crimes against humanity?

And even if there were brave lawyers and judges who would take Israel to task for its heinous and cruel crimes, does anyone believe that Israel - or the Zionists who control Israel, are the drivers of the war; who are protected and supported by almost the entire western world, or rather the governments of the western world - would they turn a blind eye and pay attention?

VIDEO. International Court of Justice Hearings in The Hague
Click the screen to view the ICJ hearings, January 11, 2024.

They have an agenda - and they're going to carry out that agenda come hell or high water.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is the perfect "scapegoat" for this task. He is inhuman. He has no morals, no ethics. He is the ideal. That is why the USA and the "system" - or let's call it the Matrix - pushed him to the position of prime minister for the third time in November 2022.

Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu previously held the office of Prime Minister (PM) from 1996 to 1999 and then from 2009 to 2021. He is the president of the ultraconservative, neoliberal Likud party. Netanyahu is the longest-serving prime minister in the country's history, holding the position for a total of more than 16 years. He is also the first prime minister who was born in Israel after the establishment of Israel.

In November 2019, Netanyahu was formally charged with fraud, embezzlement and accepting bribes. He would probably be in prison if he hadn't been pushed into his third prime ministership - thanks to the support of the powerful Zionist lobby in the US and all those who do the bidding of the Zionists in the US and around the world. "Bibi" serves the interests of the Western elite better as Prime Minister of Israel than in prison.

Why?

Because Netanyahu is ideal - heartlessly murdering civilians, especially women and children, wiping out one or more generations of Palestinians - in order to create the multi-headed agenda, Greater Israel (see map).


Hend FQ on X: "Zionist plan for the Middle East: "Greater Israel", according to the founding father of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, a Jewish state that "from the brook of Egypt
The Zionists' Greater Israel is the Middle East, possibly the it would become the world's power house, just as predicted by the Talmud, which can be called the Israeli equivalent of the Christian Bible. The

power of the Chosen People has no limits and no one has to obey.

With the disappearance of Palestine, more than a trillion cubic meters (probably much more) of natural gas would be lost to Israel off the coast of the Gaza Strip. This is already the current plan.

Greater Israel would be the second or third largest power in terms of controlling the world's hydrocarbon reserves. And as we know, the world's energy supply is about 85% dependent on gasoline and natural gas.

Who is controls energy, controls the food supply. And whoever controls the food controls the people.

In order to further expand the power of Zionist Israel, Greater Israel's plan is also to bring the shipping lines under its control - and thus the European economy . Which is already happening today - Yemeni Houthis are pirating Israeli and American ships in the Red Sea, and any other nation's ships that try to supply Israel are attacked and captured by Houthi fighters in the Red Sea. The Red Sea is connected to the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal.

At least 18 European nations have already said they are avoiding the Suez Canal for "security reasons", meaning the cost of doing business with Asian markets will skyrocket. And for Arab Egypt, which owns the Suez Canal, the most important income would drop drastically.

But there is an alternative. The so-called Ben-Gurion Canal, which has been on the planning table since the early 1970s, would lead from the Mediterranean beyond the current Gaza border through Israel and the West Bank to the Red Sea, effectively rendering the Suez Canal redundant. A significant drop in shipping traffic could bankrupt the Suez Canal, which could destroy Egypt's economy. Closing the Suez Canal may be the logical next step.

In other worlds Greater Israel would potentially command the entire Western and Eastern European, Russian, Turkish and Syrian shipping lanes to prevent them from reaching their Asian market destinations. Of course, I could also bypass Africa and lose a third or a half of the business due to high costs and long delivery times.

Alternatively, everyone could use the "future" Ben Gurion Canal.

Does anyone still believe that the International Court of Justice would make one iota of difference to Greater Israel's aspirations, even if Israel were to be accused of genocide and told to stop and pay reparations to Palestine?

This would not stop Israel from pursuing its goal, nor would it stop Western nations, especially the US, from continuing to support Israel's murderous actions - which is already expanding into the West Bank and South Lebanon, and is soon preparing to annex all of Lebanon , as planned.

So what is this South African initiative to try to legally bring Israel to justice for its crimes against humanity? A mere fig leaf for Western morality and ethics?

Maybe it's more than that.

Perhaps an attempt to show the world whether international law still has a role - or, if not, to formalize the elite's rules-based order. For all to see. A wake-up call. One more so that the people and the politicians see that they are just puppets of a world-wide mess controlled by a small lawless elite, filthy rich people and above all corporations.

The South African initiative may have an agenda that doesn't meet the eye of the average politician, nor does it affect the immediate fate of Israel - but it could have consequences far beyond the Middle East.

It can become a blunt demonstration for Western civilization that our system is sick, so sick, recklessly lawless, without common sense; that this matrix must be abandoned and rebuilt by a society run by the people, for the people, by the people.

This is just a dream?

Well, every revolution, every paradigm shift of this magnitude, where light must replace the rule of darkness, began and will begin with a dream. With a multifaceted dream. A dream that lights a fire; a fire that burns away the garbage and creates fertile ground for new seeds to grow.

Muslims in Germany say they are suffering increasing abuse following the brutal attacks on Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023. People who show empathy for the suffering of innocent Palestinians in Gaza are "considered anti-Semitic," one person told DWImage (designed provocation to settled Muslims - we know why! - KJ)

"I lived through the weeks after 9/11. I feel like I've been taken back would have been there," said Suleman Malik, a Muslim from Thuringia, East Germany, recalling the 2001 terrorist attack on the United States.

He added that sometimes he feels like "I'm being led around the circus by the nose ring".

Malik said he knows that Muslims across Germany have been facing more and more accusations since Israel's war against Hamas began, such as women being yelled at for wearing headscarves, or communities receiving hate mail.

"What's missing," he told DW, "are people who say, 'You Muslims belong here, we will protect you.'"


Suleman Malik in front of the new Erfurt Mosque, the first newly built mosque in the former East Germany

. at the end of the century. Malik is fluent in German, works as a personnel consultant and is the deputy mayor of Erfurt's Reith district. In the past few years, he has also been involved in the construction of a small mosque in an industrial park on the outskirts of the city.

Muslims: partners in the fight against anti-Semitism

Malik said that people who empathize and express sympathy for the suffering of innocent Palestinian civilians in Gaza are immediately seen as "anti-Semitic, even if not all Jews think that the Israeli government is right do".

He condemned Hamas' terror against Israel and cited a passage in the Koran that forbids attacks on other people's religious sites.

He emphasized that "Muslims have a duty to protect Jewish life" and that those who do not do so have not understood the teachings of Islam.

German society, he said, should consider Muslims as partners in the fight against anti-Semitism.

Malik also spoke to DW about his native Thuringia and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, whose branch in Thuringia has been branded a far-right organization by the German interior.

"We have a party that has declared Islamophobia as part of its political program and currently enjoys the approval of nearly a third of the electorate in opinion polls," he said, adding that right-wing extremists demonstrate every week in front of his community's mosque.

Study confirms anti-Muslim sentiment in Germany

In June 2023, after several years of research, experts presented a comprehensive study entitled "Anti-Muslim Sentiment - Germany Takes Stock". The German federal government commissioned the independent expert group on anti-Muslim sentiment (UEM) to compile the report following the racist attack in the city of Hanau. Hanau in the state of Hesse was the site of the February 2020 attack in which a far-right extremist killed nine people with a migrant background.

The study clearly outlines the extent of anti-Muslim sentiment in German society, but above all it shows how little we know about it. This means, for example, that for a long time anti-Muslim hate crimes were rarely classified as such.

The report also makes it clear that "anti-Muslim sentiment is not a marginal phenomenon in society, but is widespread among a large part of the German population and has remained at a persistently high level for years."

