Video: RT trolled the entire EU-US demagogic sanctions-war machine in just over 1 minute...
Quite a real depiction of the grotesque farce that the forces controlling the US and the EU are trying to impose

Unexpected twist: the war may now be decided
06.08.2023. origo

Russian President Vladimir Putin recently had a telephone conversation with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, during which, in addition to the cooperation between the two countries, the blowing up of the Nova Kahovka dam was also discussed, several Russian news portals reported.

The Kremlin statement revealed that cooperation in energy, trade and tourism was the main topic of conversation between Erdogan and Putin. Both parties remain committed to joint projects and expect cooperation in the future.

According to Vladimir Putin, the Ukrainians have committed another terrorist attack

Regarding the war in Ukraine, Putin said that with the encouragement of their Western supporters, the Ukrainians continue to play dangerous games, which could lead to further escalation of the conflict. Putin was deeply outraged by the sabotage actions carried out by the Kiev regime on Russian territories.

AN EXAMPLE OF THIS WAS THE BARBAROUS EXPLOSION OF THE NOVA KAHOVKA DAM IN THE HERSON REGION, WHICH LEADED TO A LARGE-SCALE HUMANITARIAN AND ECOLOGICAL DISASTER.

In response, Erdogan suggested that an independent commission be established to investigate what happened. According to him, UN, Russian and Ukrainian members should also be included in the committee.

WHO's digital health certificate is a step towards making WHO the powerhouse of One World Government
Rhoda Wilson June 13, 2023 Exposé

June 5, 2023 World Health Organization ("WHO") and European Commission ("EC") announced the launch of a digital health initiative under which WHO will create a global Covid vaccination certification system based on the existing Digital Covid Certificate of the European Union ("EU").

This vaccination passport system will be expanded into the Global Digital Health Certification Network ("GDHCN") operated by WHO, which will "include a wide range of digital products to ensure better health for all".

WHO members have approved a budget of $6.83 billion for the next two years, which will require a 20% increase in mandatory membership fees.

The increase in the budget is necessary because WHO is being positioned as the sole decision-maker over public health globally through the proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations ("IHR"), each of which will strengthen WHO's authority and power in different ways, while it abolishes national sovereignty and human rights.

Unified Health Care is also included in the pandemic contract, which fits perfectly with the narrative of The Great Reset. Add up the treaty, the IHR amendments and One Health, and it becomes clear that the WHO is being established as the de facto power center of the deep state, and that this One World Government will control everything.



WHO launches digital health partnership with Europe
Dr. Joseph Mercola

On June 5, 2023, WHO and the European Commission announced that they are "launching a landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security."

As explained in the press release3, starting this month WHO will establish a global covid vaccination certification system based on the EU's existing Digital Covid Certificate ("EU DCC") to "facilitate global mobility and protect citizens worldwide from current and future health threats ".

Eventually, this vaccine passport system will expand into the Global Digital Health Certification Network ("GDHCN") operated by the WHO, which will "include a wide range of digital products to ensure better health for all." The vaccine passport will eventually cover all recommended vaccinations, not just covid. The press release continues:

This partnership will work on the technical development of the WHO system, using a phased approach, to cover additional use cases that may include, for example, the digitization of the International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis. The expansion of such digital solutions will be essential to ensure better health for citizens worldwide.

This collaboration is based on shared values ​​and principles of transparency and openness, inclusion, accountability, data protection and privacy, security, global scalability and fairness. The European Commission and WHO will work together to encourage the greatest possible global uptake and participation.

Why introduce the Covid Passport if injections don't work?
As reported by The Daily Skeptic, the announcement raises a number of questions:

The vaccination passport is controversial even in the UN... June 30, 2021 ... UNESCO's World Committee on Ethics in Science and Technology and UNESCO's International Committee on Bioethics issued a joint statement warning that "all covid-19 certificates ... should take into account scientific uncertainty about the degree of protection provided by individual vaccines, previous infections and negative covid-19 test results".

In light of these concerns, UN agencies recommended that "a research program should be developed to assess their impact on society and public health and the risks they may pose."

The new press release from the WHO and the EU makes no mention of the progress of this research program or whether it has been established at all. Is it not necessary to establish the effectiveness and cost-benefit profile of an intervention before it is globally introduced and made permanent?

Given how leaky the Kovis vaccines are and how short-lived the protection they provide — some studies show that the vaccinated have higher infection rates than the unvaccinated — it's hard to imagine that a vaccine passport would really limit the spread of the disease. .

However, the WHO and the EU do not seem to consider this issue relevant. Is it because they blindly assume that vaccines are beneficial, or because they have other reasons for wanting to spread this restrictive technology around the world?

The introduction of the vaccine passport system - which the WHO claimed it did not support when concerns were initially raised about it in 20217 - is a clear sign that the WHO fully expects to take control of global health and that the takeover public health is not the primary incentive behind it.