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier with members of the Independent Expert Group on Anti-Muslim SentimentGerman President Frank-Walter Steinmeier with members of the Independent Expert Group on Anti-Muslim Sentiment.


According to the study's authors, anti-Muslim sentiment has been at a "persistently high level" in Germany for years.

However, after the bloody terrorist attack by Hamas against Israel on October 7, 2023, in which the militants killed 1,200 people and took another 240 hostages, and especially since the demonstrations on the streets of Germany - some celebrating the attacks and even denying Israel's right to exist - the study generated little controversy. Even the federal government's "German Islamic conference" held at the Ministry of the Interior in November only played a superficial role. The political agenda seems to have rearranged itself.

Was the recent arson attack in Hessen racially motivated?

This relegation of importance comes despite increasing reports of mosque attacks, property damage and threatening anti-Muslim messages across the country in the weeks following the Hamas attack. The most dramatic such case occurred when a house was set on fire in Wächtersbach in Hesse shortly before Christmas.

On the house "Foreigners out!" scrawled graffiti that read, prompting authorities to question whether the crime was racially motivated. The investigation is ongoing. The house was occupied by a Pakistani family who had lived in the village for a long time and whose members, like Malik, had fitted in well.

Malik said he was frustrated that there were too few statistics and too few facts about anti-Muslim attacks in Germany. New statistics tracking anti-Muslim crimes in the final months of 2023, for example, have not yet been released, but staff at the information centers say there is a significant increase.

"There is a significant Muslim population that lives happily here in Germany and shares the country's social values," former journalist Süleyman Bag said in Berlin. "We're starting to lose sight of this normalcy".

Muslims are often portrayed as the problem in German society, but intelligence reports clearly show that right-wing and left-wing extremism pose a much greater threat than Islamic extremism.


Hate in the field of deeds? The house of a Muslim family in Hesse was set on fire.

One form of hatred should not blind people to other forms of discrimination

Even Güvercin, a representative of the liberal Alhambra Society, said that it is not enough to look only at anti-Muslim sentiments, as they are only an isolated form of hatred.

He said that while anti-Muslim sentiment was of course "an important issue", a "victim race" in which one form of hatred blinds people to other forms of hatred and discrimination must be avoided.

According to Güvercin, if Muslim society does not speak openly about its own problems, such as anti-Semitic stereotypes and hatred of Jews, it will not be able to overcome the discrimination it has experienced.

According to Güvercin, the same applies to all of Germany.

"Politicians and society need to get more serious about how to confront the rise of racism," he said.

This is why the June 2023 report on anti-Muslim sentiment and its findings and recommendations are so important for politicians. According to Güvercin, politicians must also finally deal with the issue of racism more seriously than they have done so far.

Friday, January 12, 2024 was Day 2 in The Hague, also known as the "Peace Palace", where the International Court of Justice (ICJ) convened for the second time to discuss the crisis unfolding in Gaza. The proceedings began yesterday at the initiative of South Africa, with the accusation that Israel is committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.

Yesterday, January 11, the South African legal team had the opportunity to argue the Expose report, and today the Israeli legal team responded.

Response from the Israeli legal team. Israel has rejected charges brought by South Africa to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that its actions in the Gaza Strip amount to genocide. On the second day of public hearings at the world body in The Hague, Israel's legal representatives claimed that South Africa's case was "baseless", "absurd" and "slanderous", saying that Israel was not seeking to destroy a people but to protect its people, and their arguments were revolve around his "right to self-defense" following the attacks by Hamas on October 7.

Israeli lawyers also argued that there was no evidence to prove "genocidal intent" and asked the International Court of Justice to dismiss the case.

Inevitable Death and Suffering

Christopher Staker, a lawyer representing Israel, said: "Inevitable death and human suffering in any conflict is not, by itself, a pattern of conduct that credibly demonstrates genocidal intent." In addition, Malcolm Shaw, a professor of international law representing Israel, said the case involved only the charge of genocide, which "stands alone among violations of international law as the epitome of evil."

If the genocide charge were brought incorrectly, "the essence of this crime would be lost," he said. Shaw added that such evidence was missing from the arguments presented by South Africa a day earlier. The lawyer argued that the October 7, 2023 attack required Israel to defend itself.

South Africa's arguments

But South Africa's legal team provided overwhelming evidence of genocide against the Palestinian people on its first day at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, as reported here yesterday. Source:

Living Hell

Irish lawyer Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh, who was part of the South African legal team, was praised for his shocking speech against Israel's conduct in the Gaza Strip: "The first genocide in history where the victims broadcast their own destruction in real time in that desperate , so far in the vain hope that the world might do something".

Binne Ni Ghrálaigh, who previously worked on the Bloody Sunday Inquiry, the Gaza Strip (14 years ago) and the Genocide Trials v. Serbia,

"Interim measures are urgently needed to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the irreparable harm caused by Israel's violations of the UN Genocide Convention."

He continued: "The Secretary-General and his leaders variously describe the situation in Gaza as a crisis for humanity, a living hell, a bloodbath, a situation of total immersion and unparalleled horror, where an entire population is besieged and attacked, denied access to the basic things necessary for survival en masse. See the video below.

Understandably, many people think that even if Israel is found guilty, nothing will change, and while it can be assumed that Israel will simply ignore the IJB, as it has done in the past, Francis Boyle, the That's not the case, according to a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law who read the South African legal team's submissions ahead of the proceedings.Based on his

judgment, knowledge and experience, the professor says that South Africa will win over the Palestinians in Gaza. the suspension order against Israel due to genocide against its people, and according to the professor, this would have significant consequences.For

example, Israel would be suspended from the UN, and Palestine could be recognized as a UN nation, and no UN nation was destroyed, and sanctions could be imposed on Israel , and some individuals could be indicted for war crimes. (See the video for more details).

If Israel were found to be committing genocide, it would have ramifications not only for Israel, but also for the states that support the attacks on the Palestinians, without whom they would not be possible.

"It's anti-Jewish"

The same old tropes are being used in The Hague today that were used during the attack on Gaza. "However, this is wrong according to Jewish law, not only according to international law," Rabbi Dovid Feldman said yesterday from outside The Hague.

23,210 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces in continuous attacks over the past three months, at least 70% of whom are believed to be women and children, and some 7,000 Palestinians are still missing, presumed dead under the rubble, we heard from The Hague yesterday.

We have all seen the absolute horror show in real time, images of innocent people mutilated, bloody, suffering, homeless, orphaned, dead, dead. To find all this too horrible, repulsive and intolerable, and to express our support for the people of Gaza, is not the same as anti-Semitism.

The attacks on innocent people in Gaza are inhumane, if the International Court of Justice does not order an end to the destruction in Gaza after three months, what message does this send to other despots?

Reuters and VOA report that US and British warplanes have begun attacking Houthi targets in Yemen, marking the first major regional expansion of the war in Gaza. According to Politico: The US and the UK, backed by Australia, the Netherlands, Bahrain and Canada, conducted joint strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen tonight, according to a DOD official. American planes, ships and submarines took part in the strikes.

According to the Telegraph, British fighter jets and ships are also taking part in the military action against the Houthis. There are reports of large-scale airstrikes against major cities in Yemen. Unverified videos started coming through social media. The video below has not been confirmed at this early stage...

One Middle East correspondent notes that "we have gone from the US prioritizing ending the war in Yemen to the US taking action against the rebels who control Yemen. Both the Yemeni and the the regional consequences of the war in Gaza are fully visible, with heavy casualties on trade and maritime shipping".

Al Arabiya reported that "heavy airstrikes are hitting the area around Hodeidah city" and that Sana'a was also bombed.

According to emerging news, American bases in Iraq may also be attacked. In addition, the Houthis say they are retaliating against Western warships in the Red Sea.