The takeover of WHO is moving forward at full speed

WHO members have already approved a budget of 6.83 billion dollars for the next two years (2024-2025), which requires a 20% increase in mandatory membership fees. The "strategic priorities" that will receive most of this funding include:

- Extending universal health care to at least 1 billion people who do not currently have it.
- "Better protection against health emergencies" for 1 billion more people.
- Ensuring "better health and well-being" for 1 billion more people.
- Establishing more efficient and effective WHO support for member countries.
- Eradication of polio - probably through expanded vaccination programs.

This budget increase is also necessary because WHO is being positioned as the sole decision-maker for public health at the global level through the proposed Pandemics Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), each of which in different ways strengthens WHO's authority and power while eliminating national sovereignty and human rights.

If the WHO achieves its goal, it will no longer be a body that makes recommendations that countries are free to choose to follow. Rather, its "advice" will be akin to declarations of international law. Member States will have to follow WHO's "recommendations" or face costly consequences.

Once the Pandemics Treaty and IHR amendments are implemented, the WHO will have the power to order everything from climate shutdowns and border closures to mandatory vaccinations. We also warned that the WHO will introduce a mandatory vaccination passport system for population control purposes, and with the above announcement, we can consider this a settled fact.

The WHO will even have the power to dictate what is truth and what is half-information to be censored. The WHO is essentially banning democracy worldwide because democracy cannot exist without free speech in public debate.

Member States will have no choice but to censor what the WHO wants to censor, as each country must establish an enforcement agency to ensure that WHO regulations are followed across the country, and this includes censorship activities.

Understand where we're going

Video: Dr John Campbell: WHO's Global Digital Health Certification Network

For a further overview of WHO's new Global Digital Health Certification Network, see John Campbell's video overview above.

It is now more than imperative that people understand where we are headed and that the covid measures were not just a response to a particular pandemic, but rather the foundations of a totalitarian one world government where human rights and freedoms will no longer exist .

The pandemic treaty redefines human rights as "health equality" and nothing else. Amendments to the IHR specifically eliminate individual rights and freedoms. Article 3 of the IHR is amended as follows (strikes in the text indicate the text to be deleted, additions or amendments are underlined in bold):

This regulation is implemented with full respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms , based on the principles of fairness, inclusion and coherence, and in accordance with the common but differentiated responsibilities of the participating states, taking into account their social and economic development.

In other words, bodily autonomy and personal choice are being replaced by a one-size-fits-all remedy that ignores human dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. The right to opinions different from those of the WHO will also be abolished at the national level.

Article 2 of the IHR is also being amended so that the WHO will have the authority to take action on anything that "may affect public health", and this includes everything from climate and pollution to agricultural land use to the food industry, as it is determined by the One Health Care program, which is also included in the Pandemic Agreement.

To understand what is at stake, please review the article-by-article compilation of the proposed amendments to the IHR found here and compare it to the proposed treaty. The "zero draft" dated February 1, 2023 can be found here.

As the WHO explained already in 2021, the treaty is the "framework that recognizes the central role of IHR". So these two instruments are designed and designed to work as a unit, the treaty recognizes IHL and amendments to IHL strip nations of their sovereignty.

But that's not all. The contract on the pandemic also includes One Health Care, which fits perfectly with the narrative of The Great Reset. If you add these three things - the treaty, the IHR amendments and One Health - it becomes clear that the WHO will be established as the de facto power center of the deep state, and this One World Government will control everything.

The treaty extends WHO's authority beyond epidemics

As the figure below illustrates, the One Health program is based on the premise that many aspects of life and the environment can affect human health.

In addition to the life segments listed in the graph, according to a document from the One Health Commission, the scope of One Health covers communications, economy, civil society, global trade, trade and security, public policy and regulation, research, non-communicable diseases and many more.


Under the new treaty, the WHO will have unilateral decision-making authority in all these areas, and its dictates will supersede and supersede all local, state and federal laws. In short, if the Pandemic Convention is adopted, the WHO will not only have the authority to dictate how countries should prepare for and respond to the threat of a pandemic: it will be able to dictate every aspect of our lives.

The WHO, on the other hand, obeys its financiers and does what its financiers want, and the biggest financier is Bill Gates, if we add up his various sources of donations. Gates, of course, invested in all the primary Great Reset needs, including fake foods, drugs, vaccines, surveillance and climate modification technologies.

One Health is an upheaval of holistic health

As David Bell, senior researcher at the Brownstone Institute, a public health physician and former WHO health officer and scientist, has noted, the One Health Program is actually upending the centuries-old holistic concept of health:

Ill health is a tool of fear, and death even more so, especially for those who believe that we are merely organic constructs that end in dust and decay. A sect that feeds off these fears and claims that the entire biosphere threatens us with disease and death would have real potential for mass control.