As in America's "War on Terror" for the past twenty years, Congress has once again taken a backseat... Meanwhile...

Update (1730ET):... and a statement from the White House is expected soon:

BRITISH SUN AUTHORIZES JOINT MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST THE HOUTHIK.

And the Times (UK) reported it an hour ago:
Britain is expected to join the United States in carrying out airstrikes against Houthi military positions in Yemen on Thursday night - Times

The Houthis have said they are not intimidated by American and British threats. While the US won't confirm future military operations before they take place, Reuters reported the following details from the UK side:

Britain is expected to join the US in launching airstrikes "within hours" against Iran-backed Houthi military positions in Yemen - reported the political editor of the Times newspaper on Thursday.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Downing Street office did not respond to Reuters' inquiries, and the Pentagon and the White House declined to comment on the report.

Western coalition fighter jets are reported to be in the air...
Update (1710ET): The government is expected to soon launch airstrikes against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, following repeated attacks on both merchant shipping and US and coalition warships in the Red Sea.

According to the latest news, the strikes are expected "shortly" - but there is some confusion and conflicting statements about whether President Biden will speak. Choreographed statements are also expected from the UK and other international allies.

Yemeni military sources warned that "Any UK attack on Yemen will be met with heavy and 'painful strikes on all British bases, warships, ships and navigation' - a threat extended to the US. The chat

and rumors are growing of reports that the Western coalition is putting together a plan to launch an offensive against the continued Houthi attacks in the Red Sea... "If approved at an emergency meeting of the British cabinet tonight, military action will be carried out in partnership with the US against Houthi forces in Yemen," reported journalist Halah Jaber, a former contributor to the Sunday Times, on X.

In addition, al-Arabiya reported on Thursday afternoon that the U.S. military is "increasing its readiness plans for a near-term response against Yemen's Houthis." , while also noting that Washington's "repeated warnings" have failed to stop the attacks.

So far there has been a lot of empty threats and posturing by Western defense leaders, but after at least 25 major missile and drone attacks targeting commercial ships and shipping lanes in the Red Sea, there has not yet been a single instance of US, British or other coalition warships directly striking back at Houthi launch sites.

As predicted, the Iran-allied Houthis just got bolder:

The leader of Yemen's Houthi militia vowed on Thursday to step up attacks on ships in the Red Sea, Bab El Mandab and the Gulf of Aden, just hours after the UN Security Council passed a resolution calling on the Houthis to stop their attacks.

The Houthis have boldly and proudly claimed to have directly targeted at least one U.S. Navy warship and are now promising more attacks:

And it has repeated its threats to attack U.S. Navy ships more forcefully if they target its forces. "Retaliation to any US strike will not only be at the level of the current operation, which involved more than 24 drones and several missiles, but will be bigger," Al-Houthi added.

The attack cited on Tuesday night was the largest of the war so far (since October 7), and the Houthis said they were specifically trying to hit a US warship amid a barrage of shells that included drones.

Meanwhile, The Guardian highlights in a recent opinion piece that the Houthis have already bluffed the West with weakness, i.e. "Operation Prosperity Guardian":

But the risk of Houthi drones getting through is potentially worse, which suggests in Washington that the US should take a more active approach apply.

"If we just sit there in a defensive position, sooner or later some missile or drone will get through and kill sailors," said Michael Allen, a former White House national security policy expert.

The Houthis may continue to receive bloodshed from Western navies, given that they are using $20,000 drones to draw response from $1 million anti-aircraft interceptor missiles.

The Guardian points out that this makes it "difficult to imagine the emboldened Houthis ceasing their campaign, given their access to relatively cheap missiles and drones and their desire to resist the West".

after the US coalition bombarded more than 60 targets with Tomahawk missiles and airstrikes. Thursday night's major US- and British-led strikes on Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen, while posing a significant risk of the Gaza war escalating into a regional conflict, still do not appear to have deterred the Iran-backed rebel group from its determination to attack the Red- sea ​​shipping and even Western warships.

Brigadier General Yahya Saree, a Houthi spokesman, released a videotaped speech in which he said: "The American and British enemies bear full responsibility for their criminal aggression against our Yemeni people, and it will not go unanswered and unpunished." Houthi sources counted more than 70 strikes in five regions of Yemen, indicating that at least five people were killed in the attacks. According to the Pentagon, more than 100 different types of missiles were launched.

The US Air Force Middle East Command said in a statement that a combination of aircraft, destroyers and a submarine were deployed and that Houthi "command and control nodes, ammunition depots, launch systems, production facilities and air defense radar systems" were hit in the operation, which took place in the Red Sea followed repeated Houthi attacks on ships. "I will not hesitate to order additional measures if necessary to protect our people and the free flow of international trade," President Biden said in a written statement.


"These strikes are a direct response to unprecedented Houthi attacks on international maritime vessels in the Red Sea - including the first-ever use of ballistic missiles against ships," the US commander in chief added.

According to more details, the various weapon systems and platforms were used:

More than 15 F/A-18 Super Hornet strike fighters were involved, operating from the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier, reports Fox News citing unnamed Pentagon sources. Unnamed fighter jets of the air force operating from a base in the Middle East also took part in the attack. Newsweek has not yet verified these reports.

The guided-missile submarine USS Florida and US surface ships fired Tomahawk cruise missiles. It is unclear what other ships were involved in the bombardment, but US Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers have been active in the Red Sea in recent months.

But while it was intense, it was a relatively short attack that probably lasted no more than 30 minutes, or definitely less than an hour. Videos of large fireballs lighting up the night sky flooded social media as key cities such as Sa'ana and the port city of Hodeidah, which remain large population centers, were hit.

But the key lesson here is that after this brief fireworks display, which many officials complained came too late (although some US lawmakers have already pointed out that there was no congressional approval), the Houthis are likely to resume their attacks soon. It is also likely that as the crisis drags on, new rounds of coalition strikes will eventually occur in Yemen. Thursday night's attack is likely indeed to further reduce commercial shipping in Red Sea waters now war-torn:

ARMY ADVISES SHIPS TO AVOID BAB EL-MANDEB: INTERTANKO NOTES
OIL SHIPPING COMPANY STOPS RED SEA ROUTES AFTER US STRIKES: BBG
Hafnia has halted all southern Red Sea shipping, according to a statement from a company spokesman.
A tanker transporting Saudi crude oil to Suez turns over in front of the Gulf of Aden: BBG
There are widely circulating (unverified) videos of large fireballs visible on the horizon...

A spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hussein al-Ezzi, admitted in a statement that "American and British ships, submarines and a massive aggressive attack by warplanes," and went on to say that "America and Britain must undoubtedly be prepared to pay a heavy price and bear all the terrible consequences of this blatant aggression."

Mohammed Abdul-Salam, the Houthis' chief negotiator and spokesman, also said that Western powers had "committed stupidity with this insidious aggression."

"They were wrong to think that this would deter Yemen from supporting Palestine and Gaza," he said in an online statement, and vowed that "the targeting will continue to affect Israeli ships or those heading to the ports of occupied Palestine."

Yemeni residents remain defiant, taking part in large anti-US protests on Friday...


The Pentagon said it has no immediate plans to send additional troops or assets to the region and will monitor the situation as all eyes turn to U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria as U.S. forces prepare for possible retaliatory attacks by Iran-backed militias.

Importantly, CENTCOM specifically named the Iranians. "We hold the Houthi militias and their destabilizing Iranian backers responsible for the illegal, indiscriminate and reckless attacks on international shipping that have so far affected 55 nations, including endangering the lives of hundreds of sailors, including those of the United States," said USCENTCOM Commander General Michael Erik Kurilla. .

Meanwhile, Dave DeCamp at AntiWar.com provides the following brief background on the history of the war in Yemen, dating back to 2015. Interestingly, Saudi Arabia quickly distanced itself from Thursday night's major Western coalition operation...

The United States and its allies have killed civilians in Yemen before: the United Nations estimates in 2021 that some 377,000 people died in the U.S.-backed, 2015- began in the war against the Houthis supported by Saudi Arabia and the United States. More than half died of starvation and disease caused by the blockade and the coalition's brutal bombing campaign.

The strikes risk upending a fragile ceasefire between the Houthis and the Saudi-led coalition since April 2022, although the Saudis have distanced themselves from US anti-Houthi activity in the Red Sea.

Some members of Congress have criticized President Biden for launching strikes in Yemen without congressional authorization. "The president should go to Congress before launching a strike against the Houthis in Yemen and getting involved in yet another conflict in the Middle East. That's Article I of the Constitution," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) wrote on X.

whose sin was that he dared to criticize Biden and Zelensky and wrote the truth about the conflict in Ukraine.
American journalist Gonzalo Lira died in a Ukrainian prison - "He was guilty" of the crime of opinion
Washington and Kiev's more than strange alliance, together they eliminate those who are considered dangerous, one of the new victims of this process is Gonzalo Lira, an American journalist whose "sin" that he dared to criticize Joe Biden and Volodymyr Zelensky. The man was taken into pretrial detention in Ukraine, and then, let's face it, not surprisingly, he died in prison for unknown reasons.
Lira's death was announced by Keith Klarenberg, a journalist from The Grayzone news site, on his X (Twitter) account:

"Gonzalo Lira is dead. His family confirmed it. I didn't agree with him on almost anything. However, an American journalist should not have died like this in a Ukrainian prison," he wrote. one of the colleagues of the murdered journalist.

The news of Lira's death was also reported by Tucker Carlson, who interviewed the journalist's father a few weeks ago:

"The victim's father, Gonzalo Lira, said that his 55-year-old son died in a Ukrainian prison, where he was held for criticizing the Zelenskyi and Biden governments. Gonzalo Lira was an American citizen, but the Biden administration clearly agreed to imprison him and torture him. I spoke with his father a few weeks ago, who foresaw that his son would be killed."

Elon Musk also reacted to the news of the American journalist's death. Patron X (Twitter) wrote this to David Sachs' post on the topic of businessman:
- The chaos is huge.

Sachs, on the other hand, wrote:
"The Biden administration could have saved Gonzalo Lira with a simple phone call, but they didn't lift a finger. So the Ukrainian government understood that it could act with impunity."

The Kyiv regime has not confirmed Lira's death. Instead, the US State Department did it.

In May 2023, Ukrainian security service SBU arrested Chilean-American dual citizen journalist Gonzalo Lira in the Kharkiv region, released him on bail, and arrested him again in July when he allegedly tried to leave Ukraine.

Before he was re-arrested, Gonzalo Lira managed to post several messages on X (Twitter) in which he described the prison system and how he was beaten, tortured and denied medical help even though he was seriously ill: "Now I am about

to , to get out of Ukraine and apply for political asylum in Hungary or Romania. Either I cross the border and get to safety, or I disappear forever because the Kiev regime will kill me.

Unfortunately, the latter happened.

The charges for which he was imprisoned, tortured and eventually killed were: "justifying Russia's aggression in Ukraine" and "spreading Russian ideas on social media".

In other words, Gonzalo Lira paid with his life for daring to speak the truth about the armed conflict in Ukraine. The case is also an excellent example of the fact that the Biden administration disregards the lives of its own citizens if they threaten their globalist/satanic rhetoric and interests.

Gonzalo Lira criticized the Zelenskyi government on the spot in Ukraine. We live in what I call the New Age of Orthodoxy, in which doctrinaire and seemingly unquestionable representations of complicated matters are forged, spread, and passionately embraced by millions with astonishing speed.

When we launched the Brave Speech subsite in October 2022, one of our goals was to interview individuals who were challenging the new orthodoxy on a range of public policy issues.

Before 2020, Dr. McCullough and I never considered ourselves dissidents. Questioning the bizarre and unconstitutional federal pandemic response made us dissidents. Inevitably, we found ourselves asking the question:

If the government is lying to us about COVID-19, what else is it lying about?

As a result of Dr. McCullough's prominent role in questioning responses to the pandemic, he is often sought out by people around the world who recognize his open mind and willingness to listen to dissenting views on a wide variety of topics.

One such dissident was Gonzalo Lira, an American journalist who lived in Ukraine and reported (mainly on Twitter) about the events there. Peter talked to him at length, took notes and wished him well. Then he suggested I consider interviewing Mr. Lira for our Substack.

I was hesitant because I had never met Mr. Lira and knew nothing about his background, character or mental health. One of my favorite books on the Cold War is Stalin's Apologist: Walter Duranty: The New York Times's Man in Moscow by SJ Taylor. For those of you who haven't heard of Duranty, he was an Englishman employed by the Times as its Moscow bureau chief in the late 1920s and early 1930s.

Pretty much everything Duranty wrote, especially his vehement denial of the Holodomor in Ukraine, was pro-Stalin propaganda. At the time, the prevailing bien pensant opinion of Stalin in the United States was that he was a great guy who would realize the socialist dream of stupid Western intellectuals (precisely in Russia).

To be sure, I felt that Mr. Lira's instincts and insights about the war were correct, but it bothered me that I had no way of corroborating or corroborating his account. This in itself is another bizarre feature of our new orthodox era - namely, that we have no newspapers outside of the Epoch Times that report anything seriously. The younger generation of journalists now working at America's legacy newspapers seem to me like a pack of brainwashed automatons.

Yesterday, as we waited for our late departure at Washington's Reagan Airport, Peter broke the news to me that Gonzala Lira had apparently died in Ukrainian custody, where she had been held for several months after being arrested for her sharp criticism of the Zelenskyi and Biden administration's lackeys.

At that moment, I regretted never interviewing him. If I had, I would have asked him: Are you ready to die for your mission to tell what you believe to be the truth about the war in Ukraine?

Since the arrest and indefinite detention of Julian Assange, it has become clear that the US government does not care about journalists who stand up to the military-industrial complex. Moreover, I have no doubt that our masters would be more than happy to send all such troublemakers to the gulag.

Peter seemed to read my mind because he then asked me, "Do you think other people who question orthodoxy will be killed?"

"I don't know," I replied. "I think it all depends on the dissident, the size of his following and the tolerance level of the tyrant he's challenging."

The only thing I can say for sure is that nothing would surprise me now. Western republics are destabilized, and their governments are increasingly shadowy and unconstrained by constitutional law or budgetary constraints. The legacy press is now almost completely at the mercy of those in power. Note that in the case of Gonzalo Lira, many Western journalists seem to think that five to seven years in a prison labor camp is a fitting punishment for criticizing the Zelensky regime. NOT a stern warning, a little jail time to scare her, and finally deportation - but up to seven years in prison, apparently without proper medical care, as Lira appears to have died of severe pneumonia while in custody.

The end result is that there are fewer and fewer obstacles to the introduction of tyranny, and for most of history limited government of the people by the people, for the people, by the people, for the people has been the great exception, NOT the norm.

Tucker Carlson recently published (starting at 3:36) the video below, which Lira claims she filmed near the Hungarian border last summer. As he claims in the video, he was just trying to cross the border and apply for asylum in Hungary. As fate would have it, he was arrested at the border and detained, where he died about six months later.