If we convince our followers that man is the poison that has made this world so destructive, we have the means to incite hatred against non-believers while adding guilt to the means of obedience.

A sect based on fear of the world and people who poison the world, clothed in philanthropy and virtue, rose up among us. Using One Health terminology, it is now funded by the spoils of covids and with the help of technology capable of spreading this medieval witch-hunting sect globally.

The environment must be managed and protected everywhere for the benefit of man - physically, mentally and socially. The One Health concept, centered on such common sense, was once nothing more than that. This is a rational expression of an ancient principle ... Hygiene and better nutrition will save more lives than the next round of profiteering brought to us by Pfizer.

However ... One Health has been hijacked by self-proclaimed philanthropists ... One Health is being corrupted in two ways, but for the same purposes and by the same people. Understanding one tells us what kind of people we are dealing with, and the other reveals their motives.

The One Health Ideology is Anti-Human

As Bell explained, One Health is an ideology that equates human life and well-being with that of all other living things, including plants and animals. This means that the lives of you and your children are not more important than the lives of polar bears, trees, streams, and the soil.

If your actions cause ecological damage and the polar bear does not, then you are the one who needs to be removed from the equation. This is the essence of this ideology. This is not environmentally friendly, it is essentially anti-human.

"In this 'just' worldview, man becomes a polluter," writes Bell. "Ever-growing human populations have driven other species to extinction through environmental change, from the megafauna of ancient Australasia to the plummeting insect populations of modern Europe."

Humans become the plague of the Earth, so their limitation, impoverishment and death may be justified for the sake of a greater good.

It is difficult for people to understand that this is the guiding ideology of public figures as it is contrary to most human moral systems or natural law... We must understand what ideology is driving this movement as they intend us to follow their dictates and they also want to indoctrinate our children.

Exposing the sterile ideology of One Health

One Health also aims to control the masses through fear. We are constantly bombarded with predictions of doom and told that we must be protected for our own good.

"Extending this approach from a single virus to any aspect of the biosphere that affects human well-being, such as climate, opens up the possibility of using this totalitarian tool of population control to reshape society according to the model desired by the fear mongers," he notes. Bell, adding:

With amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and a new "pandemic treaty," the WHO is pairing the broad definition of One Health with a definition of "emergency" that simply requires recognition of the threat rather than the actual harm.

If we use the WHO's broad definition of health, "physical, mental and social well-being", then almost all aspects of normal life could be included in the concept of health. Managed through a prescriptive public health paradigm that includes global mandates, restrictions, and censorship, the drivers of this agenda can gain unprecedented power.

[In 2019] the WHO, in its recommendations for pandemic influenza, stated that border closures, quarantines and prolonged business closures should never be implemented in response to a pandemic. These measures would increase inequality and disproportionately harm low-income earners, destroying both economies and social capital.

WHO in 2020, focusing its priorities on a new constituency, supported the same inequitable policies. The evidence hasn't changed, but the electorate has. Wealthy people and corporations have become major funders of WHO programs. Those who benefit from better nutrition and hygiene cannot finance the growing number of WHO staff, but those who benefit from the largesse of the epidemic response can.

Evil cannot be defeated by hiding from it. We fight it by exposing the ideology that drives it, the greed, the lies and the fraud... Eventually the crazy ideologues collapse under the weight of their own fraud and the shallowness of their dogmas.

The earth-mother religion of the corrupted One Health and the feudalistic ambitions of its priests will be no different. We don't have to fear public health or a holistic worldview. These are ours, and they can be forces for good. Rather, we need to expose the emptiness of those people who, driven by their own greed and sterile ideologies, would subvert them.

We are running out of time.

It is important that, as the comedian Jimmy Dore notes in the above video, the member countries do not have to sign the convention against the pandemic. This is an opt-out proposal. If a nation does not withdraw by the deadline, it automatically accepts the treaty.

Under the current schedule, the World Health Assembly (WHA) will vote on the pandemic treaty in May 2024, and it will enter into force 30 days later. That leaves just under a year and a half to get the US to withdraw, or even better, to withdraw from the WHO altogether.

Amendments to the IHR will also be voted on in May 2024. The 10-month deadline for member states to reject the amendments expires in March 2025, and the amendments will enter into force in May 2025 for all countries that have not rejected them. For any member country that rejects the amendments, the 2005 IHR will apply.

Strangely enough, some of the amendments to the IHR have already been adopted. As author and researcher James Roguski reported,20 they were adopted at the 75th World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022, although nothing was signed. This is yet another proof of the rampant lawlessness and subversive tactics we are dealing with.

Worryingly, many Americans don't even know that the US government is in the process of surrendering our national sovereignty and everyone's personal bodily autonomy to the WHO because the corporate media isn't talking about it.