The local representative of Putin's party, Vladimir Egorov, was found dead in front of his house in Tobolsk. According to Baza, the 46-year-old politician may have fallen from the third floor of the house.
According to Kommersant, preliminary investigations found no signs of a crime on him. And the local duma only announced that Egorov's death was caused by an accident. At the same time, they recognized his merits for providing support to the soldiers fighting in the "special military operation".
Since the outbreak of the war, there have been serious problems with Russian windows and doors: Ravil Maganov, the director of Lukoil, fell out of a hospital window last fall, but so did Marina Jankina, the head of department of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the 28-year-old vice president of Loko-Bank, a federal judge and more. also two Russian businessmen. However, the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin of the Wagner leadership was already caused by a helicopter accident. (CNN)
Also:
- The director of the Russian Lukoil fell out of the hospital window
- A Russian military official fell out of the window
- The 28-year-old vice president of a Russian bank fell out of the window
- Now a Russian judge fell out of the window of his apartment under mysterious circumstances
- A few days after each other, two Russian businessman died mysteriously, in the same place
- An influential Russian leader fell out of the window and died a monster
- Another Russian fell out of the window of his apartment, now a judge died
- Fresh: Someone "fell" out of the window again in Russia

"It's about more than fighting an unpopular contract." "It would be too short-sighted to reduce the recently launched sovereignty initiative to the WHO pandemic treaty. It is more about fundamental issues - which also shows the diversity of the committee." Request the author of the text of the initiative.

The collection of signatures for the so-called sovereignty initiative, whose text was written by the author of this article, began in mid-October. Of course, not without having it checked by about five esteemed colleagues, because anything else would be dubious for such an important project. "For the effective protection of constitutional rights (sovereignty initiative)" - this is the official title of the initiative, as published in the Federal Gazette. But what exactly is it about?

Since the initiative is co-chaired by two representatives of Mass-Voll and Friends of the Constitution, the media's attention is currently being directed to the WHO's pandemic convention. It is a dangerous contract if it gives the WHO as much real power as is currently feared. However, the final text of the contract is not yet available. Just this month, WHO Director-General Tedros Tedros was prosecuted for embezzlement and sex crimes in his home country of Ethiopia, despite the presumption of innocence.

The fight against the single contract would be unnecessary.

At the same time, a simple initiative against a single treaty, which could be challenged by a referendum, would be unnecessary. This alone shows that the newly launched case must be about more than just fighting an unpopular contract.

And in fact: the term "pandemic" or WHO does not appear anywhere in the entire text of the initiative. Instead, they want to introduce a new fundamental article in the federal constitution that declares certain types of international treaties generally unacceptable. On the one hand, there are treaties that would oblige Switzerland to interfere with the fundamental rights of its citizens. On the other hand, it would be forbidden to conclude international treaties that would oblige Switzerland to follow the jurisdiction of other states or supranational bodies. In simpler terms, this would also rule out a new version of the framework agreement with the EU - at least one that would once again provide for an arbitration court that would limit the independence of Swiss courts. (...)

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Briana Ross details how she believes the hospital treating her husband Jason for COVID-19 contributed to his death by refusing to treat him with ivermectin, instead giving him remdesivir, fentanyl and a range of other drugs before insisting he to be put on a ventilator.

In September 2021, Briana MacDowell Ross of Georgia was preparing to celebrate her first wedding anniversary with husband Jason Christopher Ross, an Army combat veteran with whom she has three young children.

But later that month, Briana, Jason and their children became ill. The family followed America's Frontline Doctors' COVID-19 protocol, but while Briana and the children recovered quickly, Jason did not.

Jason's worsening illness soon led to a positive COVID-19 diagnosis and on October 7, 2021, he was admitted to Piedmont Fayette Hospital in Fayetteville, Georgia.

On October 25th, Jason died at the age of 36 - a victim of the hospital's COVID-19 protocols, Briana said, which included administration of remdesivir and fentanyl and being placed on a ventilator.

Briana, who is now a single mother of three, spoke to The Defender about Jason's experiences at the hospital and the difficulties she faced in obtaining his medical findings. He shared medical records with The Defender to back up his story.

After the positive COVID diagnosis, "that was it,"

according to Briana, although Jason was eligible for Veterans Affairs because they didn't live near a US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital, they went to the local hospital.

According to Briana, medical staff at Piedmont were "aware" from the beginning that Jason was not vaccinated against COVID-19, which she says led to the mistreatment.

Because Jason's oxygen levels were very low, they initially sought treatment at local urgent care facilities, but were turned away. According to Briana, one facility told her they wouldn't accept her husband's VA insurance — but they also wouldn't accept cash because her husband was insured.

That left them with the local hospital.

Briana said,

"I heard things, stories about hospitals, [but] I didn't know anybody personally that had anything happen to them in the hospital. I was just praying and looking at him and he looked like he was struggling to breathe. So I kind of freaked out and that I said, 'We have to go to the hospital'."

He said he assumed that if he was there and could tell the hospital staff what not to do, everything would be fine. She told the medical staff that she needed to know what treatment Jason was receiving before she would approve it and insisted that he not be put on a ventilator.

A nurse reassured him, saying, "We're just going to give him oxygen and check his vital signs."

But after Jason tested positive for COVID-19, "that was it," Briana said. "They took him back and I couldn't see him, I couldn't be with him, even though we slept in the same bed the night before and every night," she said.

Briana was told to leave the hospital, but "she was on the phone every shift." But during the first phone call, a nurse told her her husband wouldn't be coming home that night, with "some attitude," Brianna recalled.

"I kept calling shifts to get updates," Brianna said. "I have all the records, but it doesn't really matter because every single time they lied and withheld a lot of information."

The morning after Jason was admitted, Briana received a call from a doctor at the hospital who "screamed into the phone" that Jason was "going to die if he didn't get on a ventilator." Briana again refused, but over the next few days, doctors "kept on the ventilator."

On Jason's third day in the hospital, which coincided with the couple's first wedding anniversary, Briana was allowed a brief visit. But at the hospital, Brianna said she saw her husband in a "glass room" as a nurse warned her that "if you try to go through that door, I'm going to call security."

"I was just standing there looking at him, talking to him through the glass, and what I saw really upset me," Briana said.

Briana noted that her family members were nurses and that she was familiar with certain nursing practices, and when she asked the nurses on duty if, for example, she had been "slid into the supine position and back," the nurses responded in the negative.

He also recalled seeing Jason's oxygen levels drop sharply after the nurses intervened, but again the nurses and doctors were dismissive. Instead, a pulmonologist told him, "You're not going to be on a ventilator."

Briana asked the doctor about other treatments, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, but was told those treatments were "not good." When Briana continued to ask the pulmonologist for answers, he "became very frustrated with me" and showed her the ventilator down the hall.

"He said he was 'ready to leave,' and he was just trying to talk me into it," Briana said. When she refused again, he "took off his glove, knotted it, rolled it into a ball and threw it over my head, which hit the wall and fell into the trash can. He was very aggressive ... and then he walked away angrily," she recalled.

Afterwards, Briana said that the nurse,

"Now I think I wish I had walked through that door," Briana said. "But when I left, I started working on getting him out of there."

The hospital staff "terrorized her"

Briana's efforts to get Jason discharged were unsuccessful, especially since any option required paperwork that the hospital staff had to sign - an insurmountable obstacle.

Briana said:

"They sent their team of nurses and doctors to go in and terrorize him. They had been drugging him for days. By then they had given him Xanax and started him on remdesivir and he was so weak and tired and that's all they did to him. Alone he was. He was literally imprisoned in such a way that he couldn't really resist."

She said one of the nurses told her that if Jason left the hospital, they couldn't help him. This meant that "we would have had to turn off all the machines [for ourselves], then he would have had to get up, get dressed ... walk down this quarter-mile corridor to the elevator and come to me in the lobby , and he should have gone through another corridor first".

"I wouldn't be able to go up and help him," Briana added. "I wouldn't be able to get a wheelchair. They wouldn't be able to bring him down in a wheelchair or help him. No one would. . . . And so they made it impossible for us to get him out unless we did something 'illegal' or 'against the rules.'

'They tried to turn us against each other'

By the next day, Jason appeared to be on the mend, but the hospital said he would have to stay "another night". But the next day, Briana said, they called her at 6 a.m. and insisted she was weak and needed to be put on a ventilator.

Briana said she saved tons of texts from Jason saying he was "starving" and thirsty, but the hospital staff wouldn't let him eat because they didn't want him to aspirate.

He barely ate or drank anything, he said. "And it was loaded with drugs, as the medical records later revealed."

This treatment was accompanied by what Briana called a "gaslighting" as she discovered that hospital staff had told Jason not to listen to her and that Briana was a "conspiracy theorist" who had "no medical degree".

"They tried to turn us against each other," Briana said.

The treatment took such a toll on Jason that he finally agreed to be put on a ventilator, telling Briana that "I'm so exhausted."

According to Briana, the doctors told her that Jason "is working so hard trying to breathe ... and his heart is tired and his body is tired." They claimed the ventilator would "rest your lungs and give you rest so your body can heal, and then you can wake up and come off the ventilator healthy and healed."

Briana said she eventually relented, recalling that her "hands were tied because no one was working with me," including the hospital's patient rights representative and local attorneys who, she said, "didn't even do anything about the COVID ".

"Creepy, scary and disgusting horror show,"

Briana said Jason initially appeared to be getting better and was taken off the ventilator by the third day. But then hospital staff told him they had to stop his weaning because something was wrong. She was subsequently diagnosed with pseudomonas, a hospital-acquired infection.

Two days later, Jason was back on the mend after receiving antibiotics. "He was taken off the ventilator again," Briana said. "Then this new doctor came in and said, 'No, we have to start over, he's trying to breathe through the ventilator.'"

Briana resisted the hospital's efforts to get Jason fully ventilated again and brought up the ivermectin once again, but the new doctor "squealed" and "laughed" at him.

That evening, Briana received a call from the hospital telling her that Jason had "coded" - but no further details. When he arrived at the hospital in the morning, the pulmonologist told him, "There is no hope."

"I asked them, 'If they've been telling me all this time that I can't do any of my procedures, but they're saying yours doesn't work, can we use mine?'" referring to the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. But they still weren't willing to treat Jason with ivermectin or whatever Briana suggested.

One doctor told Briana when she asked about ivermectin that it "causes kidney failure."

A kidney disease doctor Briana spoke with offered to use a dialysis machine, but then withdrew the offer, because Jason's "blood pressure got too low." According to Briana, when she asked what could be done to get his blood pressure back up, another doctor told her, "Your husband's not doing well."

Later, according to Briana, a nurse told her: “Her husband is not going to make it through the night.”

Briana said the experience felt like being “in a movie or a TV show — a horror movie — a really creepy and scary and disgusting horror.”

She said she had previously refused to sign a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, but had agreed - or thought she had agreed - that her husband would be "turned over" if his heart rate dropped below a certain threshold. That's when hospital staff told her that Jason could still go on dialysis, Briana said.

But something didn't feel right, he said, claiming the nurse who told him "seemed a little too happy." Now, he believes, "that's how they were able to get me to sign the DNR without me signing the DNR because I had to agree to be turned over, put something in his neck, to do that process, and then right away are also translated back".

"When it was flipped," Briana continued, "it coded and that was it."

Briana was then called into her husband's room. "She was naked, without a sheet, in the middle while the whole medical staff was doing CPR... It was so horrible and I really felt like they were trying to punish me in some way... they insisted I go in".

The staff told Briana that they would not perform CPR for more than 15 minutes, despite her insistence that they continue. They stopped after 15 minutes and "announced death before I could say anything."

Remdesivir was administered despite a diagnosis of acute kidney injury

Jason's end of life marked the beginning of yet another battle for Briana as she battled the hospital for his medical records. He had to visit the hospital several times to get the full record.

"What helped me the most was the itemized list of medications," Briana said.

According to the COVID-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (CHBMP), the drugs included remdesivir, adrenaline, anti-anxiety drugs, blood thinners, antihypertensives, diuretics, fentanyl, insulin, Lasix, midazolam, painkillers, paralyzing drugs, precedent, propofol, sedatives and Xanax.

"One of the huge things I learned was that he was diagnosed with acute kidney injury when he was admitted, and no one ever told me that," Briana said. "On admission, the emergency department doctor wrote in the notes... 'The patient is not suitable for remdesivir due to acute kidney injury'. And the next day in the intensive care unit, they started giving it to him".

"I also found out that [Jason] was given the same drugs towards the end of the protocol as the lethal injection." The hospital administered the most fentanyl "at the highest possible dose," he said. "That was sick... It's literally like my husband was euthanized."

Briana said she learned about the hospital's COVID-19 protocols after the fact and now blames them for her husband's death.

"I know more about him than I wanted to know," he said. "It was all the COVID hospital protocol, and it was a one-size-fits-all model."

'Action is very, very healing'

Raising three children as a single mother is "very difficult and exhausting", said Briana. "There is no other person who can rest".

She said she was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder "from everything I saw and what happened in the hospital. They just abused her and me," Briana said.

Among other things, Briana tries to cope by participating in the work of CHBMP and the FormerFeds Freedom Foundation, of which she is currently the Georgia State President.

"I need these people," Briana said. "They understand."

As Georgia State Chair, she is active on legislative issues and local initiatives, blogs at FormerFeds Substack, and works on the group's social media presence. He is also involved in a class action lawsuit filed by FormerFeds against Gilead, the distributor of remdesivir.

"I try to educate people every day through social media," Briana said, adding that she draws on her marketing degree to create content that appeals to the public.

Briana encourages victims and their families to join FormerFeds and CHBMP.

"Everyone will understand you. They all went through the same thing. You can learn a lot. You can find your people, those who believe in you. It's a wonderful feeling to have such support, the action is very, very healing".

Testimony of Drs McCullough, Cole and Milhoan before the US Congress on the long-term health effects of genetic vaccines - Full hearing. On Friday, January 12, 2024, Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene held a historic US congressional panel at the Rayburn Building on Capitol Hill to find out why the COVID-19 vaccination continues to cause record-breaking injuries, disabilities and deaths for years to come. even after the 2021 primary series.

The hearing was attended by US representatives Greene (R-GA), Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) and Any Biggs (R-AZ), and the witnesses were Dr. Peter McCullough, adult internist, cardiologist, They were Dr. Ryan Cole, Clinical Pathologist, and Dr. Kirk Milhoan, Pediatrician, Pediatric Cardiologist.

The two-hour session was non-stop, from opening speeches and questions from lawmakers to experts. The event was broadcast live on several channels, and the press conducted interviews with representatives of Greene and Johnson. The audience included stakeholders including those who have suffered injuries from the COVID-19 vaccine, students, business leaders, independent media and Children's Health Defense.

They provided the Congressional Record with dozens of citations from the literature, safety databases, and slides showing evidence that the Spike protein in the COVID-19 vaccine causes widespread damage to the human body. Dr. McCullough pointed out that for genetic products, the FDA's regulatory time window for safety concerns is five years. Americans are worried. According to a Rasmussen poll, on the day of the hearing, 53% of Americans believe that serious side effects from vaccines lead to a large number of unexplained deaths.

Please take the time to watch the audition and share it widely with your family, friends and colleagues. In closing, Senator Johnson asks doctors and other health care workers to come forward, be honest about their mistakes, and get on the good side of history. The COVID-19 vaccine was a biosecurity disaster for the world. On January 12, 2024, all three witnesses called for the withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccine products from the market due to safety concerns - this is on the record.