So please share this and any other articles you find on this topic with everyone you know and continue to educate yourself. These are far and away the greatest threats to freedom the world has ever seen, and the risks apply to everyone equally, no matter where you live.

Fact checkers take advantage of the confusion

Note that although the IHR amendments and the Treaty affect different areas of WHO's new power structure, together they will serve to massively empower WHO once both enter into force. Also remember that since the global takeover is happening on multiple fronts, it's easy to get confused about the details, and that confusion can easily become fodder for fact-checkers. According to The Defender:

The AP recently conducted a "fact check" against claims that the Pandemic Treaty threatens national sovereignty. According to the AP, it "does not override any nation's ability to adopt individual pandemic policies" and "does not override any nation's individual health or domestic policies." "Practically, there would be no legal consequences for signatories who do not comply with the contract or violate its terms".

The AP's "fact check" does not mention the proposed changes to the IHR. Author and researcher [James] Roguski cited this as an example of the frequent confusion between the Pandemic Agreement and the IHR amendments.

"Everyone is paying attention to the contract," Roguski said. "They completely and totally go through the details of the amendments, attribute them to the Treaty, and 'fact check' them to the hilt."

Calling on Congress to Withdraw US from WHO

Although the US House and Senate have introduced identical bills to thwart the takeover of the WHO through the proposed Pandemic Treaty, it still may not protect us because the treaty specifically it is written to bypass the Senate approval process.

A much more effective strategy would be for Congress to withhold its annual contribution to the WHO and then withdraw the US from the WHO entirely. I think it might be worth supporting all these strategies. So please contact your representatives and urge them

to support the "No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act"24,25,26,27,28.
Withhold WHO funding
Support the withdrawal of the USA from the WHO.
We must also protect our nation against IHR amendments. To this end, the World Health Council launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. You can participate in the following way.

An investigation was launched into the ventilator business
June 13, 2023 mfor

Three times, however, the result is close to zero. We learned all of this from the parliamentary written answer, in which Tamás Mellár, a Párbeszéd politician, asked Sándor Pintér whether an investigation had been launched into the purchase of overpriced ventilators.

The Member of Parliament interpreted a citizen's question in his letter to the Minister of the Interior, in which he wrote: "The machines arrived in such quantity that at the same time 15,825 machines were unused in the warehouses. But the government here still felt that there were not enough ventilators in the country, so he ordered another 1,000. The purchases of the ventilators revealed that he managed to buy them well above the market price, more expensive than the governments of the surrounding countries".

He added: "due to the purchase of a similar overpriced ventilator, the Prime Minister of the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina was sentenced to 4 years in prison. So, was the investigation started, and if so, what was the outcome of the investigation?"


Instead of Sándor Pintér, State Secretary Bence Rétvári answered again and gave information about the following:

So far, the police have been approached three times because of ventilators purchased at too high a price, and in all three cases a member of parliament. But all three investigations were quickly closed.

- First, on July 12, 2020, a politician submitted a question to the chief prosecutor, which the prosecutor's office interpreted as a complaint, and therefore sent the case to the investigative authorities. The Emergency Police National Investigation Office filed the case on July 30, 2020 due to the suspicion of committing the crime of misappropriation causing a particularly significant financial disadvantage. But since there was no suspicion of the crime, he rejected it on August 3, 2020.
- On September 7, 2020, a representative also filed a complaint with the Central Prosecutor General's Office against an unknown perpetrator for a crime similar to the above, which was also forwarded to the National Investigation Office of the Emergency Police. On September 18, 2020, the investigative authority ordered the addition of the report, and in doing so established that the allegations are the same as the report that had already been assessed, and that the information provided by the reporter did not support the commission of a crime. So this too was rejected.
- But, as we know, there are three Hungarian truths: on December 24, 2020, Christmas Day (!), a representative also turned to the chief prosecutor, who forwarded the complaint to the Budapest Police Headquarters. On January 18, 2021, the Criminal Directorate of the ORFK passed the case on to the National Investigation Office of the Emergency Police, so the whole topic was back on the starting line again. Unsurprisingly, they then found that the subject of the report was the same as the previous two, so they did not even make a rejection decision, but only informed the reporting representative about it.

"Regarding the purchase of the ventilators, no further report was received by the investigating authorities of the police and no investigation was initiated in this connection," Rétvári stated.

The state secretary does not mention that it would be quite difficult to conduct any kind of investigation now, since in November 2021 the Ministry of Foreign Affairs destroyed part of the documents of the suspicious, overpriced purchase of ventilators in Malaysia concluded a year and a half earlier, so the supplier that became suspicious, GR Technologies also documents certifying the company's transparency. And even this was revealed only after a public interest data request by Transparency International.