A recent review found that non-live vaccines generally increase the risk of all-cause mortality as well. In addition to potentially preventing a given disease, vaccines can also cause persistent, non-specific effects that can affect an individual's lifetime survival.

In a review published Dec. 26 in the journal Vaccine, researchers found that non-live vaccines such as influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis B and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) tend to cause non-specific adverse reactions (NSEs). they cause, increasing an individual's overall risk of death and potential risk of infection from the diseases they are intended to protect against.

A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the pathogen, which is less virulent but capable of multiplying in the body, thus mimicking the course of the actual disease. Non-live vaccines use inactivated viruses, fragments or genes of a pathogen to induce an immune response without the pathogen multiplying.

Live vaccines produce a much stronger immune response and usually require only one injection, while non-live vaccines produce a weaker response and often require multiple injections.

To date, research has identified a number of non-live vaccines that cause non-specific adverse effects, namely DTaP and Tdap, influenza H1N1, malaria, hepatitis B, inactivated polio and COVID mRNA vaccines.

The vaccine study singled out DTaP, influenza, malaria, hepatitis B and COVID mRNA vaccines.

On the other hand, live vaccines such as oral live polio vaccine (OPV), Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for tuberculosis, and smallpox vaccines have all been shown to have beneficial, nonspecific effects, according to the study.

"Live vaccines induce epigenetic changes that train the innate immune system and increase immunity to unrelated infections. In contrast, non-live vaccines may promote 'tolerance' that increases susceptibility to unrelated diseases," the authors suggested.

The study was primarily based on decades of work by Danish researcher Dr. Christine Stabell Benn and Professor Peter Aaby.

"Our work is a tribute to their great scientific work that was not recognized," biologist Alberto Rubio-Casillas, one of the study's authors, told The Epoch Times.

Non-live vaccines are like an 'ill-prepared' army

"Historically, we've thought of the innate immune system as the first line of defense," Dr. Benn told The Epoch Times.

It was thought that innate immunity could not store memory. Using a war analogy, the "army" of the immune system could not learn from previous battles with pathogens. Adaptive immunity, on the other hand, could learn and train itself, forming antibodies to fight infection.

Therefore, for a long time, vaccines were evaluated based on their effect on the adaptive immune system, and antibodies were measured after vaccination.

However, Dutch researchers have since shown that the innate immune system can also be trained. After vaccinating people with BCG vaccines and harvesting some of the patients' innate immune cells, the researchers found that after vaccination, the innate cells produced a stronger immune response and showed better clearance of tuberculosis and other bacteria and fungi compared to the patients' pre-vaccination status compared to

However, the opposite has been shown for non-live vaccines.

So the innate immune system actually learns something from previous battles. This is called trained innate immunity.

Live vaccines, which mimic an actual disease, enhance the effectiveness of the innate immune system in fighting infection. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, weaken the immune system's ability to fight off infections.

In a TED talk, Dr. Benn compared infections to a tennis match and live vaccines to a tennis coach. A tennis coach can change tactics and strategies, preparing the body to use "various tricks" against the pathogen. However, non-live vaccines are like tennis ball machines that shoot balls at a specific speed and point. If someone only trains on a tennis ball machine, they will be less prepared for an actual match.

"So you can be ill-prepared and even worse when a real opponent comes on the court and balls start coming and hitting somewhere other than what you've trained for," Dr. Benn said.

Non-specific effects

Some vaccines produce positive non-specific effects, but others may result in overall unfavorable non-specific effects. The order in which vaccines are administered also plays a role.

While non-live vaccines cause negative NSEs, giving the live vaccine after the non-live vaccine neutralizes the negative NSEs, Dr. Benn said.

This has been shown in studies evaluating the safety of measles vaccines, which are often administered at the same time as the non-live vaccine, DTP. Studies have found that if the measles vaccine is given after the DTP vaccine, there is an overall positive effect, while if this order is reversed, there is a negative effect.

"The effects seem to be strongest as long as the vaccine is the latest vaccine," said Dr.

Dr. Benn added that the BCG vaccine has long-term beneficial, nonspecific effects "despite other vaccines being given afterward."

The DTaP vaccine has arguably the most evidence of adverse non-specific effects. Girls who received the DTaP vaccine had a 50 percent higher risk of death than boys who received it. Compared to girls who did not receive the DTaP vaccine, vaccinated girls had more than 2.5 times the risk of dying compared to vaccinated girls.

Dr. Benn's studies have generally shown that girls are at greater risk of developing non-specific adverse effects after administration of the non-live vaccine.

Vaccines replacing live vaccines with non-live vaccines

Non-live vaccines are increasingly replacing live vaccines. For example, the live, oral polio vaccine is no longer available on the US market, and a non-live version is administered instead.

Replacing live vaccines with non-live vaccines could pose a potential health risk to general population immunity, as immune systems become less trained and potentially "lazy," Dr. Benn said.

The main reason non-live vaccines are preferred over live vaccines is that they are considered safer for people with compromised immune systems.

Because the live vaccine causes mild disease in the body, people with acquired immune deficiency syndrome can become sick from the injection and die because their bodies are unable to clear the infection. In contrast, non-live vaccines only contain disease components, so they cannot cause disease.

From that perspective, Dr. Benn says, "the real risk of getting sick from live vaccines is seen as a bigger threat than I think it deserves."

People with weakened immune systems due to age or chronic illness can sometimes benefit from training their immune systems with live vaccines, according to research.

In a study of hospitalized elderly patients who were randomized to receive BCG vaccine or placebo, the incidence of disease among those receiving BCG vaccine was about half that seen in the placebo group.

Health Authorities Still Skeptical

Despite evidence of the potential superiority of live vaccines, Dr. Benn's research has gone largely unrecognized in academia.

"My understanding is that while most researchers now acknowledge non-specific effects, major health organizations are reluctant to accept our results because [the results] imply the possibility that some vaccines may sometimes be harmful. So it's easier to just dismiss the whole thing. " - He told.

"Vaccine skeptics, on the other hand, may find that our observations of non-live vaccines confirm their worst fears — that vaccines can be harmful — but that the benefits may be more difficult to accept. And their focus on the negative effects may make vaccine proponents even more rigid."

Immunologists now largely agree that some vaccines cause nonspecific effects, but how these effects should be quantified remains controversial.

This is because the non-specific effects of vaccines are context-dependent, while the specific effects of a vaccine are generally considered to be context-independent. For example, women may produce more antibodies than men, and younger people may produce more than older people, but most people still receive some form of protection.

"In contrast, because nonspecific effects affect the broader innate and general immune system, they depend on other factors in the immune system ... such as other health interventions that can alter and modify nonspecific effects," Dr. Benn explained. He added that not everyone receives the same benefits.

In addition, pharmaceutical companies may be reluctant to produce live vaccines because they are more difficult to breed and produce.

"If you've ever tried baking with sourdough, it's a bit like live vaccines; they're very dependent on the temperature of the room, the water used to grow them and so on," Dr Benn said.

"But basically all the live vaccines that I'm talking about — they're off patent, they're super cheap to make, and it's one of the cheapest vaccines we can make."

Vaccine Safety: NSEs vs. Adverse Events

Although live vaccines usually cause positive NSEs, this does not mean that they cannot cause side effects. NSEs are considered a separate entity from adverse events, Dr. Benn explained. In rare cases, he said, live vaccines can cause actual disease in some recipients, such as people who are born with severe defects in their immune systems or suffer from severe immunodeficiency, such as fulminant AIDS.

For COVID-19 vaccines, live vaccines were probably not considered because of concerns about the development of recombinant viruses when a vaccinated person comes into contact with a circulating virus strain.

However, despite the potentially beneficial NSEs, COVID vaccines may still have side effects due to the presence of highly toxic spike proteins, which studies are now linking to long-term COVID and vaccine injury.

In the medical textbook "The Immune Response," the authors wrote that in isolated cases, live virus strains administered to individuals can regain their virulence and cause disease in recipients. In addition, there is a risk that they may be infected with other virus strains during production.

Soft questions and evasive answers leave Americans dissatisfied. I appeared on Outside the Beltway with John Fredericks on Real America's Voice to comment on Dr. Fauci's hearing of the US House of Representatives' subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic this week. My interview took place on the morning of Friday, January 12, 2024, just hours before I was scheduled to testify before Congress and provide my analysis of the pandemic response and the vaccine scandal.

Fauci was not asked a single important question by the committee about his role with Dr. Ralph Baric, Dr. Peter Daszak, and Dr. Shi Zhengli in the SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology-1-CoV virus gain-of- in the creation of function through research. They did not ask why the genetic code of Baric's virus was not made public in accordance with standard procedures for government-sponsored research.

Menachery et al, publications describing the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 prototype virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the years prior to publication in 2015 and 2016.

The answer is probably that the code was the same or closely related to the ancient Wuhan strain that sickened the entire world. Finally, Fauci was not asked about the record injuries, disabilities and deaths.

I told Fredericks that for the first time I was preparing to make a call to withdraw the COVID-19 vaccines and place them on the congressional record. I also wanted to ask Congress, through its five committees that oversee the FDA, to make this call and send it to HHS, which used to operate this rogue agency overseas.

Please listen to this brief update as we transition to my congressional testimony a few hours later in the Rayburn Building.

The winter break ended a week ago, and students and children started pouring back into schools and kindergartens. However, at the same time, the flu season is raging, and the number of coronavirus cases is also increasing. But when can we let the child in among others, and at what point are we better off keeping them at home?

On Monday, the extended winter break for all children ended, so most of them were forced to go back to kindergarten and sit back at school. However, many parents may be confused by the fact that, at the same time, the flu season is also in full swing, and the number of people infected with the coronavirus is also constantly increasing. And the question is given: what is the moment when we can still let our child go so that we can work in peace, and when is it better if he no longer joins his peers?

In the United Kingdom in recent weeks, the National Health Service (NHS) launched a campaign with the slogan "The moment counts, the presence counts", which summarized when children should stay at home. For example, according to the health service, children can still be sent to school with a cough and cold, but if they already have a fever, it is better to stay home.

However, it is much more interesting that, in addition to a sore throat, conjunctivitis is not classified as a disease that would justify absence. An exception is also made if the child has a fever and cannot do schoolwork. But is it really better at this time if the child stays at home even if the fever has not yet developed?

Real Christmas trees can carry fungi and pollen that can cause allergy and asthma symptoms during the holiday season.

On the one hand, one side of the issue is that parents are afraid that if they send their children in, an epidemic will develop. However, it is important to know that dozens of studies have shown that the closures have hindered the development of children somewhat. The children may have developed anxiety and fear during the closures, which makes them lose their self-confidence more easily and become more prone to tantrums.

Going to school can often help alleviate the underlying problems, as a longer absence probably increases children's anxiety about future participation rather than reducing it, NHM said.

We all want our child to have the best possible start in life. And we know that going to school is vital for children's well-being, as it is important for their performance and development, as well as having an impact on their future careers, said Education Minister Gillian Keegan. (...)

Canary in a Covid World, edited by CH Klotz, an audiobook published in November 2023 and available on Amazon, subtitled "How Propaganda and Censorship Changed (My) World", is a collection of essays on the performance of our institutions in the age of Covid-19. It is not limited to propaganda etc. regarding complaints. It tells the story of misinformation by communicating data. I highly recommend this book as follows:

Legislators generally do not have the time, vocabulary, or inclination to read scholarly articles, reviews, or even testimony. In the classification of personality types, legislators are usually relators. They are talking. (Of course, we're assuming they're not sociopaths, but for some...!?)

And they drive too. A lot. Legislatures in my state are only in session Tuesday through Thursday. And only half the year. So they go to the capital and back home by car. It can be a 3-hour journey, but with the exception of those who live in the vicinity of the capital, at least an hour. So they have time to listen. This book is the BEST way to communicate your concerns about the way governments at all levels, media, health, scientists and pharmaceuticals have handled the Covid-19 era. For the Relators, this will make the case for reforms.

The book is emotional. The book is compelling. The book, in the form of an audiobook, is in the wheelhouse of the relators.

Specifically, it confirms your "feeling" as to why the mentioned professional fields have lost all their integrity for you. INTEGRITY is the key word in the activist's dictionary. RECOVERING INTEGRITY is your goal, and that should be the goal of the legislature - or pre-elect and vote them out! This book is your tool. You have to make a change or they have a stone hard dead heart! Make sure they listen. Please!

Below is the publisher's summary:

Perhaps the most important and informative book ever compiled in the Covid era, and a must-read (listen) for everyone. The thirty-four contributors to the collection of essays, Canary Islands, brave people. They are critical thinkers who are willing to risk everything to speak their truth. They seek to warn us all of what COVID was and what may lie ahead.

Community leaders. Novelists, journalists, lawyers, judges, scientists, doctors, academics, politicians, researchers, vaccine victims and data scientists. Some have been shouting from the rooftops since the beginning of the pandemic, others found their voice when the contradictions between public policy and health policy became undeniable.

What unites them is that they have provided factual evidence to those seeking answers. They eased our fear and gave us hope. They have shown us all that if our opinions differ from what the mainstream media deems acceptable, we are not alone.

The topic of COVID is often too sensitive to engage in polite conversation. Battle lines are being drawn and most of the time there is no data, fact or opinion that will change the points of view. However, we believe that once people understand that their opinions are formed based on information that has been heavily censored, and that most traditional media are now propaganda tools, they will be more inclined to consider the possibility that not everything is as it seems.

The aim of this book is to bring the thinking voices together singing as a chorus. The diversity of these voices harmonizing perhaps allows others to hear the music. In the last three years, solo voices have been left out of the discourse too often.

Because once you see it, you can't take it back. You will understand the power of censorship and propaganda to hide the lies and dishonesty that now underpin our social foundations.

Fluoride on Trial: The Censored Science on Fluoride and Your Health
This revealing documentary by CHD.TV is about the dangers of fluoride and the US government's nefarious attempt to cover up the truth.
Fluoride on Trial: The Censored Science on Fluoride and Your Health delves into a groundbreaking lawsuit to ban the addition of fluoride chemicals to water in the United States. The lead attorney on the case, Michael Connett, sits down with Children's Health Defense President Mary Holland to lift the lid on fluoride and detail the documents released by the Freedom of Information Act. These documents reveal that a landmark federal review of fluoride's dangers to the brain was blocked by the highest political leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services. A series of shocking interviews with federal health experts questioned in the case, including representatives of the Centers for Disease Control and the Environmental Protection Agency, reveal the disturbing truth about fluoride.

and about which Malone, Weissman, Karikó, Bourla, Bancel, Sahin, etc. kept quiet and did not alert the public.
5 lies: 1) vaccines cannot enter the cell nucleus 2) mRNA is rapidly degraded in the cell 3) spike protein is rapidly degraded 4) mRNA cannot be transcribed into DNA 5) the vaccine remains at the injection site.

When these people who knew and know about it could have warned the public, they stayed silent. Too late, after millions have already been tricked into taking the vaccine, which has been shown to be ineffective and harmful. Many were injured.

Why were they silent? What did they gain by listening? We would like to know if there is any compensation.